Photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC)
Power
0–62 mph (0–100 km/h)
Top speed (220 km/h)
Combined, EPA 2017
What owners say
Our take, from owner reports
Mixed to negative sentiment overall, with a clear generational divide.
10 problems reported (2 very frequent, 5 recurrent, 3 isolated) · high confidence
Problems owners report
- Very frequentCVT transmission failure (First Generation)
Complete failure, causing limp mode, power loss, and stranding; described as notorious and expected after approximately 150,000 km.
- Very frequentPoor interior space and practicality
Cramped rear seats, tiny trunk, difficult to fit child seats; characterized as deceptively small inside relative to exterior size.
- RecurrentGeneral poor reliability (First Generation)
Multiple system failures including infotainment (radio, navigation, touchscreen), power windows, push-button start, exhaust, and oil consumption/burning smells as mileage increases (~130,000 miles/210,000 km).
+ 7 more issuesShow fewer
- RecurrentUnderpowered engine (Second Generation 1.0L DIG-T)
Described as gutless, woefully underpowered, and sounding strained; struggles with acceleration.
- RecurrentDCT transmission quality (Second Generation)
Criticized as one of the worst gearboxes experienced; imprecise and unpleasant.
- RecurrentUncomfortable driving position
Lack of lumbar support and offset pedals (in LHD models) cause back and hip pain on long journeys.
- RecurrentHigh real-world fuel consumption
Reports of poor fuel economy, especially in urban driving (e.g., ~10 km/L or ~24 MPG), falling short of expectations for its size.
- IsolatedExcessive wind noise
Noticeable at highway speeds above 60 mph (97 km/h).
- IsolatedFirm ride quality
Suspension described as hard, transmitting road bumps noticeably.
- IsolatedSteering/suspension component wear
Mentioned as a common cause for inspection failure in some markets.
The version owners recommend
Insufficient owner data available to declare a consensus "best version." For the first generation, the NISMO RS AWD model with its "beefier CVT" is noted by one owner as being surprisingly robust even when modified, but this is an isolated data point. For the second generation, no specific trim or powertrain receives consistent praise.
Competitors to consider
Owners compare it most often with the Kia XCeed, Toyota Yaris Cross, Ford Puma, Peugeot 2008 and Renault Captur.
Is the Juke right for you?
Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.
Full owner reportHide full owner report
Overall sentiment
Mixed to negative sentiment overall, with a clear generational divide. The first-generation Juke (approximately 2010-2019) is widely criticized for severe and frequent CVT transmission failures, poor interior space, and questionable long-term reliability, leading to strong warnings against purchase. A subset of owners of turbocharged and NISMO variants report enjoying the vehicle's unique personality and adequate power when the powertrain functions correctly. The second-generation model (approximately 2019 onward) receives somewhat less severe criticism but is frequently described as underpowered, with a poor-quality DCT transmission, high fuel consumption for its class, and an uncomfortable driving position on long journeys. Across both generations, the vehicle's distinctive styling is polarizing, appreciated by some for its character but derided by others. The consensus indicates the Juke is a compromised choice, often recommended only to those specifically drawn to its design who are willing to accept significant trade-offs in practicality, reliability, and driving dynamics.
Positioning vs competitors
Generally positioned as a less practical, less reliable, and often less fuel-efficient option within the small SUV/crossover segment. Compared to the Toyota Yaris Cross, it is viewed as having inferior fuel efficiency and resale value. Against the Kia XCeed, it is noted for a smaller, less usable trunk and harder suspension, while lacking Kia's long warranty. It is frequently described as offering more exterior style but less interior space than most rivals, being "bigger on the outside than it is on the inside." The Nissan Qashqai is consistently mentioned as the more sensible, spacious, and family-friendly alternative from the same brand. The vehicle is often characterized as a "style-over-substance" choice within its competitive set.
Recommended configurations
Manual transmission is suggested over the DCT (for second generation) due to severe criticism of the automatic's quality. AWD is noted as a desirable feature for poor weather, with one owner appreciating a switch to toggle it for fuel economy. For first-generation models, an extended warranty is strongly implied due to CVT reliability concerns. No other configuration recommendations are consistently mentioned.
General recommendations
Not recommended as a primary family vehicle due to cramped rear seats and small trunk, making child seat installation difficult. Not recommended for buyers prioritizing reliability, practicality, or fuel economy. Potentially suitable only for buyers who are strongly attracted to its unconventional styling and accept the associated compromises. For first-generation models, a thorough pre-purchase inspection with a specific focus on CVT health is critical, and budgeting for a potential transmission replacement is advised. Leasing a new model is suggested over buying to avoid long-term reliability concerns. Buyers are urged to test-drive competitors like the Toyota Yaris Cross, Kia XCeed, or Mazda CX-5 for comparison.
Remarks
The pervasive criticism of the first-generation Juke's CVT reliability dominates owner feedback and severely impacts the model's overall reputation. This has led to a broad community warning against purchasing used examples. The second-generation model appears to have moved away from the problematic CVT but has introduced a poorly regarded DCT and an underpowered base engine, shifting rather than resolving fundamental drivetrain criticisms. The vehicle's polarizing design ensures it retains a niche appeal, but owner experiences strongly suggest it is a high-compromise choice. Analysis based on approximately 50 substantive owner discussions spanning over a decade.
Generation by generation
Owner insights per generation and US complaint/recall records (NHTSA).
