Maserati
MC20
McLaren
GT
Maserati MC20 vs McLaren GT: 2023 Comparison
The short answer
The Maserati MC20 offers power, while the McLaren GT excels at fuel economy instead. Choose the Maserati MC20 if you prioritize power in daily driving, or the McLaren GT if fuel economy matters more for your needs. Both are covered by real owner reports on CarWizz.
Specs side by side
What owners say
MC20
Overall
Mixed to positive sentiment, heavily influenced by purchase price. The vehicle is overwhelmingly praised for its stunning, elegant, and unique design, frequently described as one of the most beautiful modern supercars. The twin-turbo V6 Nettuno engine with F1-derived technology is noted for its high specific output and strong performance, and the carbon monocoque chassis contributes to its exotic appeal.
Best version to buy
Insufficient owner data available to specify a trim or version. Discussions focus on the coupe model, with some mentions of the desirability of the full carbon fiber exterior package and the upcoming MC20 Folgore (EV) variant.
Known issues
- ⚠Severe depreciation: very rapid loss in value, with new cars frequently sold $80,000-$130,000 below MSRP and used values in the $150,000-$200,000 range for early models. Frequency: very frequent.
- ⚠Exhaust sound: the twin-turbo V6, while technologically advanced, is criticized for not sounding as epic or exciting as V8/V10 competitors, even with an aftermarket upgrade. Frequency: recurrent.
- ⚠Brand reputation/reliability concerns: pervasive worry over Maserati's historical reliability, stemming from past models like the Ghibli and Levante, casting doubt on long-term ownership costs. Frequency: recurrent.
GT
Overall
Mixed sentiment with a clear divide between its intended purpose and owner experience. The vehicle is acknowledged for its unique positioning as a more comfortable and practical McLaren, featuring a luxurious interior with soft nappa leather, premium audio, and a glovebox: a rarity in the brand's lineup. It is praised for its exceptional cargo space (570 liters split between front and rear), which is noted as best-in-class among supercars and even exceeds some sedans.
Best version to buy
Insufficient owner data available to specify a best version or trim. One owner mentions their GT spec included aluminum paddles as part of a 'Luxe' package, which were appreciated for their quality.
Known issues
- ⚠Questionable Grand Tourer execution: mid-engine layout, open cargo area behind seats with risk of items sliding forward, lack of separated trunk. Frequency: recurrent.
- ⚠Infotainment system deficiencies: lacks Apple CarPlay/Android Auto, considered subpar for the class. Frequency: recurrent.
- ⚠Cramped driver footwell: limited space for left foot due to carbon tub design. Frequency: isolated.
The verdict
The McLaren GT is the better choice for most buyers.
It has better fuel economy on its best-equipped version than the Maserati MC20, based on the data above. If power matters more to you than running costs, the Maserati MC20 is worth a closer look instead.
Explore further
Not sure which one fits you?
Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more reliable, the Maserati MC20 or the McLaren GT?
Owner reports show similar reliability sentiment for the Maserati MC20 and the McLaren GT. Check the known issues listed above for specific differences between the two.
Which is better for families, the Maserati MC20 or the McLaren GT?
Both seat a similar number of passengers based on our data. The Maserati MC20 is classed as a Roadster, the McLaren GT as a Coupe, which affects cargo space and ride height for family use.
Which has better fuel economy, the Maserati MC20 or the McLaren GT?
The McLaren GT is more fuel-efficient on paper: 10.8 L/100km combined versus 11.5 L/100km for the Maserati MC20, based on the best-equipped catalogued version of each.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Maserati MC20 or the McLaren GT?
Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but reliability signals above are the closest proxy: fewer reported issues generally means lower repair costs over time.