CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
Brands/Nissan/Leaf
Nissan Leaf

Photo: TTTNIS / CC0 / Wikimedia Commons

Nissan

Nissan Leaf

Coupe · Electric · 7 versions · owner report

Ranked #10 of 10 subcompact SUVs on owner data, price and fuel economy

CompareFind my car

Every generation

Should I buy a 2025–today Leaf?
Should I buy a 2017–2025 Leaf?
Should I buy a 2010–2017 Leaf?
218Hp

Power

99mph

Top speed (160 km/h)

103–121MPGe

Combined, EPA 2026

What owners say

Our take, from owner reports

Sentiment is sharply divided by generation and use case.

7 problems reported (3 very frequent, 3 recurrent, 1 isolated) · high confidence

Problems owners report

  • Very frequentSevere battery degradation and cold-weather performance loss (Gen1

    2011-2013): Rapid loss of battery capacity, "lizard" battery issues, catastrophic range loss in cold weather, leading to unusable vehicles.

  • Very frequentPassive battery thermal management

    Causes rapid state-of-charge (SOC) drop during highway driving in cold weather, battery isolation faults, swollen cells, and long-term health concerns. Cited as a fundamental design flaw.

  • Very frequentOutdated CHAdeMO fast-charging standard

    Limited and declining public charger availability, making road trips difficult and reducing long-term utility.

+ 4 more issuesShow fewer
  • RecurrentLoss of remote telematics services (Gen1)

    Nissan shutdown of servers for pre-2016 models, disabling remote battery status checks and cabin pre-conditioning.

  • RecurrentMinor electrical and build quality issues

    Passenger door lock actuator failures, weak 12V batteries, telemetry unit resets required, water pooling in strut towers causing corrosion.

  • RecurrentReduced real-world range in cold weather

    Significant efficiency drop, with reports of 3.5 miles/kWh in winter versus 4.2+ in warmer months.

  • IsolatedSubscription model for connected services

    Google Built-In and premium connectivity features on higher 2026 trims require a paid subscription after the first year ($16.99/month or $169.99/year).

The version owners recommend

For second-generation models (2018+), the high-spec Tekna (or SL trim in some markets) is recommended for its heated seats and steering wheel, leather, LED headlights, and better equipment, which enhance comfort, especially in winter. For first-generation models, no specific version is recommended; owners advise avoiding 2011-2013 models entirely. The "Plus" (62 kWh) battery models are noted for making the car more usable but do not resolve the core thermal management and charging standard limitations.

Competitors to consider

Owners compare it most often with the Tesla Model 3, Tesla Model Y, Chevrolet Bolt EV/EUV, Hyundai Ioniq 5 and Kia EV6.

Is the Leaf right for you?

Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.

Ask about your car →
Full owner reportHide full owner report

Overall sentiment

Sentiment is sharply divided by generation and use case. For the first-generation models (notably 2011-2013), feedback is overwhelmingly negative due to severe battery degradation, loss of remote access services, and poor cold-weather performance, leading to significant owner frustration and financial loss. Second-generation models (2018 onward) receive a more mixed to positive assessment, particularly as low-cost, reliable urban runabouts. These later models are praised for their simplicity, low maintenance costs, comfortable ride, and strong value proposition when purchased used at significant discounts. However, widespread and very frequent criticism is directed at the vehicle's passive battery thermal management system, which is linked to rapid state-of-charge loss in cold weather, battery isolation faults, and concerns about long-term health. The outdated CHAdeMO fast-charging standard is also a recurrent and significant drawback for long-distance travel. Owner satisfaction is highly dependent on obtaining the vehicle at a low price, having reliable home charging, and having realistic expectations for its role as a short-range commuter vehicle.

