Honda
Fit
Kia
Soul
Honda Fit vs Kia Soul: 2022 Comparison
Specs side by side
What owners say
Fit
Overall
Overwhelmingly positive sentiment centered on exceptional practicality, reliability, and low cost of ownership. The vehicle is consistently praised for its "magic seat" interior configuration, offering surprising cargo space and passenger room that rivals larger vehicles, all within a compact, easy-to-park footprint. Owners report high satisfaction with fuel economy (real-world reports of 36 MPG highway), simple and inexpensive maintenance, and a fun, tossable driving character, particularly with the manual transmission.
Best version to buy
Second Generation (late model, ~2009-2014): Specifically cited for its traditional Multi-Point Injection (MPI) engine and conventional automatic transmission ("Hondamatic"), which owners associate with extreme long-term reliability and simpler, cheaper maintenance. This generation is highlighted as having a drivetrain capable of lasting "half a million miles." The manual transmission variant (6-speed) is highly recommended across all generations for driving enjoyment and perceived durability.
Known issues
- ⚠CVT transmission concerns: Potential long-term reliability questions, especially if fluid service intervals are neglected; some reports of a "weird" feel compared to conventional automatics. Frequency: recurrent.
- ⚠Direct Injection (GDI) engine carbon buildup: Mentioned as a known issue for third-generation (2015+) models with Gasoline Direct Injection, requiring potential cleaning. Frequency: isolated.
- ⚠Firm/uncomfortable ride quality: Noted as harsh over bumps and potholes, with inadequate damping. Frequency: recurrent.
Soul
Overall
Mixed to negative sentiment, heavily dependent on model year and engine. The vehicle is consistently praised for its practicality, including exceptional interior roominess, good fuel economy, easy maneuverability, and overall value as a basic, economical transportation appliance. Long-term owners of specific years (e.g., 2011, 2020) report high satisfaction with minimal repairs and reliable service.
Best version to buy
Insufficient owner data available to designate a single "best" version. Positive long-term reliability is anecdotally reported for the 2011 model year and for the 2020+ models with the 2.0L engine (non-turbo), provided they avoid the major engine failure issues.
Known issues
- ⚠Catastrophic engine failure (knocking, stalling, seizure) often preceded by excessive oil consumption: very frequent across 2010-2020 models. Linked to recalls and extended warranty programs.
- ⚠Excessive oil consumption/burning: recurrent, noted as a common precursor to major engine issues.
- ⚠Transmission problems: includes laggy acceleration, harsh clunking between gears (particularly 2nd to 3rd), "searching" for gears, and general lack of refinement. Frequency: recurrent.
Explore further
Not sure which one fits you?
Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more reliable, the Honda Fit or the Kia Soul?
Owner reports show similar reliability sentiment for the Honda Fit and the Kia Soul. Check the known issues listed above for specific differences between the two.
Which is better for families, the Honda Fit or the Kia Soul?
Data on family-specific factors like cargo space is limited for one or both models, but based on available reports, both are positioned as practical daily drivers. Check the specs table above for seating and body type.
Which has better fuel economy, the Honda Fit or the Kia Soul?
Fuel consumption data is limited for one or both models. Check the specs table above for the figures available on each catalogued version.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Honda Fit or the Kia Soul?
Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but owner reports mention cost-related concerns more often for the Kia Soul than the Honda Fit. See the known issues comparison above.