CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
Brands/Chevrolet/Uplander
Chevrolet Uplander

Photo: Wikimedia Commons (CC)

Chevrolet

Chevrolet Uplander

Minivan · Gas · 3 versions · owner report

CompareFind my car
243Hp

Power

109mph

Top speed (175 km/h)

19mpg

Combined, EPA 2008

Typical asking price (US)$4,294–$8,888median $6,257 · 35 live listings · 2005–2008

What owners say

Our take, from owner reports

Owner sentiment is overwhelmingly negative, with the vehicle characterized as unreliable, poorly built, and a source of persistent mechanical and electrical problems.

7 problems reported (2 very frequent, 3 recurrent, 2 isolated) · high confidence

Problems owners report

  • Very frequentAutomatic transmission failure

    Complete loss of forward gears, slipping between 1st and 2nd gear, broken 1-2 band, solenoid failures, requiring rebuilds or replacements. Described as the "weak spot.".

  • Very frequentChronic electrical problems

    Erratic behavior including door indicator lights staying on, stability control randomly engaging, dashboard warning lights illuminating simultaneously, key stuck in ignition, horn honking when attempting to crank, window regulator/motor malfunctions, and general "possessed" computer behavior.

  • RecurrentCooling system and thermostat failures

    Repeated thermostat failures (P0128 code), engines overheating, heaters blowing cold at idle, and difficulty bleeding air from the system.

+ 4 more issuesShow fewer
  • RecurrentAutomatic sliding door malfunctions

    Doors binding, failing to operate correctly, described as a "known issue" with no manufacturer-provided solution.

  • RecurrentEngine running issues

    Rough idle when hot, stalling when shifting into reverse, hard starting requiring throttle input, and injector circuit codes (P0201-P0206).

  • IsolatedAll-Wheel Drive (AWD) and ABS system failures

    AWD and ABS being disabled with multiple wheel speed sensor codes (C0035, C0040, C0050, C0281), rendering the vehicle dangerously poor in snow.

  • IsolatedStructural and body issues

    Rust (specifically "Wisconsin rust"), moisture intrusion into driver's side footwell causing damp carpet, and thin/weak body construction.

The version owners recommend

Insufficient owner data available. No specific trim or model year is recommended as superior. One owner of a 2007 model with 260,000 miles reported it had "been good to me," but this is an isolated positive report against widespread criticism.

Competitors to consider

Owners compare it most often with the Honda Odyssey, Toyota Sienna, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chevrolet Venture and Buick Terraza.

Is the Uplander right for you?

Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.

Ask about your car →
Full owner reportHide full owner report

Overall sentiment

Owner sentiment is overwhelmingly negative, with the vehicle characterized as unreliable, poorly built, and a source of persistent mechanical and electrical problems. Long-term owner reports frequently cite catastrophic transmission failures, chronic electrical gremlins, and a general lack of durability. The vehicle is described as a "nightmare" and that it "fucking suck[s]" by multiple owners. A very small number of isolated reports mention satisfaction with a specific, well-maintained example, describing it as an "excellent vehicle" or one that "runs well," but these are exceptions against a dominant backdrop of frustration. The consensus is that the Uplander is a vehicle best avoided unless acquired for a very low price with full awareness of its significant and recurring failure points.

Positioning vs competitors

Positioned as an inferior alternative to contemporary minivans. It is consistently described as having worse build quality and reliability than the Honda Odyssey and Toyota Sienna, though it may be priced lower on the used market. Compared to other GM minivans of the era (Venture, Montana, Terraza, Relay), it is seen as part of the same problematic platform. Some owner feedback suggests it is less reliable than certain years of the Dodge Grand Caravan, with the 2011-2012 Grand Caravan specifically mentioned as a potentially better, newer alternative for a similar price. It is generally viewed as a budget option that carries high risk of expensive repairs.

Recommended configurations

Insufficient owner data available. No specific configurations are recommended. One comment suggests that parts commonality with other GM products (Cadillac SRX for front brakes, Chevrolet Venture for second-row seats) can be an advantage for repairs and modifications, but this is not a purchase recommendation.

