Photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC)
Power
Combined, EPA 2015
Our take, from owner reports
Sentiment is generally positive, with owners appreciating the vehicle's unique combination of compact car dimensions, minivan utility, and driving dynamics.
6 problems reported (3 recurrent, 3 isolated) · medium confidence
Includes hard jolts into gear, delayed and harsh shifts from first to second when cold, and erratic downshifting. A specific case on a 2012 model with 30k miles involved a whining noise diagnosed as a transmission or Transmission Control Module (TCM) issue.
Noted as "a bit of a dog with a full load," though acceptable for non-performance-oriented driving. Fuel economy reported as accurate (25-30 MPG in mixed driving).
Front sway bar bushings and the lower-rear engine torque mount are noted as wearing out fairly quickly.
Reported on a 2010 1.8L petrol model, with idle RPM dropping until stall once coolant temperature exceeds approximately 70°C (158°F). Suspected causes include MAP sensor or fuel issues, not vacuum leaks.
On a 2012 model, characterized by a vibration/pulsing under the brake pedal and metallic grunting noise when slowing on rough surfaces. Initially diagnosed as warped rotors, but problem returned. Not consistently reproducible.
Specifically criticized on a 2013 model.
Insufficient data to identify a specific model year or trim as the definitive "best version." Feedback spans multiple years of the second generation (2012-2015).
Is the 5 right for you?
Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.
Sentiment is generally positive, with owners appreciating the vehicle's unique combination of compact car dimensions, minivan utility, and driving dynamics. It is frequently described as a practical, fuel-efficient, and surprisingly fun-to-drive "mini-minivan" or "grown-up hatchback." The consensus highlights its excellent visibility, comfortable seating for four, and ability to transport large items. Criticisms are focused on specific mechanical issues, underwhelming power with a full load, and some interior material shortcomings. The vehicle is seen as a clever, niche alternative to larger SUVs and minivans for small families.
Insufficient comparative data from owner discussions.
Manual transmission is mentioned favorably by an owner of a 2009 model, who reported no issues on a long trip and satisfactory fuel economy (25-30 MPG). An owner of a 2013 model recommends replacing the stock radio/audio system due to poor quality. Aftermarket suspension upgrades, such as H&R springs with KYB GR2 shocks and a Mazdaspeed3 rear sway bar, are reported to improve handling without significant drawbacks.
Suitable for small families (e.g., with two children) seeking maximum utility in a compact, car-like package. Recommended for urban environments and drivers who prioritize maneuverability and parking ease over maximum passenger or cargo space. Not recommended for those regularly requiring power for highway merging with a full load. A pre-purchase inspection is advised, with specific attention to the automatic transmission, engine mounts, and front sway bar bushings. Consider aftermarket audio and suspension upgrades to enhance the ownership experience.
The provided data covers the second-generation Mazda 5 (2006-2015), with most detailed ownership experiences referencing model years 2009-2013. The platform shares significant components with the Mazda 3, which is noted as a source for some interchangeable performance parts. The 2.5L engine in later models is not specifically discussed; one data point references a 1.8L petrol engine available in other markets. The automatic transmission issues and specific wear items represent the most consistent technical concerns. Analysis is based on a limited number of substantive owner discussions, resulting in several areas with insufficient data.
2.5
2.5L 4-cylinder · 157 hp · FWD · automatic
Built 2011–2017