Ford Focus 1st generation (1998–2005)
Generation-specific owner insights from 155+ substantive owner discussions, with US complaint and recall records.
Should I buy a 1998–2005 Focus?
8,570
US owner complaints (NHTSA), 1998–2005
58
recall campaigns
electrical system
most-complained area
What owners say about this generation
Our take, from owner reports
Owners of the 1998-2005 Focus generally describe it as a cheap, reliable, and fun-to-drive economy car that handles better than most competitors in its class.
23 problems reported (1 very frequent, 12 recurrent, 10 isolated) · high confidence
Problems owners report
- Very frequentPlastic thermostat housing cracks and leaks
- RecurrentPlastic coolant crossover tube cracks and causes overheating
- RecurrentFront sway bar end links wear out and clunk over bumps
+ 20 more issuesShow fewer
- RecurrentRight front engine mount fails regularly
- RecurrentSPI engine drops valve seats around 80,000 miles
- RecurrentAlternator pigtail connector fails, causing alternator symptoms
- RecurrentClutch master cylinder leaks brake fluid under the dash around 70,000-80,000 miles
- RecurrentInstrument cluster solder cracks causing stalling, no-start, misfire, and random electrical issues
- RecurrentRust, especially in road-salt regions
- RecurrentShocks and struts wear fairly quickly
- RecurrentFuel pressure regulator or check valve leaks pressure back to the tank
Causing long cranks after sitting.
- RecurrentRough idle traced to dirty MAF, IAC, PCV hoses, or vacuum leaks
- RecurrentAutomatic transmission does not handle abuse or neglect well
- IsolatedRearview mirror and interior plastic parts break easily
- IsolatedWiring in the trunk to rear lights wears from opening and closing
- IsolatedA plug above the driver footwell can be kicked loose and cut power to the car
- IsolatedStarter solenoid intermittent connection causes no-start
- IsolatedClogged fuel filler vent tube or EVAP system issues
- IsolatedMotorcraft coil packs fail
- IsolatedAirbag/SRS system disables itself
- IsolatedPower steering pump failure
- IsolatedCruise control cable failure
- IsolatedDistributor coil
Speed sensor, instrument panel, catalytic converter, relays and fuses replaced at high mileage.
The version owners recommend
Owners consistently rank the 2.3L Duratec as the most reliable engine because it uses a timing chain instead of a belt, and the 2005 model year is repeatedly called out as the most reliable thanks to the Duratec and revised interior. The 2.0L DOHC Zetec is considered reliable with normal maintenance, while the 2.0L SOHC SPI is ranked worst for reliability. The 2.0L SVT Zetec (ZX3/ZX5) is the most powerful at 170 hp but is assumed to have been driven hard.
Competitors to consider
Owners compare it most often with the Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Toyota Corolla, Mazda3 and Nissan Maxima.
Is a 1998–2005 Focus right for you?
Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.
Full owner reportHide full owner report
Overall sentiment
Owners of the 1998-2005 Focus generally describe it as a cheap, reliable, and fun-to-drive economy car that handles better than most competitors in its class. Praise centers on the durable Zetec and Duratec engines, excellent fuel economy (one owner averaged about 32 mpg over the car's lifetime), and low running costs, with many examples reported past 150,000-230,000 miles. Criticism focuses on cooling system failures (plastic thermostat housings and coolant crossover tubes), front suspension and motor mount wear, and the SPI engine's tendency to drop valve seats. Several owners note that early cars (2000-2001) had more recalls and "gremlins," while 2002-2003 and later cars were considered better built, and the 2005 facelift with the 2.3L Duratec is often called the most reliable version.
Positioning vs competitors
Owners position the Focus as the cheaper, better-handling alternative to a Civic or Corolla, and several say that at the $2,500-$3,000 price point a Focus is often better kept than a rusted-out or high-mileage Toyota or Honda. Against the Accord, owners note that the Accord of that era had automatic transmission problems while the Focus mainly needs an alternator, and that 80,000 fewer miles matters more than brand reputation. The SVT model is discussed as a performance bargain, though owners warn that SVT transmission rebuilds are hard to obtain. Against the Mazda3, the 2.3L Duratec is noted as similar to the Mazda engine.
Recommended configurations
Owners strongly recommend the manual transmission over the automatic, citing automatic transmission durability concerns and calling the Duratec/Zetec plus manual drivetrain "solid." The 2.3L Duratec with a five-speed is repeatedly praised, as is the 2.0L Zetec with a manual. Owners advise avoiding the SPI engine and advise checking that the timing belt has been replaced on belt-driven engines (recommended interval cited as 90,000-120,000 miles).