General recommendations

NOT recommended for purchase due to widespread and severe reliability concerns. If considering purchase, only pursue exceptionally clean, low-mileage, and meticulously documented examples from a single owner, with a full service history, preferably from a dealership. A pre-purchase inspection by a mechanic familiar with GM vehicles is absolutely essential. Buyers should budget for immediate and ongoing repairs, particularly for the transmission and electrical systems. It may only be suitable for a dedicated DIY mechanic who understands the platform's flaws and has access to parts. For the average buyer seeking a used minivan, community feedback strongly advises looking at Honda Odyssey (avoiding specific years with known transmission issues), Toyota Sienna, or a 2011-2012 Dodge Grand Caravan instead.

Remarks

The Uplander is part of the GM U-body platform shared with the Chevrolet Venture, Buick Terraza, Pontiac Montana, and Saturn Relay, which explains the commonality of parts and problems. Owner discussions indicate that dealerships and mechanics were often unable to resolve known issues like the sliding door problems due to a lack of support or solutions from the manufacturer. While parts are generally available due to this platform sharing, the vehicle's reputation for neglect and abuse on the used market means finding a well-maintained example is exceptionally rare. The feedback is based on long-term ownership experiences with high-mileage vehicles, often detailing multiple major failures over 150,000+ miles. Analysis based on approximately 35 substantive owner discussions and related comments.

Generation by generation

Owner insights per generation and US complaint/recall records (NHTSA).

Complaints and recalls by model yearNo year grades F. Best year: 2007Source: NHTSA (US)Show table

Each year graded against the model's other years: Year Score.

YearComplaintsRecallsMost-reported area
20081191electrical system
20071092structure
20061584electrical system
20051964electrical system

Complaint counts come from owner reports filed with the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Higher-selling years naturally accumulate more complaints.

Recall notices11 on record · Source: NHTSA (US)Show recalls

2008 · suspension:rearcampaign 10V110000

THE BRAUN CORPORATION HAS NOTIFIED NHTSA ABOUT A DEFECT IN CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2008 GENERAL MOTORS MOBILITY CONVERSION, HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE LOW FLOOR MINIVANS. DURING CONVERSION, THE DRIVER OR PASSENGER SIDE TRAILING ARM MODIFICATION MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY WELDED.

2007 · steeringcampaign 09E005000

DORMAN IS RECALLING 979 STEERING KNUCKLES, DORMAN P/NOS. 697-902 AND 697-903, SOLD UNDER DORMAN'S "OE SOLUTIONS<SUP>TM</SUP>" BRAND NAME, AND NAPA P/NOS. 7-8502 AND 7-8503 WHICH WERE SOLD FOR REPLACEMENT USE ON THE VARIOUS VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. A POTENTIAL MATERIAL OR DESIGN DEFECT COULD RESULT IN THE STEERING KNUCKLE BREAKING IN THE HUB AREA.

2007 · suspension:rearcampaign 10V110000

THE BRAUN CORPORATION HAS NOTIFIED NHTSA ABOUT A DEFECT IN CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2008 GENERAL MOTORS MOBILITY CONVERSION, HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE LOW FLOOR MINIVANS. DURING CONVERSION, THE DRIVER OR PASSENGER SIDE TRAILING ARM MODIFICATION MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY WELDED.

2006 · steeringcampaign 09E005000

DORMAN IS RECALLING 979 STEERING KNUCKLES, DORMAN P/NOS. 697-902 AND 697-903, SOLD UNDER DORMAN'S "OE SOLUTIONS<SUP>TM</SUP>" BRAND NAME, AND NAPA P/NOS. 7-8502 AND 7-8503 WHICH WERE SOLD FOR REPLACEMENT USE ON THE VARIOUS VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. A POTENTIAL MATERIAL OR DESIGN DEFECT COULD RESULT IN THE STEERING KNUCKLE BREAKING IN THE HUB AREA.

2006 · equipment:other:labelscampaign 06V051000

CERTAIN CARGO VANS FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARDS NO. 110, "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS" AND NO. 120. "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS FOR MOTOR VEHICLES OTHER THAN PASSENGER CARS." THESE CARGO VANS WERE SHIPPED WITHOUT A TIRE AND LOADING INFORMATION LABELS BECAUSE THEY WERE INCORRECTLY DESIGNATED AS INCOMPLETE VEHICLES.

