Photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC)
Every generation
Power
0–62 mph (0–100 km/h)
Top speed (198 km/h)
Fuel, maker's test (11.5 L/100 km)
What owners say
Our take, from owner reports
Overwhelmingly negative sentiment based on long-term owner reports, with a strong consensus on poor reliability and frequent mechanical failures.
8 problems reported (3 very frequent, 5 recurrent) · high confidence
Problems owners report
- Very frequentEngine failures (multiple causes)
Includes blown head gaskets, severe oil sludge buildup (particularly in the 2.7L V6), low compression, misfires, and complete engine failure. The 2.7L V6 is specifically singled out as problematic.
- Very frequentTransmission failures
Includes complete breakdowns requiring replacement, persistent "limp-in" mode, solenoid and TCM (Transmission Control Module) failures, and fluid leaks from rusted pans/covers.
- Very frequentChronic electrical and starting problems
Includes no-spark conditions, faulty sensors (camshaft, crankshaft), bad ignition switches, parasitic draws, dead alternators, complex wiring faults, and issues where the vehicle cranks but will not start.
+ 5 more issuesShow fewer
- RecurrentCooling system failures
Includes overheating from cracked coolant hose connectors, clogged radiators, leaking water pumps, and air bubbles in the system leading to head gasket damage.
- RecurrentPoor build quality and rust
Noted for a "cheap" feel, use of poor-quality parts, and a propensity to rust severely.
- RecurrentPersistent drivability issues
Includes rough idling, stalling, lack of power/acceleration, and unburned fuel smell in the cabin. Often linked to failing sensors, fuel pumps, or EGR systems.
- RecurrentOil leaks and consumption
Common issue mentioned across multiple reports.
- RecurrentIntermittent and difficult-to-diagnose faults
Owners report throwing parts at problems without success, indicating complex, intertwined system failures.
The version owners recommend
Insufficient owner data available. No specific trim, year, or engine configuration is recommended as superior. The data suggests all versions, particularly those from the second generation (circa 2001-2006), are prone to significant issues.
Competitors to consider
Owners compare it most often with the Honda Accord, Toyota Camry, Toyota Corolla, Chevrolet Impala and Pontiac Sunfire.
Is the Stratus right for you?
Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.
Full owner reportHide full owner report
Overall sentiment
Overwhelmingly negative sentiment based on long-term owner reports, with a strong consensus on poor reliability and frequent mechanical failures. The vehicle is characterized as a "piece of shit" and a "total piecer" by multiple owners who experienced a relentless series of problems. While a few isolated reports mention achieving high mileage (over 200,000 miles) with a specific early 1990s model, these are outliers. The dominant narrative describes constant, expensive repairs that quickly exceed the vehicle's value, leading to frustration and abandonment. Common failure points include engines, transmissions, and complex electrical systems. The car is generally not recommended, with owners advising others to avoid it in favor of more reliable brands.
Positioning vs competitors
Positioned as an unreliable alternative within the domestic midsize sedan segment. It is unfavorably compared to contemporary Honda and Toyota products, which are cited as achieving 300,000-400,000+ miles with proper maintenance. It is also compared directly to its corporate siblings (Chrysler Cirrus, Plymouth Breeze, Dodge Avenger, Chrysler Sebring), which share its poor reputation. One owner noted it was an upgrade from a problematic Chevrolet Cavalier but still ultimately unsatisfactory. The consensus places it among the least reliable vehicles from a manufacturer (Chrysler) already perceived as having major quality issues during the DaimlerChrysler era.
Recommended configurations
Insufficient owner data available. No recommended configurations are mentioned. One owner of a related platform (Chrysler Sebring) advised meticulous maintenance, using high-quality oil, addressing leaks promptly, and applying undercoating to combat rust if ownership is unavoidable.
General recommendations
Not recommended for purchase. Owners strongly advise against buying this vehicle, especially used examples with unknown history. It is deemed unsuitable for those who depend on their car for daily commuting or work, as frequent breakdowns are reported. If acquired for a very low price out of necessity, owners suggest being prepared for constant repairs and budgeting for costs that will quickly surpass the car's value. It is considered a poor choice for college students or anyone needing reliable, low-cost transportation. Test driving is unlikely to reveal the chronic issues that manifest over time.
Remarks
The negative reputation is heavily tied to the DaimlerChrysler era (late 1990s to mid-2000s), with owners stating the company's reliability "absolutely nosedived" during this period due to the use of inferior parts. The 2.7L V6 engine, developed during this time and used in the Stratus and related models (Sebring, LH cars), is infamous for oil sludge problems that can destroy the engine, though some mitigation was attempted in later production years (circa 2005+). The vehicle shares its platform and many components with the Chrysler Cirrus, Plymouth Breeze, Dodge Stratus, and Chrysler Sebring, collectively known as the "cloud cars." Analysis is based on approximately 35 substantive owner discussions spanning over a decade, indicating these reliability problems are a persistent, long-term characteristic of the model.
Specifications
Enthusiast code: JA
Not sold in North America: these versions are from other markets.
2.5 LX V6
2.5L 6-cylinder · 163 hp · FWD · automatic
Built 1995–2000