Photo: IFCAR / Public domain / Wikimedia Commons
Every generation
Power
Combined, EPA 2026
What owners say
Our take, from owner reports
Sentiment is sharply divided by generation and model type.
7 problems reported (2 recurrent, 5 isolated) · medium confidence
Problems owners report
- RecurrentPerceived dangerously slow acceleration / sluggish throttle response
Frequently cited, especially in reviews and for FWD models.
- RecurrentCVT transmission reliability concerns
Shared concern with other Mitsubishi/Nissan models, with a noted class action lawsuit regarding premature failure.
- IsolatedExcessive turbo lag
Noted as a significant drawback affecting drivability.
+ 4 more issuesShow fewer
- IsolatedUncomfortable seats
Mentioned as a negative point.
- IsolatedPoor rear visibility
Due to rear window design.
- IsolatedEngine entering "limp mode" unpredictably
Stranding owner.
- IsolatedChronic overheating in traffic
Related to cooling system failure.
The version owners recommend
1995-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse GSX: This turbocharged, all-wheel-drive version is consistently highlighted as the peak of the Eclipse lineage. It is celebrated for its potent performance, tunability, and iconic status within the enthusiast community. For the Eclipse Cross, a specific "best version" is not clearly identified in the available data, though one owner notes better responsiveness from the 2.0L AWD model with Eco Mode disabled compared to FWD versions.
Competitors to consider
Owners compare it most often with the Honda Prelude, Ford Probe, Mazda MX-6, Volkswagen Corrado and Subaru WRX STi.
Is the Eclipse right for you?
Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.
Full owner reportHide full owner report
Overall sentiment
Sentiment is sharply divided by generation and model type. Feedback on the classic sport coupe models (primarily 2nd generation, 1995-1999) is overwhelmingly positive from enthusiasts, praising its turbocharged performance, all-wheel-drive capability, and tuner-friendly nature. In stark contrast, the modern Eclipse Cross SUV (2018+) receives mixed to negative sentiment, widely criticized for the controversial reuse of the Eclipse name on a crossover, perceived sluggish performance, and underwhelming driving dynamics. Long-term owner reports on the 3rd and 4th generation coupes (2000-2012) are sparse but indicate a niche appreciation for their reliability as comfortable daily drivers, though they are acknowledged as significant performance downgrades from the revered 2nd generation.
Positioning vs competitors
The classic Eclipse (GSX) is positioned as a legendary tuner and rally-inspired sports coupe, frequently compared favorably to contemporary Japanese competitors like the Honda Prelude and Toyota Supra of its era for its forced induction and AWD system. The modern Eclipse Cross is positioned as a budget-conscious compact crossover, competing with mainstream offerings like the Hyundai Kona and Mazda CX-30 but often criticized for lacking the power, refinement, or driving engagement of those rivals. It is also directly compared to its corporate sibling, the Mitsubishi Outlander, with the Outlander generally seen as the more practical and family-oriented choice.
Recommended configurations
For classic coupes: The GSX trim with turbocharged engine and all-wheel-drive is strongly recommended for performance. For the Eclipse Cross: The AWD system is noted for competent performance in snow, ice, and wet conditions. One owner recommends disabling Eco Mode for improved throttle response. There is an isolated mention of a specific manufacturing strategy in some markets (Brazil) where a new, lower-priced version was created to compete on price.
General recommendations
The classic Eclipse GSX is recommended for enthusiasts seeking a tuner-friendly, performance-oriented coupe with historical significance. The Eclipse Cross may be suitable for budget-focused buyers prioritizing warranty coverage (10-year/100,000-mile in some markets) and all-weather capability over driving excitement or premium features. It is explicitly not recommended for buyers expecting a sporty driving experience commensurate with the Eclipse name. For any Eclipse Cross purchase, a thorough test drive focusing on acceleration and throttle response is advised to assess personal tolerance for its performance characteristics.
Remarks
The Mitsubishi Eclipse represents two distinct vehicle lineages: a celebrated sports coupe and a contemporary crossover. The overwhelming majority of critical discussion centers on the controversial branding decision to apply the Eclipse name to an SUV, which is a persistent point of contention in owner discussions. Data on long-term ownership experience for the Eclipse Cross is limited, with most mentions being comparative or purchase advice rather than detailed long-term reports. The positive reputation of the 1990s GSX model remains robust and separate from the modern vehicle sharing its name. Analysis based on approximately 35 substantive owner discussions and mentions across multiple generations.
Generation by generation
Owner insights per generation and US complaint/recall records (NHTSA).
