Lamborghini
Countach
Owner report available
Porsche
959
Owner report available
Lamborghini Countach vs Porsche 959
The short answer
Based on available data, the Lamborghini Countach comes out ahead of the Porsche 959 on power. Check the specs table and owner sentiment below for the full comparison before deciding between the two. Both are covered by real owner reports on CarWizz.
Specs side by side
What owners say
Countach
Overall
Sentiment is overwhelmingly positive and reverential, focused on the vehicle's iconic design, cultural status, and investment potential. The classic Countach (circa 1970s-1990s) is universally celebrated as a defining supercar of its era, a "poster car" and childhood dream for many. Its sharp, aggressive, and "wonky but right" design is considered a masterpiece of retro-futurism.
Best version to buy
Insufficient owner data available to declare a consensus "best" version. The 25th Anniversary model (1988-1990) is mentioned as a successful redesign that improved sales.
Known issues
- **Classic Models:** Extreme driver discomfort: seats described as a "vice" that crushes the pelvis, leading to leg numbness; cabin is very hot; poor visibility. Frequency: recurrent.
- Difficult driving dynamics: described as clumsy, ungainly, temperamental, and difficult to see out of. Frequency: recurrent.
- Poor build quality: noted as "terrible" in its build quality and driving comfort; assembly techniques described as questionable. Frequency: recurrent.
959
Overall
Overwhelmingly positive sentiment characterized by deep admiration and reverence. The vehicle is consistently described as a legendary, groundbreaking supercar that was technologically advanced for its era, packing more innovations and experimental engineering than any other road car available at the time. It is held in extremely high regard for its historical significance, iconic design that has aged well, and its role as a technical benchmark.
Best version to buy
Insufficient owner data available to determine a consensus on a "best" version among standard production models. The 'Komfort' trim is specifically identified and appreciated.
Known issues
- Frightening running and maintenance costs: extreme expense associated with upkeep and repairs, contributing to its status as a rarely driven collector item. Frequency: recurrent.
- Extreme rarity and garage queen status: very few produced, making ownership and sightings exceptionally uncommon. Frequency: very frequent.
- Technological complexity: described as packed with borderline experimental engineering for its time, which may imply complexity for servicing, though this is framed as a positive attribute of its innovation. Frequency: isolated.
The verdict
The Lamborghini Countach is the better choice for most buyers.
It has more power on its best-equipped version than the Porsche 959, based on the data above. If efficiency matters more to you than outright power, the Porsche 959 is worth a closer look instead.
Explore further
Not sure which one fits you?
Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more reliable, the Lamborghini Countach or the Porsche 959?
Owner reports show similar reliability sentiment for the Lamborghini Countach and the Porsche 959. Check the known issues listed above for specific differences between the two.
Which is better for families, the Lamborghini Countach or the Porsche 959?
The Porsche 959 seats more passengers than the Lamborghini Countach on its catalogued best-equipped version. Body type also differs: the Lamborghini Countach is classed as a Coupe, the Porsche 959 as a Coupe.
Which has better fuel economy, the Lamborghini Countach or the Porsche 959?
Fuel consumption data is limited for one or both models. Check the specs table above for the figures available on each catalogued version.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Lamborghini Countach or the Porsche 959?
Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but reliability signals above are the closest proxy: fewer reported issues generally means lower repair costs over time.