Chrysler
200
Kia
Optima
Chrysler 200 vs Kia Optima: 2018 Comparison
The short answer
The Chrysler 200 offers power, while the Kia Optima excels at fuel economy instead. Choose the Chrysler 200 if you prioritize power in daily driving, or the Kia Optima if fuel economy matters more for your needs. Both are covered by real owner reports on CarWizz.
Specs side by side
What owners say
200
Overall
Overwhelmingly negative sentiment regarding long-term reliability, with a sharp divide between the first-generation (2011-2014) and second-generation (2015-2017) models. The first generation is widely characterized as a stopgap, "MEH" vehicle with dated design and unremarkable performance. The second generation receives some praise for its improved interior and exterior styling, and the top-trim V6 AWD configuration is noted as a solid, feature-rich value proposition when functional.
Best version to buy
2015-2017 models with the Pentastar V6 engine, all-wheel drive (AWD), and the higher "C" trim level (e.g., 200C). This configuration is specifically noted for using a more robust ZF automatic transmission (as opposed to the problematic unit in other trims) and providing solid performance.
Known issues
- ⚠Transmission failure: Complete failures requiring replacement, severe shifting lag, erratic gear hunting, "rubber band" effect, inability to hold speed.
- ⚠Electrical system failures: Parasitic battery drain, complete electrical system shutdowns, flickering lights, non-functional accessories, faulty wiring harnesses. Problems persist even after battery replacement. Frequency: very frequent.
- ⚠2.4L MultiAir engine problems: Oil consumption issues, failing MultiAir actuator blocks, potential for piston ring failure leading to oil leaking into cylinders, associated with a class action lawsuit. Frequency: very frequent.
Optima
Overall
Mixed sentiment with a strong generational divide. Long-term owners of earlier models (pre-2011) report exceptionally high reliability and satisfaction, with examples reaching over 270,000 miles with minimal maintenance beyond oil changes. For the 2011-2019 generation, sentiment is sharply split.
Best version to buy
Insufficient owner data available to declare a consensus "best" trim or powertrain. Feedback is contradictory: some owners strongly recommend the V6 engine (available in earlier models) for its bulletproof reliability compared to the problematic four-cylinders, while others praise the top-tier SXL Turbo trim for its features and driving experience despite the inherent engine risk.
Known issues
- ⚠Catastrophic engine failure (Theta II 2.4L/2.0T): Connecting rod bearing failure leading to seized engine, often around 100,000-150,000 miles; also severe oil consumption.
- ⚠Excessive oil consumption: Engine burns oil at a high rate, potentially leading to damage if not monitored closely. Frequency: recurrent.
- ⚠Engine replacement process hardships: Long repair times (weeks to months), difficulties with dealer service departments, out-of-pocket costs for rental cars and misdiagnoses despite warranty coverage. Frequency: recurrent.
The verdict
The Kia Optima is the better choice for most buyers.
It has better fuel economy on its best-equipped version than the Chrysler 200, based on the data above. If power matters more to you than running costs, the Chrysler 200 is worth a closer look instead.
Explore further
Not sure which one fits you?
Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more reliable, the Chrysler 200 or the Kia Optima?
Owner reports show similar reliability sentiment for the Chrysler 200 and the Kia Optima. Check the known issues listed above for specific differences between the two.
Which is better for families, the Chrysler 200 or the Kia Optima?
Data on family-specific factors like cargo space is limited for one or both models, but based on available reports, both are positioned as practical daily drivers. Check the specs table above for seating and body type.
Which has better fuel economy, the Chrysler 200 or the Kia Optima?
The Kia Optima is more fuel-efficient on paper: 9 L/100km combined versus 10.7 L/100km for the Chrysler 200, based on the best-equipped catalogued version of each.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Chrysler 200 or the Kia Optima?
Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but owner reports mention cost-related concerns more often for the Chrysler 200 than the Kia Optima. See the known issues comparison above.