Brands/Ford/Compare
Ford EcoSport
Ford

Ford

EcoSport

Owner report available

Nissan Juke
Nissan

Nissan

Juke

Owner report available

Ford EcoSport vs Nissan Juke

Updated June 2026

The short answer

Based on available data, the Nissan Juke comes out ahead of the Ford EcoSport on power. Check the specs table and owner sentiment below for the full comparison before deciding between the two. Both are covered by real owner reports on CarWizz.

Specs side by side

Specification
EcoSport
Juke
Typical price (used, US)
$9,900–$13,240
N/A
Power
166 Hp
218 Hpbetter
Torque
150 lb-ft (203 Nm)
207 lb-ft (280 Nm)better
0–62 mph (0–100 km/h)
N/A
7s
Top speed
N/A
137 mph (220 km/h)
Fuel (maker's test)
N/A
33 mpg (7.2 L/100 km)
Drive
All wheel drive
Front wheel drive
Transmission
6 gears, automatic
6 gears, manual
Engine
2 L
1.6 L
Seats
5
5
Body type
SUV
SUV

What owners say

EcoSport

Overall

Overwhelmingly negative sentiment with a strong consensus on poor reliability, particularly for models equipped with the 1.0L 3-cylinder EcoBoost engine. Owner feedback is dominated by reports of catastrophic engine failures, transmission problems, and significant post-repair complications. The vehicle is described as having "0 redeeming qualities" and is frequently labeled as "straight up junk." A minority of owners with the 2.0L 4-cylinder engine report more tolerable experiences, describing the vehicle as a basic, functional appliance that is "not great either." Positive remarks are extremely rare and isolated, typically focusing on initial purchase price, seating position, or storage flexibility, but these are heavily overshadowed by pervasive mechanical failure narratives.

Best version to buy

The 2.0L 4-cylinder engine variant (often in 4x4/AWD configuration) is the only version with any marginally positive feedback. Owners of this powertrain acknowledge its shortcomings but consider it a more reliable alternative to the problematic 1.0L EcoBoost.

Known issues

  • Catastrophic 1.0L EcoBoost engine failure due to oil pump drive belt tensioner failure: leads to complete loss of oil pressure and engine destruction, subject to a major recall. Very frequent.
  • Transmission failure: includes complete transmission replacement on automatic models, with reports of failures around 101,000 km (63,000 miles). Codes such as P0700 (TCM) cited. Recurrent.
  • Poor post-repair quality: after engine replacements, owners report issues like engines not bolted down properly, subsequent exhaust leaks, turbo problems, and sensor failures. Recurrent.

Juke

Overall

Mixed to negative sentiment overall, with a clear generational divide. The first-generation Juke (approximately 2010-2019) is widely criticized for severe and frequent CVT transmission failures, poor interior space, and questionable long-term reliability, leading to strong warnings against purchase. A subset of owners of turbocharged and NISMO variants report enjoying the vehicle's unique personality and adequate power when the powertrain functions correctly.

Best version to buy

Insufficient owner data available to declare a consensus "best version." For the first generation, the NISMO RS AWD model with its "beefier CVT" is noted by one owner as being surprisingly robust even when modified, but this is an isolated data point. For the second generation, no specific trim or powertrain receives consistent praise.

Known issues

  • CVT transmission failure (First Generation): Complete failure, causing limp mode, power loss, and stranding; described as notorious and expected after approximately 150,000 km. Frequency: very frequent.
  • General poor reliability (First Generation): Multiple system failures including infotainment (radio, navigation, touchscreen), power windows, push-button start, exhaust, and oil consumption/burning smells as mileage increases (~130,000 mil…
  • Underpowered engine (Second Generation 1.0L DIG-T): Described as gutless, woefully underpowered, and sounding strained; struggles with acceleration. Frequency: recurrent.

The verdict

The Nissan Juke is the better choice for most buyers.

It has more power on its best-equipped version than the Ford EcoSport, based on the data above. If efficiency matters more to you than outright power, the Ford EcoSport is worth a closer look instead.

Not sure which one fits you?

Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.

Take the quiz

Frequently asked questions

Which is more reliable, the Ford EcoSport or the Nissan Juke?

Owner reports show similar reliability sentiment for the Ford EcoSport and the Nissan Juke. Check the known issues listed above for specific differences between the two.

Which is better for families, the Ford EcoSport or the Nissan Juke?

Data on family-specific factors like cargo space is limited for one or both models, but based on available reports, both are positioned as practical daily drivers. Check the specs table above for seating and body type.

Which has better fuel economy, the Ford EcoSport or the Nissan Juke?

The EPA rates the 2022 Ford EcoSport at 25 mpg combined and the 2017 Nissan Juke at 26–29 mpg, depending on the version.

Which is cheaper to maintain, the Ford EcoSport or the Nissan Juke?

Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but owner reports mention cost-related concerns more often for the Ford EcoSport than the Nissan Juke. See the known issues comparison above.