The short answer
Based on available data, the Acura NSX comes out ahead of the Mazda RX-7 on power. Check the specs table and owner sentiment below for the full comparison before deciding between the two. Both are covered by real owner reports on CarWizz.
Overall
Overwhelmingly positive sentiment approaching legendary reverence for first-generation model, widely regarded as revolutionary supercar redefining exotic car reliability, usability, and everyday drivability. Praised extensively for exceptional Honda build quality enabling routine 200,000-300,000+ mile operation without major mechanical failures, precise handling dynamics teaching Ferrari and Porsche lessons in chassis balance, comfortable ergonomics allowing daily driving unlike temperamental Italian competitors, and timeless aluminum body construction preventing rust. The naturally-aspirated 3.0L V6 producing 270-274 hp delivers linear, predictable power delivery with intoxicating VTEC engagement at 5,800 RPM and 8,000 RPM redline.
Best version to buy
3.0L Manual Transmission (1991-1997, pre-facelift) The 1991-1997 pre-facelift models with 5-speed manual transmission represent purest NSX expression - lightweight aluminum construction (approximately 3,000 lbs / 1,361 kg), naturally-aspirated 3.0L C30A V6 producing 270-274 hp, fixed headlights (1991-1993 pop-ups add 60 lbs / 27 kg), manual steering maintaining ultimate feedback. The 1995+ NSX-T targa variant adds removable roof panel but 100+ lbs (45+ kg) weight penalty and reduced chassis rigidity.
Known issues
Overall
The sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, characterized by deep enthusiast admiration for the vehicle's unique character, timeless design, and engaging driving dynamics. The RX-7 is consistently described as a "dream car," a "joyous" driver's car that feels like an extension of the driver, and a vehicle that garners significant positive attention. However, this adoration is heavily tempered by a universal and very frequent consensus on the demanding, expensive, and specialized ownership experience.
Best version to buy
Consensus varies by generation and intended use. For simplicity, robustness, and longevity, the naturally aspirated (NA) second-generation (FC) is frequently cited as the most reliable and sensible choice, with its non-turbo 13B engine praised for durability.
Known issues
The verdict
The Acura NSX is the better choice for most buyers.
It has more power on its best-equipped version than the Mazda RX-7, based on the data above. If efficiency matters more to you than outright power, the Mazda RX-7 is worth a closer look instead.
Other comparisons
Not sure which one fits you?
Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.
Which is more reliable, the Acura NSX or the Mazda RX-7?
Owner reports show similar reliability sentiment for the Acura NSX and the Mazda RX-7. Check the known issues listed above for specific differences between the two.
Which is better for families, the Acura NSX or the Mazda RX-7?
The Mazda RX-7 seats more passengers than the Acura NSX on its catalogued best-equipped version. Body type also differs: the Acura NSX is classed as a Coupe, the Mazda RX-7 as a Coupe.
Which has better fuel economy, the Acura NSX or the Mazda RX-7?
Fuel consumption data is limited for one or both models. Check the specs table above for the figures available on each catalogued version.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Acura NSX or the Mazda RX-7?
Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but owner reports mention cost-related concerns more often for the Mazda RX-7 than the Acura NSX. See the known issues comparison above.