Photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC)
Power
0–62 mph (0–100 km/h)
Top speed (220 km/h)
Combined, EPA 1988
What owners say
Our take, from owner reports
Sentiment is mixed and heavily dependent on the specific model year and powertrain.
7 problems reported (2 very frequent, 4 recurrent, 1 isolated) · high confidence
Problems owners report
- Very frequentSeverely underpowered engine (early 2.0L NA)
Described as anemic, lackluster, a "dog," with approximately 95-110 hp.
- Very frequentBosch CIS (K-Jetronic) fuel injection problems
System is hugely sensitive to air leaks, prone to failure if neglected or from old fuel, difficult to diagnose and repair without specialized knowledge.
- RecurrentElectrical issues
Dirty spade connectors, failing relays, brittle steering column switches, and faulty ignition switches causing no-start or running issues.
+ 4 more issuesShow fewer
- RecurrentParts availability and cost
Many parts are becoming scarce and expensive, with some specific components (e.g., early engine mounts) no longer available new.
- RecurrentGeneral reliability and need for constant maintenance
Described as a "red-headed bitch," requiring non-stop work to keep operational, not suitable for reliable daily use.
- RecurrentRust
Noted as a concern, particularly if the car has not been garage-kept.
- IsolatedBrake system (early models)
Use of rear drum brakes is criticized as outdated for a sports car.
The version owners recommend
The 924S is consistently highlighted as the best version for ownership. It combines the lighter, narrower body of the 924 with the more powerful and reliable Porsche-designed 2.5L engine from the 944, addressing the primary criticism of the original car. The 924 Turbo is also noted as a significant performance upgrade over the base model. The original 2.0L NA models, especially early examples with around 95-110 hp, are broadly advised against due to their severe lack of power and complex Bosch CIS fuel injection system.
Competitors to consider
Owners compare it most often with the Porsche 944, Porsche 928, Porsche 911, Porsche Boxster and DeLorean DMC-12.
Is the 924 right for you?
Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.
Full owner reportHide full owner report
Overall sentiment
Sentiment is mixed and heavily dependent on the specific model year and powertrain. The original 2.0L naturally aspirated models (1976-1982) are widely criticized for being "woefully underpowered," "pretty terrible," and "a joke," with performance described as lackluster and the engine considered anemic. These models are frequently derided as "not a real Porsche" due to their Volkswagen/Audi origins, shared components, and underwhelming driving experience. However, later models, particularly the 924S (which uses the 944's Porsche engine) and the 924 Turbo, receive more favorable commentary for their improved performance. The chassis and handling are consistently praised across all variants, with descriptions like "handling is quite literally out of this world." The car is generally seen as a complex, aging project vehicle that requires significant owner involvement, patience, and mechanical aptitude, rather than a turn-key classic.
Positioning vs competitors
Positioned as the budget, entry-level, and often disparaged predecessor to the more respected Porsche 944. It is considered inferior to the 944 in nearly every performance metric, especially power and styling, though noted to be slightly lighter. Compared to the contemporary DeLorean DMC-12, the base 924 is noted for matching its poor performance at a fraction of the cost. It is frequently mentioned alongside the 928 as part of Porsche's attempted move away from the 911 in the late 1970s and early 1980s. In the modern classic car market, it is discussed as a cheaper, more complicated, and less reliable alternative to a Mazda MX-5 or early Porsche Boxster for a fun, lightweight sports car.
Recommended configurations
A 924S model for its Porsche engine and improved reliability. A car with extensive service history and evidence of being driven/maintained, not left sitting. A garage-kept, lower-mileage example is strongly preferred. Avoid cars described as "ran when parked." For a project, ensure you have a reliable daily driver and a separate garage space. Plan to learn the intricacies of the Bosch CIS (K-Jetronic) fuel injection system or budget for a conversion to aftermarket EFI or carburetors. Verify parts availability for specific model years before purchase (e.g., early model engine mounts are noted as no longer available new).
General recommendations
Not recommended as a first car, only car, or daily driver due to high maintenance demands, part scarcity, and unpredictable reliability. Suitable only as a second/project car for an enthusiast with mechanical skills, patience, a well-equipped workspace, and a reliable primary vehicle. Potential buyers must be prepared for constant troubleshooting, expensive and hard-to-find parts, and the likelihood of never recouping financial investment. A thorough pre-purchase inspection focusing on rust, electrical connections, and fuel system health is critical. Ownership is recommended for those passionate about the model's specific character and history, not for those seeking simple, affordable performance.
Remarks
Owner feedback is deeply bifurcated by generation. The original 924 (1976-1982) is historically panned and considered a commercial and critical failure, saved only by its handling. The 924S (1984-1988) is viewed as a competent and redeemed variant. The car's reputation for poor reliability is exacerbated by long periods of inactivity; these cars deteriorate significantly when not driven regularly. The community emphasizes that repair costs can quickly exceed the car's market value, making it a labor of love rather than a sound financial investment. Analysis based on approximately 40 substantive owner discussions and historical comparisons.
Specifications
2.5 S
2.5L 4-cylinder · 160 hp · RWD · manual
Built 1987–1988