CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
Brands/Chrysler/PT Cruiser
Chrysler PT Cruiser

Photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC)

Chrysler

Chrysler PT Cruiser

Cabriolet · Gas · 9 versions · owner report

CompareFind my car
220Hp

Power

7.5s

0–62 mph (0–100 km/h)

120mph

Top speed (193 km/h)

21mpg

Combined, EPA 2010

Typical asking price (US)$4,596–$7,144median $5,495 · 47 live listings · 2001–2010

What owners say

Our take, from owner reports

Extremely polarized sentiment, split between nostalgic appreciation for its unique design and practicality, and widespread, severe criticism of its reliability, driving dynamics, and build quality.

9 problems reported (5 very frequent, 1 recurrent, 3 isolated) · high confidence

Problems owners report

  • Very frequentSevere and chronic electrical system failures

    Wiring harnesses melting (notably near the EGR valve), myriad unexplained electrical gremlins, dash lights dimming when braking, complete failures causing the vehicle to die while driving.

  • Very frequentAutomatic transmission failures

    Rough shifting, slipping, going into "limp mode," complete failure requiring rebuild or replacement; exacerbated by use of incorrect fluid.

  • Very frequentEngine performance and reliability problems

    Underpowered naturally aspirated 2.4L engine, poor fuel economy (low 20s MPG), head gasket issues, oil pressure sensor failures, stalling, and hesitation.

+ 6 more issuesShow fewer
  • Very frequentExtremely difficult and expensive to repair

    Engine bay packaging is slammed, requiring major disassembly for basic repairs like alternator replacement; cheap, fragile plastic parts; seized fasteners.

  • Very frequentPoor driving dynamics and safety

    Excessive body roll, vague handling, feels unstable and "rattly" at highway speeds (65-80 mph / 105-129 km/h), convertible models offer no rollover protection, general lack of driver confidence.

  • RecurrentInterior ergonomics and material quality

    Poorly placed controls (window switches on dashboard, radio near floor), cheap hard plastics, unsupportive seats, interior described as "Fisher Price" quality.

  • IsolatedConvertible top mechanism failures

    Power tops ceasing to function.

  • IsolatedIgnition switch failures

    Keys able to be removed while running, switches wearing out.

  • IsolatedFactory wheel issues

    Chrome plating flaking off, chronic air leaks.

The version owners recommend

Manual Transmission GT Turbo Model: Specifically the 2005 or older GT trim with the turbocharged 2.4L engine and manual transmission is cited as the most desirable and "fun" version, offering significantly more power and engagement. The naturally aspirated automatic models are overwhelmingly panned as underpowered and unreliable. The Limited trim with leather is also noted for its features. Convertible models are mentioned but come with significant concerns about structural rigidity and safety.

Competitors to consider

Owners compare it most often with the Chevrolet HHR, Dodge Neon, Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla and Chevrolet SSR.

Is the PT Cruiser right for you?

Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.

Ask about your car →
Full owner reportHide full owner report

Overall sentiment

Extremely polarized sentiment, split between nostalgic appreciation for its unique design and practicality, and widespread, severe criticism of its reliability, driving dynamics, and build quality. The vehicle is frequently described as a "future classic" for its daring, retro-styled appearance that generated significant hype and dealer markups at launch. Owners praise its spacious and comfortable interior, upright seating position, and unique character that stands out from conventional vehicles. However, the overwhelming consensus from long-term ownership experiences is negative, centering on chronic and severe mechanical and electrical failures. The vehicle is characterized as underpowered, poorly engineered for serviceability, and constructed with cheap interior materials that have not aged well. The driving experience is consistently criticized as unrefined, with poor handling, excessive body roll, and a lack of safety confidence, particularly in convertible models. Satisfaction appears highly dependent on tolerance for frequent repairs and a fondness for its unconventional aesthetics.

Positioning vs competitors

Positioned as a uniquely styled, retro-themed compact wagon against more conventional alternatives. The Chevrolet HHR is mentioned as a direct competitor that attempted a similar theme but is also criticized for poor reliability, with some owner feedback suggesting the HHR was even worse in certain aspects like steering safety. The platform is noted as being shared with the mainstream Dodge Neon, explaining many shared mechanical shortcomings. Compared to contemporary Japanese competitors like the Honda Civic or Toyota Corolla, the PT Cruiser is universally positioned as inferior in reliability, fuel economy, and build quality. The turbocharged manual GT model is occasionally compared to the Mini Cooper S for sharing a similar drivetrain, but is not considered a true performance competitor. It is ultimately seen as a style-over-substance vehicle that fails to deliver the durability expected of a daily driver.

