Photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC)
Power
Top speed (230 km/h)
Combined, EPA 1987
What owners say
Our take, from owner reports
The sentiment is overwhelmingly negative, characterized by a strong consensus on extreme unreliability and poor build quality, particularly for early models.
5 problems reported (1 very frequent, 4 recurrent) · high confidence
Problems owners report
- Very frequentExtreme mechanical and electrical unreliability
Engines described as unable to "hold themselves together," frequent breakdowns, constant need for diagnosis and repair, parts scarcity.
- RecurrentPoor build quality
Cited as a rushed development leading to widespread defects, contributing to the brand's damaged reputation.
- RecurrentElectrical gremlins
Random failures, problematic fuses mentioned as a primary issue.
+ 2 more issuesShow fewer
- RecurrentEngine-specific failures in early models
Carbureted twin-turbo system cited as particularly problematic, with one specific report of piston/valve damage and cylinder moisture.
- RecurrentStranding owners
Multiple anecdotes of the car breaking down and leaving drivers on the side of the road.
The version owners recommend
Insufficient owner data available to declare a "best" version. However, a clear distinction is made between early and later models. The first models, particularly those without fuel injection, are singled out as "one of the most unreliable engines ever built." Later Biturbos are described as "decent if finicky," suggesting improved, though still problematic, reliability. The Zagato Spyder variant is mentioned as a particularly desirable body style.
Is the Biturbo right for you?
Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.
Full owner reportHide full owner report
Overall sentiment
The sentiment is overwhelmingly negative, characterized by a strong consensus on extreme unreliability and poor build quality, particularly for early models. The vehicle is described as "notoriously unreliable," "the worst piece of shit," and "the most unreliable car that Maserati has ever made." This reputation is so pervasive that it is cited as a primary reason for the long-term damage to Maserati's brand image. Despite this, there is a recurrent, almost begrudging, appreciation for its styling, historical significance as the first production twin-turbo car, and the emotional, irrational desire it can provoke. Owners describe it as "dead sexy garbage" and acknowledge that when it runs, it can be a "riot" to drive. The overall impression is of a deeply flawed, financially perilous ownership proposition that is nonetheless compelling to a specific type of enthusiast.
Positioning vs competitors
Insufficient owner data available.
Recommended configurations
Insufficient owner data available for specific configurations. General advice strongly discourages the Biturbo as a primary vehicle. It is repeatedly characterized as a second or third car, a project car, or an emotional purchase for those fully aware of the risks. One owner explicitly states it is "rather than daily" transportation.
General recommendations
NOT recommended as a first car, daily driver, or for anyone seeking reliable transportation. It is presented as a project for expert hobbyists who are prepared for constant maintenance, part sourcing difficulties, and high costs. Prospective buyers are advised to join dedicated Biturbo forums, consult with existing owners, and expect to become an expert in repairing the vehicle. The car is suggested only for those who value its unique history, styling, and driving character over practicality and financial prudence. Leasing is not an option for this vintage model; purchasing a cheap example is mentioned, with the caveat that initial low cost will be offset by repair expenses.
Remarks
The Maserati Biturbo's reputation is a dominant theme in owner discussions, to the extent that it is used as a benchmark for automotive failure. Its legacy is directly tied to Maserati's attempt to produce a lower-priced, higher-volume car in the 1980s, which backfired due to quality issues. The data contains anecdotes from original owners in the 1980s corroborating the reliability problems. Some owners report modifying their cars extensively with non-stock parts specifically to improve reliability, not just performance. While a few isolated comments mention trouble-free ownership, they are presented as exceptions that prove the rule. The analysis is based on historical owner experiences and long-term community consensus rather than contemporary new-vehicle reviews.
Specifications
2.0
184 hp
Built 1985–1987