Complaints and recalls by model yearWorst year: 2001. Years to avoid: 2003, 2001, 2000Source: NHTSA (US)Show table
Each year graded against the model's other years: Year Score. See all Mitsubishi Eclipse years to avoid
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Most-reported area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1 | 0 | air bags |
| 2010 | 1 | 0 | service brakes |
| 2009 | 42 | 1 | service brakes |
| 2008 | 71 | 1 | service brakes |
| 2007 | 107 | 4 | service brakes |
| 2006 | 99 | 4 | service brakes |
| 2005 | 6 | 4 | electrical system |
| 2004 | 14 | 5 | structure |
| 2003 | 166 | 5 | structure |
| 2002 | 104 | 4 | wheels |
| 2001 | 316 | 10 | wheels |
| 2000 | 314 | 10 | wheels |
| 1999 | 138 | 11 | power train |
| 1998 | 161 | 13 | power train |
Complaint counts come from owner reports filed with the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Higher-selling years naturally accumulate more complaints.
Recall notices95 on record · Source: NHTSA (US)Show recalls
2009 · service brakes, hydraulic:antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip:control unit/modulecampaign 15V337000
Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. (MMNA) is recalling certain model year 2006-2009 Eclipse vehicles manufactured April 20, 2005, to February 13, 2009, and 2007-2009 Eclipse Spyder vehicles manufactured December 23, 2005, to February 13, 2009. Due to corrosion inside the antil-lock brake system (ABS) unit, one or more of the internal valves may seize. In a braking event that uses the ABS, a seized valve would increase brake pedal travel and reduce braking ability.
2008 · service brakes, hydraulic:antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip:control unit/modulecampaign 15V337000
Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. (MMNA) is recalling certain model year 2006-2009 Eclipse vehicles manufactured April 20, 2005, to February 13, 2009, and 2007-2009 Eclipse Spyder vehicles manufactured December 23, 2005, to February 13, 2009. Due to corrosion inside the antil-lock brake system (ABS) unit, one or more of the internal valves may seize. In a braking event that uses the ABS, a seized valve would increase brake pedal travel and reduce braking ability.
2007 · service brakes, hydraulic:antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip:control unit/modulecampaign 15V337000
Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. (MMNA) is recalling certain model year 2006-2009 Eclipse vehicles manufactured April 20, 2005, to February 13, 2009, and 2007-2009 Eclipse Spyder vehicles manufactured December 23, 2005, to February 13, 2009. Due to corrosion inside the antil-lock brake system (ABS) unit, one or more of the internal valves may seize. In a braking event that uses the ABS, a seized valve would increase brake pedal travel and reduce braking ability.
2007 · fuel system, gasoline:storage:tank assemblycampaign 08V454000
MITSUBISHI IS RECALLING 45,988 MY 2005-2007 ENDEAVOR, GALANT, ECLIPSE COUPE, AND MY 2007 ECLIPSE SPYDER VEHICLES. THE BRACKET THAT IS THE ATTACHMENT POINT FOR THE LEFT REAR FUEL TANK MOUNTING STRAP MAY HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY FORMED DURING A METAL STAMPING PROCESS. THE PROCESS MAY HAVE CAUSED THE METAL TO HAVE A SPLIT IN THE AREA WHERE THE BOLT THAT HOLDS ONE OF THE TWO FUEL TANK STRAPS TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE VEHICLE IS LOCATED. IN THE EVENT THE FUEL TANK IS FULL AND THE VEHICLE IS SUBJECT TO A SEVERE COLLISION, THE BRACKET MAY BREAK AND ALLOW THE FUEL TANK TO DROP DOWN, POSSIBLY CAUSING A FUEL LEAK.
2007 · structure:frame and memberscampaign 06V334000
ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES, THE METAL FORMING PART OF THE FRONT CROSSMEMBER MAY HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY STAMPED RESULTING IN THE METAL BECOMING THINNER IN THE CROSS-SECTION THAN SPECIFIED. THIS COULD, OVER TIME, RESULT IN BREAKAGE OF THE CROSSMEMBER.
2007 · power train:automatic transmissioncampaign 06V414000
ON CERTAIN VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSIONS, THE KEY LOCK CABLE WAS IMPROPERLY MANUFACTURED AND MAY NOT ALLOW THE CABLE END TO LOCK INTO THE FLOOR SHIFTER MECHANISM. THIS CAN RESULT IN THE INTERLOCK SYSTEM TO BECOME INOPERATIVE AND ALLOW THE IGNITION KEY TO BE REMOVED WITHOUT THE GEARSHIFT MECHANISM BEING PLACED IN THE PARK POSITION.
2006 · service brakes, hydrauliccampaign 05V247000
CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES MAY HAVE BEEN FITTED WITH A DEFECTIVE BRAKE BOOSTER ASSEMBLY.
2006 · service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components:master cylindercampaign 05V299000
ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES, ONE OF FOUR SEALS INSIDE THE MASTER CYLINDER MAY HAVE BEEN INSTALLED IMPROPERLY. AS A RESULT, THE MASTER CYLINDER MAY UNEXPECTEDLY BY-PASS HYDRAULIC BRAKING FORCE PRESSURE AND ALLOW A LONGER THAN NORMAL PEDAL STROKE.