General recommendations
This generation suits first-time drivers, students, and anyone wanting a cheap, economical daily commuter or winter beater, and owners say it is a good choice if you do not live in the rust belt. Prefer 2002-2005 cars, especially 2005 with the 2.3L Duratec, and be cautious with 2000-2001 models due to recalls and early gremlins. On inspection, check for rust underneath, verify timing belt service on Zetec and SPI engines, check the clutch and timing belt on an SVT, inspect the cooling system, and get a pre-purchase inspection with service records. Owners consider $4,300 too much for a 180,000-mile 2003 SVT and $5,000 high for a 20-year-old car, while around $2,500-$3,000 is seen as fair.
Remarks
Owners repeatedly note that the Focus was a very high-production car, so parts are cheap and widely available, and that many examples are still seen on the road. The 2005 model year is described as having a facelift and revised interior. Some owners caution that the automatic transmission is the weak point and that neglected or abused automatics are best avoided. Analysis based on approximately 155 substantive owner discussions about this generation.
Complaints and recalls by model year
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Most-reported area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 441 | 5 | electrical system |
| 2004 | 387 | 6 | electrical system |
| 2003 | 1,017 | 7 | electrical system |
| 2002 | 1,018 | 8 | electrical system |
| 2001 | 1,815 | 14 | electrical system |
| 2000 | 3,881 | 18 | electrical system |
| 1999 | 11 | 0 | engine and engine cooling |
Source: US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Higher-selling years naturally accumulate more complaints.
Recall notices for this generation
2005 · equipmentcampaign 12E007000
RIDE CONTROL, LLC (RIDE CONTROL) IS RECALLING CERTAIN READYMOUNT ASSEMBLIES, P/N 746641MT AND 746646MT, WITH CORRESPONDING AFTERMARKET CUSTOMER PART NUMBERS: GABRIEL G56944 AND GABRIEL G56945, AND PRIVATELY BRANDED PARTSMASTER WITH PART NUMBERS G68944 AND G68945. THE READYMOUNT ASSEMBLIES WERE SOLD AS AFTERMARKET SERVICE EQUIPMENT FOR USE ON CERTAIN 2000 THROUGH 2005 FORD FOCUS VEHICLES. THESE ASSEMBLIES WERE ASSEMBLED WITH A NUT WITHOUT THE NECESSARY WASHER. THE ABSENCE OF THE WASHER CAN ALLOW THE READYMOUNT ASSEMBLY TO PULL APART THE TOP MOUNT.
2005 · latches/locks/linkages:doors:latchcampaign 05V030000
CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES WITH FOUR OR FIVE DOORS AND ORIGINALLY SOLD IN OR CURRENTLY REGISTERED IN CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, IOWA, MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT, WEST VIRGINIA, WISCONSIN, AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, A BUILD-UP OF CORROSION AT THE PAWL PIVOT AREA OF THE REAR DOOR LATCH CAN CAUSE A BINDING CONDITION OF THE PAWL THAT MAY AFFECT PROPER ENGAGEMENT OF THE PAWL INTO THE CATCH. THE OCCUPANT MAY EXPERIENCE DIFFICULTY OPENING OR CLOSING A REAR DOOR, AND EVENTUALLY THE REAR DOOR MAY NOT LATCH PROPERLY.
2005 · exterior lighting:headlightscampaign 08E050000
K2 MOTOR IS RECALLING 1,921 AFTERMARKET HEADLAMPS OF VARIOUS MODELS SOLD FOR USE ON THE ABOVE LISTED VEHICLES. THESE HEADLAMPS ARE MISSING THE AMBER SIDE REFLEX REFLECTOR WHICH FAILS TO CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT."
2005 · fuel system, gasolinecampaign 06E056000
CERTAIN AFTERMARKET FUEL FILTERS SOLD UNDER THE PUROLATOR BRAND NAME, P/N F65277, SHIPPED FROM JANUARY 16 THROUGH JUNE 2, 2006, FOR USE ON THE ABOVE LISTED PASSENGER VEHICLES. DUE TO INCORRECT DESIGN, THE QUICK CONNECTORS MAY NOT FULLY SEAT WITH THE TUBE INTERFACE, EVEN THOUGH THE PERSON MAKING THE CONNECTION MAY BELIEVE THAT THE QUICK CONNECTOR IS FULLY ATTACHED.