Positioning vs competitors

Positioned as a budget-friendly, no-frills entry into EV ownership, often compared to used mainstream hybrids (Prius) and low-cost used ICE vehicles on value. It is consistently seen as inferior to modern EV competitors (Tesla, Hyundai/Kia, GM) in terms of charging speed, range, battery technology, and long-distance capability due to CHAdeMO and lack of active thermal management. It is favorably compared to other cheap, short-range EVs (Fiat 500e, older Bolt) for local commuting reliability and lower maintenance, but unfavorably compared to them on battery durability (vs. Bolt) and charging network support. Considered a pragmatic, "appliance-like" choice for specific, limited use cases, not a technology leader.

Recommended configurations

Home charging capability (Level 1 or 2) is an absolute prerequisite. For colder climates, a trim with a heated steering wheel and seats (e.g., Tekna/SL) is strongly recommended to reduce cabin heating drain on the battery. For second-generation models, purchasing plastic strut tower covers to prevent water accumulation and corrosion is a common, low-cost recommendation. Using a wired connection for Apple CarPlay is noted. An extended warranty is suggested by some due to battery concerns. Avoid models with black exterior paint if concerned about visible scratches.

General recommendations

Suitable as a low-cost second car or primary vehicle for urban commuters with predictable, short daily drives (under 50-60 miles/80-100 km) and guaranteed home charging. Ideal for buyers seeking minimal maintenance and low operating costs. NOT recommended for drivers in very cold climates without garage charging, for those who require reliable long-distance travel, or for anyone dependent on public fast-charging networks. Essential to thoroughly check battery health (State of Health - SOH) via tools like LeafSpy prior to purchase, especially for first-generation models. Aggressively negotiate price on used models; transaction prices should reflect the vehicle's technological limitations. For second-generation models, verify that any software-related issues (e.g., telemetry/Nissan Connect) have been addressed.

Remarks

Owner feedback is highly generation-specific. The first-generation Leaf (particularly 2011-2013) is widely regarded as a flawed product with obsolete technology and severe durability issues, contributing to its rapid depreciation and presence on used lots. The second-generation Leaf (2018+) is viewed as a competent, if technologically dated, commuter vehicle. Its value is almost entirely driven by low acquisition cost. The lack of active battery cooling is the single most criticized technical aspect across all model years, creating a significant performance and reliability gap versus liquid-cooled competitors. The discussion indicates that for a subset of owners with aligned needs, the later Leaf provides satisfactory service, but it is not considered a future-proof or versatile EV. Analysis based on approximately 45 substantive owner discussions.

Generation by generation

Owner insights per generation and US complaint/recall records (NHTSA).

Complaints and recalls by model yearWorst year: 2022. Years to avoid: 2022, 2020, 2019Source: NHTSA (US)Show table

Each year graded against the model's other years: Year Score. See all Nissan Leaf years to avoid

YearComplaintsRecallsMost-reported area
202642electrical system
2025140electrical system
2024100unknown or other
2023213vehicle speed control
20221884electrical system
2021604electrical system
20203306electrical system
20193835electrical system
2018664service brakes
2017142air bags
2016364service brakes
20151104service brakes
2014346service brakes
2013815service brakes

Complaint counts come from owner reports filed with the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Higher-selling years naturally accumulate more complaints.

Recall notices49 on record · Source: NHTSA (US)Show recalls

2026 · electrical system:propulsion system:traction batterycampaign 26V188000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2026 LEAF vehicles. The high voltage battery may have internal damage that can cause a short circuit within the battery module.

2026 · seat belts:rear/other:retractorcampaign 26V425000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2026 LEAF vehicles. The outer rear seat belt automatic locking retractors (ALR) may deactivate early, which can prevent a child restraint system (CRS) from securing properly. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 208, "Occupant Crash Protection."

2023 · equipment:other:owners/service/other manualcampaign 23V048000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2018-2023 LEAF vehicles. The Owner's Manual instructions for defroster operation are incorrect, and may result in reduced defroster performance under specific conditions. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 103, "Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems."