2006 · service brakes, hydraulic:antilock/traction control/electronic limited slip:control unit/modulecampaign 15V337000
Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. (MMNA) is recalling certain model year 2006-2009 Eclipse vehicles manufactured April 20, 2005, to February 13, 2009, and 2007-2009 Eclipse Spyder vehicles manufactured December 23, 2005, to February 13, 2009. Due to corrosion inside the antil-lock brake system (ABS) unit, one or more of the internal valves may seize. In a braking event that uses the ABS, a seized valve would increase brake pedal travel and reduce braking ability.
2006 · fuel system, gasoline:storage:tank assemblycampaign 08V454000
MITSUBISHI IS RECALLING 45,988 MY 2005-2007 ENDEAVOR, GALANT, ECLIPSE COUPE, AND MY 2007 ECLIPSE SPYDER VEHICLES. THE BRACKET THAT IS THE ATTACHMENT POINT FOR THE LEFT REAR FUEL TANK MOUNTING STRAP MAY HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY FORMED DURING A METAL STAMPING PROCESS. THE PROCESS MAY HAVE CAUSED THE METAL TO HAVE A SPLIT IN THE AREA WHERE THE BOLT THAT HOLDS ONE OF THE TWO FUEL TANK STRAPS TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE VEHICLE IS LOCATED. IN THE EVENT THE FUEL TANK IS FULL AND THE VEHICLE IS SUBJECT TO A SEVERE COLLISION, THE BRACKET MAY BREAK AND ALLOW THE FUEL TANK TO DROP DOWN, POSSIBLY CAUSING A FUEL LEAK.
2005 · equipment:other:labelscampaign 04V428000
CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 208, 'OCCUPANT CRASH PROTECTION.' THE BILINGUAL ENGLISH/SPANISH REMOVABLE AIR BAG WARNING LABELS AFFIXED TO THE DASH AND TO THE SUNVISOR DO NOT MEET THE SIZE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STANDARD.
2005 · air bags:frontal:passenger side:inflator modulecampaign 15V338000
Mitsubishi Motors North America, Inc. (MMNA) is recalling certain model year 2000-2005 Eclipse vehicles manufactured April 5, 1999, to December 17, 2004, 2001-2005 Eclipse Spyder vehicles manufactured January 19, 2000, to March 18, 2005, 2001-2005 Chrysler Sebring vehicles manufactured April 17, 2000, to February 21, 2005, and 2001-2005 Dodge Stratus vehicles manufactured April 17, 2000, to February 22, 2005. In the affected vehicles, the passenger side sun visor may be folded down in such a position that, if the passenger frontal air bag deploys, the passenger side sun visor may detach.
2005 · fuel system, gasoline:storage:tank assemblycampaign 08V454000
MITSUBISHI IS RECALLING 45,988 MY 2005-2007 ENDEAVOR, GALANT, ECLIPSE COUPE, AND MY 2007 ECLIPSE SPYDER VEHICLES. THE BRACKET THAT IS THE ATTACHMENT POINT FOR THE LEFT REAR FUEL TANK MOUNTING STRAP MAY HAVE BEEN IMPROPERLY FORMED DURING A METAL STAMPING PROCESS. THE PROCESS MAY HAVE CAUSED THE METAL TO HAVE A SPLIT IN THE AREA WHERE THE BOLT THAT HOLDS ONE OF THE TWO FUEL TANK STRAPS TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE VEHICLE IS LOCATED. IN THE EVENT THE FUEL TANK IS FULL AND THE VEHICLE IS SUBJECT TO A SEVERE COLLISION, THE BRACKET MAY BREAK AND ALLOW THE FUEL TANK TO DROP DOWN, POSSIBLY CAUSING A FUEL LEAK.
2005 · exterior lightingcampaign 06E026000
CERTAIN PRO-A MOTORS CORNER LAMPS, TURN SIGNALS, AND HEADLIGHTS SOLD AS REPLACEMENT LAMPS FOR USE ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. SOME COMBINATION LAMPS THAT ARE NOT EQUIPPED WITH AMBER SIDE REFLECTORS FAIL TO CONFORM TO FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 108, LAMPS, REFLECTIVE DEVICES, AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT.
2004 · fuel system, gasoline:delivery:fuel pumpcampaign 03V442000
ON CERTAIN PASSENGER VEHICLES, THE FUEL RETURN LINE HOSE FITTING ON THE ELECTRIC FUEL PUMP MAY BE RESTRICTED, CAUSING EXCESSIVE FUEL PRESSURE TO BUILD UP IN THE FUEL INJECTION SYSTEM. EXCESSIVE FUEL PRESSURE MAY RESULT IN A LEAK IN THE FUEL RETURN HOSE.
80 older recalls not shown. Check nhtsa.gov with your VIN for the full history.
Specifications
Enthusiast code: 4G
GT 3.8L V6 MIVEC
3.8L 6-cylinder · 265 hp · FWD · automatic
Built 2009–2011