Mazda
CX-50
Volvo
XC60
Mazda CX-50 vs Volvo XC60: 2025 Comparison
The short answer
Based on available data, the Volvo XC60 comes out ahead of the Mazda CX-50 on fuel economy and power. Check the specs table and owner sentiment below for the full comparison before deciding between the two. Both are covered by real owner reports on CarWizz.
Specs side by side
What owners say
CX-50
Overall
Mixed sentiment with a clear distinction between powertrain choices. The CX-50 Hybrid is widely praised for its excellent fuel economy (38 MPG combined), strong acceleration (0-60 mph in 7.6 seconds / 0-97 km/h), and the proven reliability of its Toyota-sourced hybrid drivetrain, which is considered "bulletproof." The gas-only models, particularly the Turbo variant, are acknowledged for being quick and fun to drive but are criticized for poor fuel economy and a harsh, uncomfortable ride. Significant and recurrent criticism is directed at the vehicle's build quality, fit-and-finish issues, and general reliability stemming from its Alabama, USA manufacturing plant, with multiple reports of various glitches, faults, and premature wear.
Best version to buy
CX-50 Hybrid (Premium or Premium Plus trims). The hybrid powertrain is overwhelmingly recommended for its combination of fuel efficiency, adequate power, and the exceptional reliability of the Toyota hybrid system.
Known issues
- ⚠Build quality and reliability concerns (Alabama plant): various glitches, fuel door failures, poor stitching on seats, fit-and-finish issues, general drop in quality compared to Japanese-built Mazdas. Frequency: very frequent.
- ⚠Uncomfortable, firm ride quality: described as harsh, bumpy, and jarring over imperfections, especially in Turbo models and/or those with larger wheels. Frequency: very frequent.
- ⚠Firm/uncomfortable seats: side bolsters described as very firm, potentially uncomfortable for wider occupants. Frequency: recurrent.
XC60
Overall
Mixed sentiment with a clear generational divide. The vehicle is consistently praised for its premium interior feel, comfortable ride, strong safety reputation, and attractive design, with specific engines like the T5 and T6 noted for smoothness and adequate power. However, significant and recurrent criticism is directed at long-term reliability and high ownership costs beyond the warranty period.
Best version to buy
Insufficient owner data available to declare a single "best" version. Feedback suggests prioritizing simpler, proven powertrains for reliability.
Known issues
- ⚠High long-term maintenance and repair costs: very frequent mention of expensive repairs (e.g., $1,300 for brake hoses, $4,000+ for AC evaporator, $5,000+ for supercharger clutch), with parts and dealership labor cited as exorbitant.
- ⚠AAOS (Android Automotive) infotainment system problems: bugs, sluggish performance, system freezes, failed over-the-air updates, apps stopping working, issues that disable connected features like climate control. Frequency: very frequent.
- ⚠Reliability concerns with complex powertrains (B6, T8 PHEV): supercharger clutch failure predicted between 90,000-120,000 miles; electrical gremlins; high-voltage heater (HVH) failure in PHEVs; expensive hybrid system components (e.g., onb…
The verdict
The Volvo XC60 is the better choice for most buyers.
It has better fuel economy on its best-equipped version than the Mazda CX-50, based on the data above. If power matters more to you than running costs, the Mazda CX-50 is worth a closer look instead.
Explore further
Not sure which one fits you?
Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more reliable, the Mazda CX-50 or the Volvo XC60?
Owner reports show similar reliability sentiment for the Mazda CX-50 and the Volvo XC60. Check the known issues listed above for specific differences between the two.
Which is better for families, the Mazda CX-50 or the Volvo XC60?
Data on family-specific factors like cargo space is limited for one or both models, but based on available reports, both are positioned as practical daily drivers. Check the specs table above for seating and body type.
Which has better fuel economy, the Mazda CX-50 or the Volvo XC60?
The Volvo XC60 is more fuel-efficient on paper: 2.9-3.8 L/100km combined versus 9.4 L/100km for the Mazda CX-50, based on the best-equipped catalogued version of each.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Mazda CX-50 or the Volvo XC60?
Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but owner reports mention cost-related concerns more often for the Volvo XC60 than the Mazda CX-50. See the known issues comparison above.