Photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC)
Power
0–62 mph (0–100 km/h)
Top speed (198 km/h)
Fuel, maker's test (10 L/100 km)
What owners say
Our take, from owner reports
Sentiment is overwhelmingly negative, with the vehicle frequently cited as a symbol of poor reliability and build quality.
7 problems reported (2 very frequent, 5 recurrent) · high confidence
Problems owners report
- Very frequentPoor general reliability and frequent breakdowns
Described as having a major mechanical issue "every other time it left the driveway.".
- Very frequentSevere electrical problems ("gremlins")
Interior lights failing, erroneous warning lights, faulty chimes, no-start conditions. Tracing wiring faults is described as difficult.
- RecurrentAutomatic transmission failures
The A604/41TE "Ultradrive" transmission is specifically cited as problematic. Using incorrect ATF fluid (not ATF+4) is noted to shorten transmission life.
+ 4 more issuesShow fewer
- RecurrentEngine failures and poor performance
The Chrysler 2.2L and 2.5L four-cylinder engines are criticized for being underpowered ("gutless"), burning oil, and suffering catastrophic failures like thrown bearings, cracked blocks, and rod knock. The 2.2L Turbo I is also mentioned negatively.
- RecurrentCooling system problems
Overheating, immediate radiator fan operation preventing warm-up, suspected faulty coolant temperature sensors.
- RecurrentFuel and starting issues
Hard starting, especially when hot, requiring full throttle; engine stalling during maneuvers; black smoke from exhaust indicating rich condition.
- RecurrentStructural and body issues
Rust requiring floor pan replacement, failing convertible tops, roof leaks.
The version owners recommend
Insufficient consensus data available. A single, isolated opinion cites the 1991 LeBaron convertible with the V6 engine as the "funnest car" for its get-up-and-go. Another mentions the GTC model. No trim or configuration emerges as a recommended choice from the broader, critical feedback.
Competitors to consider
Owners compare it most often with the Ford Mustang.
Is the LE Baron right for you?
Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.
Full owner reportHide full owner report
Overall sentiment
Sentiment is overwhelmingly negative, with the vehicle frequently cited as a symbol of poor reliability and build quality. The consensus from long-term owner reports characterizes it as a "pile of crap," "disaster," and "worst car contender." Positive remarks are extremely rare and isolated, typically referencing a specific enjoyable experience with a V6 convertible model. The primary criticisms center on pervasive mechanical failures, severe electrical issues, and poor engine performance, particularly with the base 2.2L and 2.5L four-cylinder engines. The vehicle is often described as a source of constant problems, leaving a lasting negative reputation for the brand.
Positioning vs competitors
Insufficient owner data available. No substantive comparisons are made by owners in the provided discussions.
Recommended configurations
Insufficient owner data available. No specific configurations are recommended. One mention notes that early models could be had with a manual transmission but are now exceedingly rare.
General recommendations
Overwhelmingly not recommended for purchase due to poor reliability. Owner feedback suggests these vehicles are best avoided unless acquired for very low cost ($600-$2,200 range) as a project car for a knowledgeable enthusiast willing to tackle constant repairs. Not suitable as a primary or dependable vehicle. Strong caution is advised regarding the automatic transmissions, specifically the A604/41TE "Ultradrive," which is described as a "disaster" with numerous issues. Potential buyers should expect significant electrical gremlins and major mechanical failures.
Remarks
The negative reputation is heavily tied to the "K-car" era of the 1980s, which focused on affordable but unreliable vehicles. The 2.7L V6 engine (not used in the LeBaron) is separately noted as a "sludge disaster" for Chrysler, contributing to the brand's overall poor perception. Discussions indicate these cars were often purchased cheaply by owners with limited maintenance budgets, leading to a cycle of neglect and failure that cemented their bad reputation. While some engines, like the Mitsubishi-sourced 2.5L V6 in later models, are noted as more reliable, the prevailing owner experience remains negative. Analysis based on approximately 40 substantive owner discussions and mentions across multiple vehicle communities.
Generation by generation
Owner insights per generation and US complaint/recall records (NHTSA).
Complaints and recalls by model yearSource: NHTSA (US)Show table
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Most-reported area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1996 | 3 | 0 | air bags |
Complaint counts come from owner reports filed with the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Higher-selling years naturally accumulate more complaints.
Specifications
3.0 i V6
3.0L 6-cylinder · 143 hp · FWD · automatic
Built 1990–1996