2023 · service brakes, hydraulic:foundation components:hoses, lines/piping, and fittingscampaign 23V362000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2023 LEAF vehicles. The right-hand brake tubes may have been damaged during production and could corrode, possibly causing a hole in the brake line and a brake fluid leak.

2023 · vehicle speed controlcampaign 23V494000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2018-2023 LEAF vehicles. The vehicle may accelerate unintentionally if the driving mode is changed ("D" to "B"; e-Pedal "On"; or "ECO" mode) after disengaging the cruise control.

2022 · equipment:other:owners/service/other manualcampaign 23V048000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2018-2023 LEAF vehicles. The Owner's Manual instructions for defroster operation are incorrect, and may result in reduced defroster performance under specific conditions. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 103, "Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems."

2022 · vehicle speed controlcampaign 23V494000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2018-2023 LEAF vehicles. The vehicle may accelerate unintentionally if the driving mode is changed ("D" to "B"; e-Pedal "On"; or "ECO" mode) after disengaging the cruise control.

2022 · back over prevention: sensing system: cameracampaign 24V071000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2018-2022 LEAF vehicles. Damage to the camera harness can cause distortion or loss of the rearview camera display image. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 111, "Rear Visibility."

2022 · electrical system:propulsion system:traction batterycampaign 25V655000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2021-2022 LEAF vehicles equipped with a Level 3 quick charging port. The lithium-ion battery may overheat during Level 3 charging.

2021 · equipment:other:owners/service/other manualcampaign 23V048000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2018-2023 LEAF vehicles. The Owner's Manual instructions for defroster operation are incorrect, and may result in reduced defroster performance under specific conditions. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 103, "Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems."

2021 · vehicle speed controlcampaign 23V494000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2018-2023 LEAF vehicles. The vehicle may accelerate unintentionally if the driving mode is changed ("D" to "B"; e-Pedal "On"; or "ECO" mode) after disengaging the cruise control.

2021 · back over prevention: sensing system: cameracampaign 24V071000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2018-2022 LEAF vehicles. Damage to the camera harness can cause distortion or loss of the rearview camera display image. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 111, "Rear Visibility."

2021 · electrical system:propulsion system:traction batterycampaign 25V655000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2021-2022 LEAF vehicles equipped with a Level 3 quick charging port. The lithium-ion battery may overheat during Level 3 charging.

2020 · back over prevention: sensing system: cameracampaign 20V412000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2020 LEAF electric vehicles. Under certain circumstances, the images for the back-up camera can disappear while in reverse. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 111, "Rear Visibility."

2020 · visibility:glass, side/rearcampaign 20V570000

Nissan North America, Inc. (Nissan) is recalling certain 2020 Altima, Maxima and Leaf vehicles. The rear window glass may not remain properly secured to the vehicle.

34 older recalls not shown. Check nhtsa.gov with your VIN for the full history.

Specifications

Enthusiast code: ZE2

75 kWh

Electric · 218 hp · FWD · automatic

Built 2025–2026

Power218 Hp
Torque261 lb-ft (354 Nm)
Top speed99 mph (160 km/h)
DriveFront wheel drive
Transmission1 gears, automatic transmission
Seats5 seats
Fuel typeElectric
Body typeCoupe

Explore this car

Analyze this car
  • Find an upgrade
  • Compare with another car
  • Not sure? Answer 5 quick questions

Quick facts

Brand
Nissan
Versions catalogued
7
Body types
Coupe, Hatchback
Owner report
Available

Compare with

  • Leaf vs Chevrolet Bolt EUV
  • Leaf vs Tesla Model 3
  • Leaf vs Tesla Model Y
  • Leaf vs Ford Mustang Mach-E
  • Leaf vs Hyundai IONIQ 5

CarWizz

Car picks from owner reports, US listing prices and EPA data.

BrandsBest carsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&AYear ScoreStudiesQuizAbout
PrivacyTermsCookiesLegal notice

© 2026 CarWizz