Photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC)
Every generation
Power
What owners say
Our take, from owner reports
Sentiment is mixed and heavily dependent on the specific generation and powertrain.
8 problems reported (5 recurrent, 3 isolated) · medium confidence
Problems owners report
- Recurrent4.0L SOHC V6 timing chain system rattle/failure
Primary chain rattle noise at 2000-3000 RPM, potential for catastrophic failure requiring engine removal for rear chain service.
- Recurrent5R55E transmission reliability
Noted for failures and being a "lighter duty" transmission; one owner reported a vehicle having its third transmission replaced.
- RecurrentFront suspension and steering component wear
Ball joints, CV axles, and other components wear out, limiting lift potential and requiring frequent maintenance.
+ 5 more issuesShow fewer
- RecurrentFuel system issues
Cracked fuel sending units, failing fuel pump driver modules, and stalling problems (especially on 2002 models) are commonly cited.
- RecurrentElectrical gremlins
Wiring issues behind the dashboard, faulty instrument clusters causing stalling or false warnings, and persistent "AdvanceTrac" system faults.
- IsolatedRadiator failure (first-gen V6)
Stock 20psi radiator cap cited as causing repeated radiator failures; mitigated by switching to a 16psi cap.
- IsolatedSpark plug ejection (4.6L 3V V8)
Risk of spark plugs breaking or being ejected due to insufficient threads; addressed by a TSB for engines built before 11/30/07.
- IsolatedDrive shaft carrier bearing failure (AWD models)
Non-serviceable bearing requiring complete drive shaft replacement.
The version owners recommend
Second-generation models (2007-2010) equipped with the 4.6L V8 and 6R80 6-speed automatic transmission. This powertrain is repeatedly cited as superior in reliability and performance to the 4.0L V6 and 5-speed automatic. The Adrenalin trim is noted for its distinctive styling and is often sought after, though concerns are raised about paying a premium for what is fundamentally a dressed-up Explorer.
Competitors to consider
Owners compare it most often with the Ford Ranger, Chevrolet Silverado 1500, Honda Ridgeline, GMC Envoy XUV and Chevrolet Avalanche.
Is the Sport Trac right for you?
Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.
Full owner reportHide full owner report
Overall sentiment
Sentiment is mixed and heavily dependent on the specific generation and powertrain. The vehicle is frequently described as a practical, comfortable, and nostalgic "car-truck thingy" that blends passenger space with light utility, often praised for its sliding rear window and comfortable interior derived from the Explorer. However, significant and recurrent criticism centers on mechanical reliability, particularly concerning the 4.0L SOHC V6 engine and its associated 5R55E transmission. The V8-powered second-generation models (2007-2010) are generally viewed more favorably for reliability, though they are noted to be more expensive and harder to find. The consensus indicates the Sport Trac is appreciated as a unique, usable vehicle when purchased cheaply and maintained proactively, but it is not regarded as a paragon of long-term, trouble-free ownership, especially in V6 form.
Positioning vs competitors
Positioned as a crew-cab alternative to the traditional Ford Ranger, offering more passenger comfort and interior space at the expense of a smaller, less utilitarian bed. Compared to full-size trucks like the Chevrolet Silverado 1500, it is seen as less capable for towing and hauling but more manageable and fuel-efficient. The Honda Ridgeline is mentioned as a more reliable and capable modern successor for similar use cases. The GMC Envoy XUV and Chevrolet Avalanche are cited as competitors with more innovative and practical bed solutions (midgate, sliding rear window, power washable bed), which some owners feel made the Sport Trac's design seem half-hearted by comparison.
Recommended configurations
V8 engine with 6-speed automatic transmission is strongly recommended over the V6 for long-term reliability. 4WD/AWD is suggested for winter conditions. For first-generation V6 models (2001-2005), preventative maintenance such as replacing the radiator cap with a 16psi unit (from the stock 20psi) to prevent radiator failure is mentioned. Checking the manufacturing date for spark plug removal TSBs on 4.6L 3V engines (built before 11/30/07) is advised. Avoiding vehicles with structural damage or persistent warning lights (e.g., ABS, AdvanceTrac) is recommended.
