Photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC)
Power
0–62 mph (0–100 km/h)
Top speed (214 km/h)
Fuel, maker's test (12.4 L/100 km)
What owners say
Our take, from owner reports
Sentiment is mixed, leaning towards negative, based on long-term owner reports.
4 problems reported (2 recurrent, 2 isolated) · medium confidence
Problems owners report
- RecurrentGeneral poor reliability and quality
Described as "complete piles of shit," prone to significant mechanical failures.
- RecurrentTransmission reliability concerns
While one owner reported no issues, the model's platform is broadly associated with transmission problems.
- IsolatedPower steering system failures
Mentioned as a specific problem area on one 3.3L-equipped model.
+ 1 more issueShow fewer
- IsolatedInterior and accessory quality issues
Use of cheaper components and cost-cutting measures noted (e.g., incorrect tachometer redline on base models).
The version owners recommend
Insufficient owner data available. One owner noted jealousy towards the higher-revving 3.5L engine found in the related Chrysler LHS model compared to the base 3.3L in their Eagle Vision ESi.
Is the Vision right for you?
Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.
Full owner reportHide full owner report
Overall sentiment
Sentiment is mixed, leaning towards negative, based on long-term owner reports. The vehicle is acknowledged for its spacious and comfortable interior, smooth ride quality, and distinctive styling for a four-door sedan of its era. Some owners express fondness for its appearance and the adequate low-end torque from its base 3.3L V6 engine. However, the consensus strongly indicates that these were not good cars in terms of long-term reliability. They are repeatedly described as "complete piles of shit" and prone to significant mechanical and quality issues. The brand's reputation for poor reliability is frequently attached to this model. Satisfaction appears highly dependent on individual luck with specific components, particularly the transmission.
Positioning vs competitors
Insufficient owner data available.
Recommended configurations
Insufficient owner data available.
General recommendations
Not recommended based on historical reliability concerns. Owners strongly advise staying away from Chrysler products from this era. For a used vehicle of this age, the recommendation is to bring it to a mechanic familiar with the specific make and model for a pre-purchase inspection. The vehicle may only be suitable for enthusiasts or those with low cost expectations and high tolerance for repairs.
Remarks
The Chrysler Vision was part of the LH-platform "cab-forward" sedans (including Intrepid, Concorde, 300M, LHS, New Yorker) from the 1990s and early 2000s. These vehicles were based on a 1980s Renault front-wheel-drive platform. They were praised contemporaneously for interior space, comfort, refinement, and value but are now widely regarded by the owner community as fundamentally unreliable. The Eagle Vision was a badge-engineered variant sold under the Eagle brand. Owner feedback is retrospective, based on experiences from decades ago, and no data is available on current ownership or market status. Analysis based on approximately 8 substantive owner discussions referencing the model.
Specifications
Not sold in North America: these versions are from other markets.
3.5 TSi
3.5L 6-cylinder · 211 hp · FWD · automatic
Built 1993–1997