Power
0–62 mph (0–100 km/h)
Top speed (214 km/h)
Combined, EPA 2020
Our take, from owner reports
Owner sentiment is generally positive, with the vehicle appreciated as a fun, stylish, and practical roadster.
5 problems reported (1 recurrent, 4 isolated) · medium confidence
Noticeable delay in throttle response compared to naturally aspirated rivals.
Diaphragm in stock valve can develop leaks; considered a preventive maintenance item.
The 1.4L engine does not like to sit for long periods (weeks); requires regular starting or a specific priming procedure.
Attempts to enable features like Apple CarPlay via aftermarket tweaks can brick the unit, requiring complex recovery.
Being a very small, low convertible creates unnerving situations in traffic with larger SUVs and trucks.
Insufficient owner data available to declare a consensus "best" trim. The Abarth version is mentioned for its enhanced character, but specific trim comparisons (Lusso, Classica, Abarth) are not detailed in the provided feedback.
Owners compare it most often with the Mazda MX-5 Miata (all ND generations), Toyota MR2 (SW20), Porsche Boxster (986, 987), BMW Z4 (E85) and Honda S2000.
Is the 124 Spider right for you?
Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.
Owner sentiment is generally positive, with the vehicle appreciated as a fun, stylish, and practical roadster. It is widely recognized as being built on the Mazda MX-5 (ND) platform, sharing its chassis, interior, and many components, which is seen as a significant positive for reliability and parts compatibility. The turbocharged 1.4L MultiAir engine in the modern model is noted for its stout character and tuning potential, though it is frequently compared unfavorably to the naturally aspirated Mazda engine in terms of low-end power and throttle response due to noticeable turbo lag. The car is praised for its extra luggage space compared to the MX-5, more subdued styling, and as a spiritual successor to earlier turbocharged roadsters. However, its driving experience is often described as having an added layer of insulation over the MX-5, making it a more relaxed, less raw alternative. Satisfaction appears high among owners who value its unique character and shared MX-5 underpinnings.
Positioned directly against, and most frequently compared to, the Mazda MX-5. It is seen as a more stylish, slightly more practical, and more relaxed-touring version of the same fundamental sports car, trading some of the MX-5's immediacy and high-revving nature for turbocharged torque and different aesthetics. Compared to other small roadsters like the Toyota MR2 or BMW Z4, it is viewed as a more modern, reliable, and daily-driver-friendly option due to its MX-5 lineage. Against more powerful coupes like the Mustang or Camaro, it is acknowledged as being significantly slower in a straight line but superior in lightweight, tossable handling. The consensus is that it offers a compelling alternative for buyers who want the MX-5's excellent chassis but prefer turbo power or Italian styling.
Manual transmission is strongly implied as the preferred choice for engagement. All-wheel drive is not applicable (RWD only). For the modern 1.4L turbo model, owners recommend preventive maintenance upgrades: an aftermarket blow-off valve (Forge, Turbosmart) to address potential stock valve leakage, and an oil catch can. Premium fuel (91+ octane) is recommended despite the engine accepting regular. For winter driving in snowy climates, high-quality all-weather tires (e.g., Michelin CrossClimate 2) are reported to provide excellent capability, with the emphasis placed on tire choice over drivetrain. For modifications, the extensive parts compatibility with the ND-generation Mazda MX-5 for suspension, wheels, brakes, and interior components is highlighted as a major advantage.
Suitable for buyers seeking a stylish, lightweight, convertible sports car with good practicality for its class. Ideal for daily driving, including in winter conditions with appropriate tires. A strong choice for those who appreciate the MX-5 platform but want a different aesthetic or turbocharged engine character. Highly recommended for enthusiasts interested in modifications due to vast parts commonality with the MX-5. A pre-purchase inspection is advised for used examples. Not recommended for those who prioritize the most immediate throttle response or highest-revving naturally aspirated engine, where the MX-5 is preferred. Prospective buyers should test drive both the 124 Spider and the MX-5 to feel the difference in powertrain response.
The modern (2016-2020) Fiat 124 Spider is fundamentally a Mazda MX-5 ND with different bodywork and a Fiat-sourced 1.4L turbocharged engine. This relationship is the central point of all owner discussions, framing its strengths (chassis, reliability, parts) and its primary differentiator (engine character). The engine is shared with other Fiat Chrysler vehicles like the Dodge Dart and Jeep Renegade, which informs perceptions of its reliability and parts availability. There is no mention in the provided data of widespread mechanical failures, major reliability issues, or model year changes, suggesting general satisfaction with the shared MX-5 fundamentals. Discussion of the classic 124 Spider (1970s-1980s) is minimal and focused on specific model year changes (e.g., 1979 transition to a 2-liter engine, electrical grounding points), which should be considered a separate vehicle entirely. Analysis based on approximately 24 substantive owner discussions.
Enthusiast code: 2016
1.4 MultiAir
1.4L 4-cylinder · 140 hp · RWD · automatic
Built 2016–2026