General recommendations
Suitable as a budget-friendly, used utility vehicle for light-duty tasks, commuting, and young drivers, provided purchase price is low ($1,200-$6,000 range mentioned) and funds are reserved for repairs. Not recommended as a primary, low-maintenance vehicle for owners seeking a "set it and forget it" ownership experience, especially the V6 models. Essential to have a pre-purchase inspection focusing on the transmission, timing chain system (V6), front suspension, and fuel system. Owners should be prepared for intermittent electrical issues and common failure points like the third brake light seal, fuel pump driver module, and instrument cluster wiring. Aggressive negotiation is advised due to known reliability concerns impacting resale value.
Remarks
Owner discussions span two distinct generations: the first generation (2001-2005) based on the Explorer/Ranger platform with a 4.0L V6, and the second generation (2007-2010) with updated styling and available 4.6L V8. Feedback is heavily bifurcated along these lines, with the V8 models receiving markedly more positive remarks regarding drivetrain robustness. The vehicle's purpose is frequently debated, with some seeing it as a compromised truck with a tiny bed and low payload, while others appreciate its unique blend of passenger comfort and light utility. Analysis is based on approximately 30 substantive owner discussions, with a notable portion focusing on troubleshooting specific mechanical problems rather than general ownership impressions.
Generation by generation
Owner insights per generation and US complaint/recall records (NHTSA).
Complaints and recalls by model yearWorst year: 2002. Years to avoid: 2004, 2003, 2002Source: NHTSA (US)Show table
Each year graded against the model's other years: Year Score. See all Ford Sport Trac years to avoid
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Most-reported area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 31 | 1 | power train |
| 2009 | 6 | 0 | power train |
| 2008 | 23 | 1 | power train |
| 2007 | 100 | 1 | power train |
| 2005 | 568 | 1 | structure |
| 2004 | 1,408 | 2 | power train |
| 2003 | 1,313 | 1 | structure |
| 2002 | 3,622 | 4 | power train |
Complaint counts come from owner reports filed with the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Higher-selling years naturally accumulate more complaints.
Recall notices11 on record · Source: NHTSA (US)Show recalls
2010 · seats:front assembly:reclinercampaign 10V161000
FORD IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2010 FUSION, EXPLORER, EXPLORER SPORT TRAC, AND MERCURY MILAN AND MOUNTAINEER VEHICLES MANUFACTURED BETWEEN DECEMBER 15, 2009 THROUGH FEBRUARY 3, 2010 EQUIPPED WITH FRONT SEAT MANUAL RECLINERS. THESE VEHICLES FAIL TO COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 202, "HEAD RESTRAINT." THE RECLINER GEAR PLATE TEETH MAY BE OUT OF DIMENSION SPECIFICATION WHICH COULD RESULT IN LIMITED PAWL TO GEAR PLATE TOOTH ENGAGEMENT.
2008 · power train:automatic transmission:cooling unit and linescampaign 07V453000
ON CERTAIN SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH THE 4.6L ENGINE AND 6R TRANSMISSION, THE BOLT SECURING THE TRANSMISSION OIL COOLER LINE FITTINGS AT THE TRANSMISSION MAY NOT HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENTLY TORQUED DURING VEHICLE ASSEMBLY. AS A RESULT, THE BOLT MAY LOOSEN AND THE TRANSMISSION OIL COOLER LINES MAY DISENGAGE FROM THE TRANSMISSION, CAUSING A TRANSMISSION FLUID LEAK.
2007 · steeringcampaign 07V181000
ON CERTAIN SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, THE TWO BOLTS THAT ATTACH THE STEERING GEAR ASSEMBLY TO THE FRAME MAY HAVE BEEN OVER-TIGHTENED. THIS CONDITION COULD RESULT IN ONE OR BOTH OF THE BOLTS FRACTURING, CAUSING THE STEERING GEAR TO BECOME LOOSE.
