CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
Brands/Volvo/240
Volvo 240

Photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC)

Volvo

Volvo 240

Station wagon · Diesel · 23 versions · owner report

CompareFind my car

Every generation

Should I buy a 1979–1993 240?
Should I buy a 1978–1993 240?
155Hp

Power

20–21mpg

Combined, EPA 1993

What owners say

Our take, from owner reports

Overwhelmingly positive sentiment among long-term owners and enthusiasts, characterized by deep affection for the vehicle's character, durability, and simplicity.

7 problems reported (3 very frequent, 4 recurrent) · high confidence

Problems owners report

  • Very frequentRust, particularly on pre-1988 models

    Forms on rocker panels, wheel wells, and around the rear window seal; the single most critical factor in evaluating a vehicle.

  • Very frequentAging wiring and electrical gremlins

    Problematic engine/ignition harness in 1987 and earlier models; various electrical failures (odometer, gauges, relays, horn) due to age.

  • Very frequentContinuous minor mechanical issues

    Expected as part of owning a 30-40 year old car; includes exhaust leaks, injector leaks, brake component leaks, accessory failures (glove box lock), loose belts, and failing rubber bushings.

+ 4 more issuesShow fewer
  • RecurrentLack of power

    The 114 hp B230F engine is described as "very slow"; adequate for daily use but a noted weakness, especially compared to turbocharged Volvos or competitors.

  • RecurrentSpecific common failure points

    Odometer gear, overdrive solenoid (on manual transmissions), flame trap, suspension bushings, water pump.

  • RecurrentPoor fuel economy

    Noted as a downside, especially when running air conditioning.

  • RecurrentReported lack of rust protection on early models

    Specifically cited as a reason to seek 1988+ vehicles.

The version owners recommend

1988-1993 models ("Series IV"). These later years are specifically recommended for their galvanized bodies offering superior rust resistance, revised styling with plastic rear window surrounds, and the availability of dual airbags (1990+). The 1993 model, being the final year, is often highlighted. There is a noted caution against 1987 and earlier models due to a problematic engine wiring harness that deteriorates with age and requires replacement.

Competitors to consider

Owners compare it most often with the Mercedes-Benz W123/W124, BMW E30/E28/E34, Ford Crown Victoria, Honda Accord (early 1990s) and Volvo 740/940/850.

Is the 240 right for you?

Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.

Ask about your car →
Full owner reportHide full owner report

Overall sentiment

Overwhelmingly positive sentiment among long-term owners and enthusiasts, characterized by deep affection for the vehicle's character, durability, and simplicity. The model is consistently praised for its legendary reliability, particularly of the B230 "Redblock" 4-cylinder engine, which is reported to routinely exceed 300,000 miles with basic maintenance. Owners express strong emotional attachment to its iconic "brick" design, straightforward mechanical nature, and tank-like build quality, often describing it as a beloved project or hobby vehicle. However, a very strong consensus emphasizes that these are now 30-40 year old vehicles, and ownership is defined by a continuous cycle of minor repairs and maintenance. They are not recommended as a sole, reliable daily driver without significant owner involvement, backup transportation, or a high tolerance for inconvenience. The vehicle is universally acknowledged as underpowered and crude by modern standards, but this is accepted as part of its enduring charm.

Positioning vs competitors

Positioned as a durable, simple, and safe rear-wheel-drive European sedan/wagon, but consistently described as less refined and less performance-oriented than contemporary German rivals. Compared to a Mercedes W124, the Volvo is noted as equally comfortable but with a less pleasant driving experience, especially in automatic 6-cylinder comparisons. Versus BMWs (E30, E34), the 240 is acknowledged to have inferior handling, a less satisfying manual gearbox, and significantly less available power. Compared to a domestic alternative like the Ford Crown Victoria, the 240 wagon offers superior cargo utility but with much higher mileage and age for similar money. Within the Volvo lineage, the 240 is seen as the most basic and iconic "brick," with later 700/900 series and 850 models offering more modern features, better rust protection, and improved performance (especially turbo variants) while maintaining similar durability.

Recommended configurations

Wagon body style for maximum utility. Manual transmission (M46/M47) is preferred by enthusiasts, though noted as rare. Seek models with factory air conditioning, especially in warmer climates. A plastic engine splash panel is recommended to protect the engine and improve fuel economy. For those seeking more power, a 940 Turbo is suggested as a more modern alternative with a similar character.

General recommendations

Only recommended for owners who are willing and able to perform their own maintenance and repairs. Ownership requires easy access to online parts suppliers (IPD, FCP Euro, RockAuto) as local part availability is largely gone, leading to shipping delays. A pre-purchase inspection by a knowledgeable mechanic is essential, with a critical focus on rust (sills, jacking points, floor, wheel wells) and the condition of the wiring harness in pre-1988 models. It is strongly advised to have a backup vehicle. Not suitable as a sole daily driver for those dependent on shop repairs or who require modern reliability and convenience. An excellent platform for learning basic automotive repair.

Remarks

The Volvo 240's reputation for legendary reliability refers to its mechanical robustness when new and its simple, repairable design. At 30-50 years old, "reliability" is redefined as "fixability," with an expectation of ongoing small repairs. The community support is exceptionally strong, with extensive online resources (forums, YouTube, dedicated parts suppliers) cited as essential for ownership. The vehicle's value proposition is entirely dependent on its condition and the owner's mechanical aptitude; a cheap purchase price can quickly be eclipsed by repair costs if work is farmed out to shops. Analysis based on approximately 30 substantive owner discussions spanning purchase advice, long-term ownership experiences, and comparative assessments.

Specifications

Enthusiast code: P245

2.4 Diesel

82 hp

Built 1979–1993

Power82 Hp
AspirationNaturally aspirated engine
Seats5 seats
Fuel typeDiesel
Body typeStation wagon

Explore this car

Analyze this car
  • Find an upgrade
  • Compare with another car
  • Not sure? Answer 5 quick questions

Quick facts

Brand
Volvo
Versions catalogued
23
Body types
Station wagon, Sedan
Owner report
Available

Compare with

  • 240 vs Ford Crown Victoria

CarWizz

Car picks from owner reports, US listing prices and EPA data.

BrandsBest carsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&AYear ScoreStudiesQuizAbout
PrivacyTermsCookiesLegal notice

© 2026 CarWizz