Photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC)
Every generation
Power
0–62 mph (0–100 km/h)
Top speed (330 km/h)
Combined, EPA 2026
What owners say
Our take, from owner reports
Mixed to negative sentiment overall, with a sharp divide between the car's driving dynamics and its long-term ownership prospects.
5 problems reported (2 very frequent, 2 recurrent) · high confidence
Problems owners report
- Very frequentHybrid powertrain reliability concerns
Described as a "reliability nightmare," with fears of complex systems failing and leading to lengthy workshop visits; cited as a primary reason for depreciation.
- Very frequentSignificant depreciation
Reported to have "depreciated a lot," with used values falling below those of the older F8 Tributo; attributed to the V6 engine and hybrid system which are perceived as less desirable by the traditional Ferrari buyer demographic.
- RecurrentLack of emotional/auditory experience
Criticism that the powertrain, while technically brilliant, doesn't deliver the visceral, emotional experience expected from a Ferrari, especially compared to its V8 and V12 predecessors.
+ 2 more issuesShow fewer
- RecurrentHigh cost of ownership and maintenance
Concerns over expensive repairs for the hybrid system, with a noted lack of independent shops currently equipped to service it, potentially forcing reliance on dealerships.
- Reported Issues (continued)
The version owners recommend
Insufficient owner data available to designate a best version. Owner discussions reference the standard 296 GTB and the anticipated track-focused "Versione Speciale" (VS) variant, but no consensus emerges on a preferred trim. The Speciale Aperta (convertible) is noted as being more limited and potentially harder to acquire than the coupe VS model.
Competitors to consider
Owners compare it most often with the McLaren Artura, McLaren 720S/750S, STO, Tecnica) and Lamborghini Temerario.
Is the 296 right for you?
Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.
Full owner reportHide full owner report
Overall sentiment
Mixed to negative sentiment overall, with a sharp divide between the car's driving dynamics and its long-term ownership prospects. The vehicle is widely praised by owners as an "engineering masterstroke" and "absolute dream to drive," with specific acclaim for its substantial performance improvements over predecessors like the 488 and F8, including better handling, quicker acceleration, and superior braking. It is described as surprisingly usable for daily driving and long road trips, offering comfort, refinement, and modern technology. However, this positive driving experience is heavily overshadowed by very frequent and severe criticism regarding the hybrid powertrain's reliability, described as a "reliability nightmare" and "quite problematic." This concern, coupled with significant reported depreciation and fears over long-term maintenance costs for the complex hybrid system, creates a consensus of apprehension. The car is seen as a spectacular but financially risky proposition that may depreciate sharply and become expensive to maintain outside of warranty.
Positioning vs competitors
Positioned as a more polished, premium, and technologically advanced product compared to the McLaren Artura, which is seen as a direct V6 hybrid rival but with more frequent reliability issues and a less premium interior. Compared to the Porsche 911, the 296 is viewed as flashier, more dramatic, and offering a greater sense of occasion, but potentially less practical for daily use and with a less predictable ownership cost structure. Versus its Ferrari predecessors (488, F8), the 296 is considered a substantial performance leap but trades the simpler, naturally aspirated V8 for a complex hybrid V6, which is a point of contention for enthusiasts and a cited reason for its poor residual values. The car's hybrid complexity and associated reliability fears are frequently contrasted with the perceived bulletproof reliability of models like the Lamborghini Huracan.
Recommended configurations
Insufficient specific configuration advice from owners. One mention suggests the optional LED steering wheel is a "must-have." General purchase advice centers on buying used to avoid steep initial depreciation, with one owner reporting purchasing a used example with low mileage. There is no consensus on transmission type, drivetrain, or specific option packages.
General recommendations
Suitable for driving enthusiasts seeking a dramatic, high-performance mid-engine experience with modern hybrid technology and daily usability. Strongly recommended for purchase only with a comprehensive warranty due to widespread concerns over hybrid system reliability. Consider purchasing used to mitigate significant initial depreciation, as many lightly used examples are reported to be available below original MSRP. NOT recommended for buyers prioritizing investment potential or low long-term cost of ownership, as the V6 hybrid powertrain is perceived to negatively impact residuals and future reliability. Prospective buyers are advised to research independent repair shop capability for the hybrid system and to budget for potentially high maintenance costs post-warranty. An extended warranty or manufacturer maintenance plan (Ferrari's 7-year plan is noted) is considered essential.
Remarks
The owner sentiment is fundamentally split between the car's acclaimed driving dynamics and its perceived ownership liabilities. The hybrid V6 powertrain, while lauded for its performance, is the central point of criticism, driving fears about reliability and resale value. This has led to a market scenario where used 296 GTBs are reported to be readily available and have depreciated significantly, making them more accessible but also seen as a financial risk. The comparison to McLaren's market and reliability struggles is explicitly drawn by multiple owners, suggesting a fear that the 296 could follow a similar trajectory. Analysis based on approximately 50 substantive owner discussions and comparisons.
Specifications
3.0 V6 Plug-in Hybrid F1
Plug-in hybrid · 880 hp · RWD · automatic
Built 2025–2026