2005 · exterior lightingcampaign 06E026000
CERTAIN PRO-A MOTORS CORNER LAMPS, TURN SIGNALS, AND HEADLIGHTS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
2004 · equipmentcampaign 12E007000
RIDE CONTROL, LLC (RIDE CONTROL) IS RECALLING CERTAIN READYMOUNT ASSEMBLIES, P/N 746641MT AND 746646MT, WITH CORRESPONDING AFTERMARKET CUSTOMER PART NUMBERS: GABRIEL G56944 AND GABRIEL G56945, AND PRIVATELY BRANDED PARTSMASTER WITH PART NUMBERS G68944 AND G68945. THE READYMOUNT ASSEMBLIES WERE SOLD AS AFTERMARKET SERVICE EQUIPMENT FOR USE ON CERTAIN 2000 THROUGH 2005 FORD FOCUS VEHICLES. THESE ASSEMBLIES WERE ASSEMBLED WITH A NUT WITHOUT THE NECESSARY WASHER. THE ABSENCE OF THE WASHER CAN ALLOW THE READYMOUNT ASSEMBLY TO PULL APART THE TOP MOUNT.
2004 · latches/locks/linkages:doors:latchcampaign 05V030000
CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES WITH FOUR OR FIVE DOORS AND ORIGINALLY SOLD IN OR CURRENTLY REGISTERED IN CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, ILLINOIS, INDIANA, IOWA, MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MICHIGAN, MINNESOTA, MISSOURI, NEW HAMPSHIRE, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK, OHIO, PENNSYLVANIA, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT, WEST VIRGINIA, WISCONSIN, AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, A BUILD-UP OF CORROSION AT THE PAWL PIVOT AREA OF THE REAR DOOR LATCH CAN CAUSE A BINDING CONDITION OF THE PAWL THAT MAY AFFECT PROPER ENGAGEMENT OF THE PAWL INTO THE CATCH. THE OCCUPANT MAY EXPERIENCE DIFFICULTY OPENING OR CLOSING A REAR DOOR, AND EVENTUALLY THE REAR DOOR MAY NOT LATCH PROPERLY.
2004 · exterior lighting:headlightscampaign 08E050000
K2 MOTOR IS RECALLING 1,921 AFTERMARKET HEADLAMPS OF VARIOUS MODELS SOLD FOR USE ON THE ABOVE LISTED VEHICLES. THESE HEADLAMPS ARE MISSING THE AMBER SIDE REFLEX REFLECTOR WHICH FAILS TO CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT."
2004 · exterior lighting:headlightscampaign 09E025000
DOPE, INC. IS RECALLING 42,540 COMBINATION CORNER AND BUMPER LAMP ASSEMBLIES OF VARIOUS PART NUMBERS SOLD FOR USE AS AFTERMARKET EQUIPMENT FOR VARIOUS PASSENGER VEHICLES. THESE HEADLAMPS FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, "LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT." THESE LAMPS DO NOT CONTAIN THE REQUIRED AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS.
2004 · fuel system, gasolinecampaign 06E056000
CERTAIN AFTERMARKET FUEL FILTERS SOLD UNDER THE PUROLATOR BRAND NAME, P/N F65277, SHIPPED FROM JANUARY 16 THROUGH JUNE 2, 2006, FOR USE ON THE ABOVE LISTED PASSENGER VEHICLES. DUE TO INCORRECT DESIGN, THE QUICK CONNECTORS MAY NOT FULLY SEAT WITH THE TUBE INTERFACE, EVEN THOUGH THE PERSON MAKING THE CONNECTION MAY BELIEVE THAT THE QUICK CONNECTOR IS FULLY ATTACHED.
2004 · exterior lightingcampaign 06E026000
CERTAIN PRO-A MOTORS CORNER LAMPS, TURN SIGNALS, AND HEADLIGHTS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
2003 · equipmentcampaign 12E007000
RIDE CONTROL, LLC (RIDE CONTROL) IS RECALLING CERTAIN READYMOUNT ASSEMBLIES, P/N 746641MT AND 746646MT, WITH CORRESPONDING AFTERMARKET CUSTOMER PART NUMBERS: GABRIEL G56944 AND GABRIEL G56945, AND PRIVATELY BRANDED PARTSMASTER WITH PART NUMBERS G68944 AND G68945. THE READYMOUNT ASSEMBLIES WERE SOLD AS AFTERMARKET SERVICE EQUIPMENT FOR USE ON CERTAIN 2000 THROUGH 2005 FORD FOCUS VEHICLES. THESE ASSEMBLIES WERE ASSEMBLED WITH A NUT WITHOUT THE NECESSARY WASHER. THE ABSENCE OF THE WASHER CAN ALLOW THE READYMOUNT ASSEMBLY TO PULL APART THE TOP MOUNT.
14 more recalls not shown. Check nhtsa.gov with your VIN for the full history.
Owner insights summarize real ownership discussions for this generation only. Complaint and recall data is public NHTSA (US) information. Always verify recalls against your VIN at nhtsa.gov.