Photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC)
Power
Top speed (170 km/h)
Combined, EPA 1994
What owners say
Our take, from owner reports
Sentiment is overwhelmingly negative, with the vehicle characterized as a cheap, unreliable, and unpleasant transportation appliance.
4 problems reported (1 very frequent, 1 recurrent, 2 isolated) · high confidence
Problems owners report
- Very frequentGeneral mechanical unreliability and poor quality
Described as "head case of problems," "absolute piece of shit," and associated with family histories of Ford product failures.
- RecurrentUnpleasant ownership experience
Cited as emotionally distressing ("made me cry every single time I had to drive it"), horrendous to drive, and a vehicle owners were desperate to replace.
- IsolatedEngine and starting problems
Specific reports include a 1989 model with a bad battery causing a no-start condition, and a 1994 V6 model with intermittent hard starting and stalling issues.
+ 1 more issueShow fewer
- IsolatedAssociation with widespread brand transmission failures
Owners from the era link Ford vehicles, including the Tempo, to automatic transmission failures in V6 models, citing a known lubrication design flaw that was never addressed via recall.
The version owners recommend
Insufficient owner data available. No specific trim, year, or configuration is recommended. One owner mentions a 1993 model with a 4-cylinder engine that ran "with no issues whatsoever," but this is an isolated positive data point against a backdrop of widespread criticism.
Competitors to consider
Owners compare it most often with the not in competitive comparisons.
Is the Tempo right for you?
Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.
Full owner reportHide full owner report
Overall sentiment
Sentiment is overwhelmingly negative, with the vehicle characterized as a cheap, unreliable, and unpleasant transportation appliance. Owner feedback consistently describes it as a vehicle of last resort, purchased solely for extreme budget constraints. Positive remarks are exceptionally rare and focus solely on the car's ability to provide basic, temporary transportation ("point A to point B"). The dominant narrative is one of disappointment, mechanical unreliability, and a lack of any redeeming qualities related to performance, comfort, or durability. Several owners express strong emotional dislike, with descriptions including "horrendous," "absolute piece of shit," and a source of distress.
Positioning vs competitors
Insufficient owner data available.
Recommended configurations
Insufficient owner data available.
General recommendations
Not recommended for any purpose other than an ultra-low-cost, temporary beater when no other options exist. Owners strongly advise against purchase if any alternative is available. The vehicle is characterized as a symbol of financial hardship and mechanical despair. Prospective buyers with a slightly higher budget are universally directed toward contemporary Japanese alternatives (Honda, Toyota) for reliability.
Remarks
The Ford Tempo is primarily discussed in historical context by owners recounting past vehicle histories. It serves as a common reference point for "worst car ever owned" or a marker of a difficult financial period. The criticism is broad and non-specific to any single model year or component, painting the entire model line as fundamentally flawed. The data is retrospective, based on memories of ownership from the 1990s and early 2000s. Analysis based on approximately 12 substantive owner mentions across multiple discussions.
Specifications
3.0 V6
3.0L 6-cylinder · 132 hp · FWD · manual
Built 1992–1995