Recommended configurations

Insufficient owner data available for a coherent list of recommended configurations. Isolated advice suggests seeking 2005 or older models for the turbo GT, and ensuring the correct ATF+4 transmission fluid is used for automatic models to avoid damage. A pre-purchase inspection by a mechanic familiar with Chrysler products is strongly implied by the widespread issue reports.

General recommendations

Only recommended for enthusiasts who value its unique, love-it-or-hate-it styling above all else and have a high tolerance for mechanical repairs, DIY capability, and low safety perceptions. NOT recommended as a primary, reliable daily driver, especially for those on a tight budget, commuting long distances, or requiring highway stability. Strongly advised to avoid high-mileage examples without extensive maintenance records. Potential buyers should budget significantly for ongoing repairs, particularly for electrical systems, transmissions, and engine components. A thorough pre-purchase inspection is critical. For learners or budget buyers, conventional Japanese compact cars are consistently presented as superior alternatives for reliability and cost of ownership.

Remarks

The PT Cruiser's reputation is defined by a stark dichotomy between its initial market success and its long-term ownership reality. Launch hype was significant, with dealer markups reported. The vehicle's platform and core mechanical components, shared with more mainstream Chrysler products of the era, are identified as the root of its reliability woes. The turbocharged GT manual model exists as a notable, rare exception praised for performance potential, but it does not redeem the model line's overarching reputation for poor build quality and engineering. Much of the contemporary discussion revolves around its status as a cultural icon or "worst car," rather than as a current transportation appliance, indicating most surviving examples are owned by enthusiasts or as secondary vehicles. Analysis based on approximately 85 substantive owner discussions and experiences.

Generation by generation

Owner insights per generation and US complaint/recall records (NHTSA).

Complaints and recalls by model yearWorst year: 2002. Years to avoid: 2002Source: NHTSA (US)Show table

Each year graded against the model's other years: Year Score. See all Chrysler PT Cruiser years to avoid

YearComplaintsRecallsMost-reported area
2010220engine
2009970electrical system
20081150electrical system
20071490air bags
20063731electrical system
20055125electrical system
20044343electrical system
20035164electrical system
20021,0505electrical system
20016307electrical system

Complaint counts come from owner reports filed with the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Higher-selling years naturally accumulate more complaints.

Recall notices25 on record · Source: NHTSA (US)Show recalls

2006 · visibility:glass, side/rearcampaign 07V149000

ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES, THE REAR QUARTER GLASS ATTACHING FASTENERS MAY PULL THROUGH THEIR MOUNTS AND ALLOW THE GLASS TO SEPARATE FROM THE VEHICLE.

2005 · suspensioncampaign 08E033000

FEDERAL MOGUL IS RECALLING 6,903 AFTERMARKET BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES SHIPPED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 9, 2007 AND MARCH 26, 2008, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS. THE PART NUMBERS PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS ARE: K7147, K7329, K8683, AND 104353. THESE PARTS WERE MADE FOR USE ON THE VARIOUS VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE.

2005 · exterior lightingcampaign 09E012000

SABERSPORT IS RECALLING 16,270 COMBINATION CORNER AND BUMPER LAMP ASSEMBLIES OF VARIOUS PART NUMBERS SOLD FOR USE AS AFTERMARKET EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE HEADLAMPS FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT." THESE LAMPS DO NOT CONTAIN THE REQUIRED AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS.

2005 · visibility:glass, side/rearcampaign 07V149000

ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES, THE REAR QUARTER GLASS ATTACHING FASTENERS MAY PULL THROUGH THEIR MOUNTS AND ALLOW THE GLASS TO SEPARATE FROM THE VEHICLE.

2005 · service brakes, hydraulic:antilock/traction control/electronic limited slipcampaign 04V481000

CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH 4-WHEEL ANTILOCK BRAKING SYSTEM (ABS), 2.4L HIGH OUTPUT TURBOCHARGED ENGINE, AND 5-SPEED MANUAL TRANSAXLE, MAY EXHIBIT INADEQUATE CLEARANCE BETWEEN THE LEFT FRONT BRAKE TUBE AND THE TRANSAXLE HOUSING.

2005 · steering:hydraulic power assist:hose, piping, and connectionscampaign 04V268000

ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH 2.4L NON-TURBOCHARGED ENGINES AND AUTOMATIC TRANSAXLES, THE POWER STEERING PRESSURE HOSE MAY CONTACT THE AUTOMATIC TRANSAXLE DIFFERENTIAL COVER, POTENTIALLY DAMAGING THE HOSE.