2005 · exterior lightingcampaign 06E026000
CERTAIN PRO-A MOTORS CORNER LAMPS, TURN SIGNALS, AND HEADLIGHTS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
2004 · fuel system, gasolinecampaign 06E056000
CERTAIN AFTERMARKET FUEL FILTERS SOLD UNDER THE PUROLATOR BRAND NAME, P/N F65277, SHIPPED FROM JANUARY 16 THROUGH JUNE 2, 2006, FOR USE ON THE ABOVE LISTED PASSENGER VEHICLES. DUE TO INCORRECT DESIGN, THE QUICK CONNECTORS MAY NOT FULLY SEAT WITH THE TUBE INTERFACE, EVEN THOUGH THE PERSON MAKING THE CONNECTION MAY BELIEVE THAT THE QUICK CONNECTOR IS FULLY ATTACHED.
2004 · exterior lightingcampaign 06E026000
CERTAIN PRO-A MOTORS CORNER LAMPS, TURN SIGNALS, AND HEADLIGHTS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
2003 · exterior lightingcampaign 06E026000
CERTAIN PRO-A MOTORS CORNER LAMPS, TURN SIGNALS, AND HEADLIGHTS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
2002 · exterior lightingcampaign 06E026000
CERTAIN PRO-A MOTORS CORNER LAMPS, TURN SIGNALS, AND HEADLIGHTS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
2002 · vehicle speed controlcampaign 07V336000
ON CERTAIN PICKUP TRUCKS, PASSENGER VEHICLES, SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES, AND MOTOR HOMES CHASSIS, THE SPEED CONTROL DEACTIVATION SWITCH MAY, UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS, LEAK INTERNALLY AND THEN OVERHEAT, SMOKE, OR BURN.
2002 · seats:front assembly:reclinercampaign 03V281000
ON CERTAIN SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH HIGH BACK SEATS, THE UPPER BOLT ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE HIGH BACK SEAT, THAT ATTACHES THE SEAT RECLINER MECHANISM TO THE SEAT BACK FRAME, COULD FRACTURE. IF THE BOLT FRACTURES AND DOES NOT JAM IN THE SEAT BACK FRAME, THE SEAT BACK MAY RECLINE UNTIL IT MAKES CONTACT WITH AN OBJECT BEHIND THE SEAT, SUCH AS THE SECOND ROW SEAT CUSHION.
2002 · tires:tread/beltcampaign 01X001000
THIS IS NOT A SAFETY RECALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SAFETY ACT. HOWEVER, IT IS DEEMED A SAFETY IMPROVEMENT CAMPAIGN BY THE AGENCY. EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION: FORD IS REPLACING ALL FIRESTONE WILDERNESS AT 15, 16, AND 17 INCH TIRES MOUNTED ON FORD TRUCKS AND SUVS. FORD REPORTS TREAD SEPARATION CAN OCCUR DUE TO A COMBINATION OF THE SENSITIVITY OF THE TIRE DESIGN TO STRESS, AGING, AND MANUFACTURING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PLANTS. FORD IS REPLACING THESE TIRES TO PREVENT POSSIBLE PREMATURE TIRE FAILURE. VEHICLE DESCRIPTION: THE VEHICLES LISTED BELOW MAY HAVE BEEN ORIGINALLY EQUIPPED WITH FIRESTONE WILDERNESS AT TIRES OR MAY HAVE HAD WILDERNESS AT TIRES INSTALLED DURING THE FIRESTONE RECALL LAUNCHED IN AUGUST 2000. CERTAIN 1991 THROUGHT 2002 FORD EXPLORER CERTAIN 2001 THROUGHT 2002 EXPLORER SPORT, AND SPORT TRAC CERTAIN 1997 THROUGH 2002 MERCURY MOUNTAINEER CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 2001 RANGER CERTAIN 1999 THROUGH 2001 EXPEDITION CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 1994, AND 1997 MODEL YEAR F-SERIES CERTAIN 1991 THROUGH 1994 BRONCO NOTE: BOTH ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT AND REPLACEMENT TIRES ARE AFFECTED.
Specifications
Not sold in North America: these versions are from other markets.
4.0 L V6
4.0L 6-cylinder · 210 hp · AWD · automatic
Built 2007–2010