Complaints and recalls by model yearWorst year: 2011. Years to avoid: 2011Source: NHTSA (US)Show table
Each year graded against the model's other years: Year Score. See all Nissan Juke years to avoid
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Most-reported area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 14 | 1 | engine |
| 2016 | 28 | 1 | power train |
| 2015 | 34 | 1 | engine |
| 2014 | 59 | 2 | engine |
| 2013 | 103 | 2 | engine |
| 2012 | 87 | 4 | engine |
| 2011 | 153 | 3 | engine |
Complaint counts come from owner reports filed with the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Higher-selling years naturally accumulate more complaints.
Recall notices14 on record · Source: NHTSA (US)Show recalls
2017 · service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components:master cylindercampaign 18V086000
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2015-2017 Nissan Juke Nismo RS vehicles. Due to a problem within the brake master cylinder, brake fluid may leak into the brake booster, reducing brake performance.
2016 · service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components:master cylindercampaign 18V086000
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2015-2017 Nissan Juke Nismo RS vehicles. Due to a problem within the brake master cylinder, brake fluid may leak into the brake booster, reducing brake performance.
2015 · service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components:master cylindercampaign 18V086000
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2015-2017 Nissan Juke Nismo RS vehicles. Due to a problem within the brake master cylinder, brake fluid may leak into the brake booster, reducing brake performance.
2014 · electrical system:ignition:switchcampaign 15V418000
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2014 Versa Sedan vehicles manufactured July 16, 2013, to January 29, 2014, 2013-2014 Cube vehicles manufactured July 3, 2013, to October 21, 2013, and 2013-2014 Juke vehicles manufactured July 3, 2013, to October 22, 2013. When exposed to hot temperatures, the affected vehicles have an engine start/stop button that may stick inside the button housing.
2014 · fuel system, gasolinecampaign 14V683000
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2012-2014 Nissan Juke, 2012-2013 Infiniti M56, QX56, and 2014-2015 Infiniti Q70 (V8 engine vehicles only), and QX80 vehicles. The fuel pressure sensors may not have been sufficiently tightened during production. As a result, the fuel pressure sensor may loosen with vehicle usage and cause a fuel leak.
2013 · electrical system:ignition:switchcampaign 15V418000
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2014 Versa Sedan vehicles manufactured July 16, 2013, to January 29, 2014, 2013-2014 Cube vehicles manufactured July 3, 2013, to October 21, 2013, and 2013-2014 Juke vehicles manufactured July 3, 2013, to October 22, 2013. When exposed to hot temperatures, the affected vehicles have an engine start/stop button that may stick inside the button housing.
2013 · fuel system, gasolinecampaign 14V683000
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2012-2014 Nissan Juke, 2012-2013 Infiniti M56, QX56, and 2014-2015 Infiniti Q70 (V8 engine vehicles only), and QX80 vehicles. The fuel pressure sensors may not have been sufficiently tightened during production. As a result, the fuel pressure sensor may loosen with vehicle usage and cause a fuel leak.
2012 · fuel system, gasolinecampaign 18V156000
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2011-2012 Nissan Juke vehicles previously remedied under recall 12V-069. During that recall remedy, the fuel pressure sensor may not have been properly tightened, potentially causing the sensor to loosen and leak fuel.
2012 · seatscampaign 12V328000
NISSAN IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2012 JUKE VEHICLES MANUFACTURED FROM FEBRUARY 3, 2012, THROUGH MAY 26, 2012. DUE TO AN INCOMPLETE WELD PENETRATION, THE REAR SEAT BACK STRIKER MAY PARTIALLY SEPARATE IN A CRASH.
2012 · fuel system, gasolinecampaign 14V683000
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain model year 2012-2014 Nissan Juke, 2012-2013 Infiniti M56, QX56, and 2014-2015 Infiniti Q70 (V8 engine vehicles only), and QX80 vehicles. The fuel pressure sensors may not have been sufficiently tightened during production. As a result, the fuel pressure sensor may loosen with vehicle usage and cause a fuel leak.
2012 · fuel system, gasolinecampaign 12V069000
NISSAN IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011-2012 JUKE, INFINITI QX AND INFINITI M VEHICLES. THE FUEL PRESSURE SENSORS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN TIGHTENED TO THE CORRECT SPECIFICATION. AS A RESULT, THE FUEL PRESSURE SENSOR MAY LOOSEN DUE TO HEAT AND VIBRATION CAUSING FUEL TO LEAK.
2011 · fuel system, gasolinecampaign 18V156000
Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2011-2012 Nissan Juke vehicles previously remedied under recall 12V-069. During that recall remedy, the fuel pressure sensor may not have been properly tightened, potentially causing the sensor to loosen and leak fuel.
2011 · engine and engine cooling:engine:gasoline:turbo/superchargercampaign 11V583000
NISSAN IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011 NISSAN JUKE VEHICLES MANUFACTURED FROM APRIL 9, 2010, THROUGH MAY 12, 2011. THE TURBOCHARGER BOOST SENSOR BRACKET MAY SEPARATE FROM THE AIR INLET TUBE DUE TO A DEFECTIVE WELD.
2011 · fuel system, gasolinecampaign 12V069000
NISSAN IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011-2012 JUKE, INFINITI QX AND INFINITI M VEHICLES. THE FUEL PRESSURE SENSORS MAY NOT HAVE BEEN TIGHTENED TO THE CORRECT SPECIFICATION. AS A RESULT, THE FUEL PRESSURE SENSOR MAY LOOSEN DUE TO HEAT AND VIBRATION CAUSING FUEL TO LEAK.
Specifications
Nismo RS 1.6 DIG-T
1.6L 4-cylinder · 218 hp · FWD · manual
Built 2015–2019