2004 · suspensioncampaign 08E033000

FEDERAL MOGUL IS RECALLING 6,903 AFTERMARKET BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES SHIPPED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 9, 2007 AND MARCH 26, 2008, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS. THE PART NUMBERS PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS ARE: K7147, K7329, K8683, AND 104353. THESE PARTS WERE MADE FOR USE ON THE VARIOUS VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE.

2004 · exterior lightingcampaign 09E012000

SABERSPORT IS RECALLING 16,270 COMBINATION CORNER AND BUMPER LAMP ASSEMBLIES OF VARIOUS PART NUMBERS SOLD FOR USE AS AFTERMARKET EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE HEADLAMPS FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT." THESE LAMPS DO NOT CONTAIN THE REQUIRED AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS.

2004 · steering:hydraulic power assist:hose, piping, and connectionscampaign 04V268000

ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH 2.4L NON-TURBOCHARGED ENGINES AND AUTOMATIC TRANSAXLES, THE POWER STEERING PRESSURE HOSE MAY CONTACT THE AUTOMATIC TRANSAXLE DIFFERENTIAL COVER, POTENTIALLY DAMAGING THE HOSE.

2003 · suspensioncampaign 08E033000

FEDERAL MOGUL IS RECALLING 6,903 AFTERMARKET BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES SHIPPED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 9, 2007 AND MARCH 26, 2008, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS. THE PART NUMBERS PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS ARE: K7147, K7329, K8683, AND 104353. THESE PARTS WERE MADE FOR USE ON THE VARIOUS VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE.

2003 · exterior lightingcampaign 09E012000

SABERSPORT IS RECALLING 16,270 COMBINATION CORNER AND BUMPER LAMP ASSEMBLIES OF VARIOUS PART NUMBERS SOLD FOR USE AS AFTERMARKET EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE HEADLAMPS FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT." THESE LAMPS DO NOT CONTAIN THE REQUIRED AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS.

2003 · steering:hydraulic power assist:hose, piping, and connectionscampaign 04V268000

ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH 2.4L NON-TURBOCHARGED ENGINES AND AUTOMATIC TRANSAXLES, THE POWER STEERING PRESSURE HOSE MAY CONTACT THE AUTOMATIC TRANSAXLE DIFFERENTIAL COVER, POTENTIALLY DAMAGING THE HOSE.

2003 · power train:clutch assemblycampaign 03V076000

ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES, MANUAL TRANSMISSION MODELS ONLY, A WELDED PIN INTERNAL TO THE DUAL-MASS FLYWHEEL (DMF) ASSEMBLY CAN UNSEAT AND BECOME LODGED BETWEEN THE FLYWHEEL AND THE CLUTCH DISC.

2002 · suspensioncampaign 08E033000

FEDERAL MOGUL IS RECALLING 6,903 AFTERMARKET BALL JOINT ASSEMBLIES SHIPPED BETWEEN NOVEMBER 9, 2007 AND MARCH 26, 2008, WHICH MAY HAVE BEEN PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS. THE PART NUMBERS PACKAGED WITH INCORRECT NUTS ARE: K7147, K7329, K8683, AND 104353. THESE PARTS WERE MADE FOR USE ON THE VARIOUS VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE.

2002 · exterior lightingcampaign 09E012000

SABERSPORT IS RECALLING 16,270 COMBINATION CORNER AND BUMPER LAMP ASSEMBLIES OF VARIOUS PART NUMBERS SOLD FOR USE AS AFTERMARKET EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE HEADLAMPS FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT." THESE LAMPS DO NOT CONTAIN THE REQUIRED AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS.

10 older recalls not shown. Check nhtsa.gov with your VIN for the full history.

Specifications

2.4 i 16V Turbo

220 hp

Built 2004–2010

Power220 Hp
0–62 mph (0–100 km/h)7.6 sec
Fuel (maker's test)24 mpg (9.9 L/100 km)
AspirationTurbocharger, Intercooler
Seats4 seats
Fuel typeGas
Body typeCabriolet

Explore this car

Analyze this car
  • Find an upgrade
  • Compare with another car
  • Not sure? Answer 5 quick questions

Quick facts

Brand
Chrysler
Versions catalogued
9
Body types
Cabriolet, Hatchback
Owner report
Available

Compare with

  • PT Cruiser vs Chevrolet HHR
  • PT Cruiser vs Dodge Neon
  • PT Cruiser vs Honda Civic
  • PT Cruiser vs Toyota Corolla

CarWizz

Car picks from owner reports, US listing prices and EPA data.

BrandsBest carsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&AYear ScoreStudiesQuizAbout
PrivacyTermsCookiesLegal notice

© 2026 CarWizz