2006 · suspension:rearcampaign 10V110000

THE BRAUN CORPORATION HAS NOTIFIED NHTSA ABOUT A DEFECT IN CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2008 GENERAL MOTORS MOBILITY CONVERSION, HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE LOW FLOOR MINIVANS. DURING CONVERSION, THE DRIVER OR PASSENGER SIDE TRAILING ARM MODIFICATION MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY WELDED.

2006 · equipment:other:labelscampaign 05V552000

CERTAIN TRUCKS AND SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 110, "TIRE SELECTION AND RIMS." THESE VEHICLES WERE SHIPPED WITH TIRE AND LOADING INFORMATION LABELS LISTING AN INACCCURATE VEHICLE CAPACITY WEIGHT.

2005 · steeringcampaign 09E005000

DORMAN IS RECALLING 979 STEERING KNUCKLES, DORMAN P/NOS. 697-902 AND 697-903, SOLD UNDER DORMAN'S "OE SOLUTIONS<SUP>TM</SUP>" BRAND NAME, AND NAPA P/NOS. 7-8502 AND 7-8503 WHICH WERE SOLD FOR REPLACEMENT USE ON THE VARIOUS VEHICLES LISTED ABOVE. A POTENTIAL MATERIAL OR DESIGN DEFECT COULD RESULT IN THE STEERING KNUCKLE BREAKING IN THE HUB AREA.

2005 · seats:mid/rear assemblycampaign 05V061000

ON CERTAIN MINIVANS, THE OUTBOARD RELEASE HANDLE ON THE IMPACT-SIDE SECOND-ROW BUCKET SEAT MAY BE ACTUATED AND THE REAR LATCHES MAY UNLATCH EARLY IN A SIDE IMPACT CRASH. THIS WAS DISCOVERED IN A SIDE IMPACT TEST RUN BY GM, UNDER CONDITIONS SIMILAR TO NHTSA'S NEW CAR ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (NCAP) SIDE IMPACT TEST.

2005 · suspension:rearcampaign 10V110000

THE BRAUN CORPORATION HAS NOTIFIED NHTSA ABOUT A DEFECT IN CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2005-2008 GENERAL MOTORS MOBILITY CONVERSION, HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE LOW FLOOR MINIVANS. DURING CONVERSION, THE DRIVER OR PASSENGER SIDE TRAILING ARM MODIFICATION MAY NOT HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY WELDED.

2005 · parking brakecampaign 05V287000

CERTAIN SPORT UTILITY VEHICLES FAIL TO CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE SAFETY STANDARD NO. 135, 'PASSENGER CAR BRAKE SYSTEMS.' TO MEET THE STANDARD, THE VEHICLE MUST NOT MOVE FOR FIVE MINUTES WHEN STOPPED ON A STEEP HILL WITH THE PARKING BRAKE APPLIED AND THE VEHICLE IN NEUTRAL (N). SOME OF THESE VEHICLES FAILED THIS TEST.

Specifications

3.9 i V6

3.9L 6-cylinder · 243 hp · FWD · automatic

Built 2006–2008

Power243 Hp
Torque245 lb-ft (332 Nm)
Top speed109 mph (175 km/h)
DriveFront wheel drive
Transmission4 gears, automatic transmission
Engine3.9 L
AspirationNaturally aspirated engine
Cylinders6
Seats7 seats
Fuel typeGas
Body typeMinivan

Explore this car

Analyze this car
  • Find an upgrade
  • Compare with another car
  • Not sure? Answer 5 quick questions

Quick facts

Brand
Chevrolet
Versions catalogued
3
Body types
Minivan
Owner report
Available

Compare with

  • Uplander vs Chevrolet Venture
  • Uplander vs Honda Odyssey
  • Uplander vs Toyota Sienna

CarWizz

Car picks from owner reports, US listing prices and EPA data.

BrandsBest carsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&AYear ScoreStudiesQuizAbout
PrivacyTermsCookiesLegal notice

© 2026 CarWizz