The short answer
The Chrysler 200 offers fuel economy, while the Ford Fusion excels at power instead. Choose the Chrysler 200 if you prioritize fuel economy in daily driving, or the Ford Fusion if power matters more for your needs. Both are covered by real owner reports on CarWizz.
Overall
Overwhelmingly negative sentiment regarding long-term reliability, with a sharp divide between the first-generation (2011-2014) and second-generation (2015-2017) models. The first generation is widely characterized as a stopgap, "MEH" vehicle with dated design and unremarkable performance. The second generation receives some praise for its improved interior and exterior styling, and the top-trim V6 AWD configuration is noted as a solid, feature-rich value proposition when functional.
Best version to buy
2015-2017 models with the Pentastar V6 engine, all-wheel drive (AWD), and the higher "C" trim level (e.g., 200C). This configuration is specifically noted for using a more robust ZF automatic transmission (as opposed to the problematic unit in other trims) and providing solid performance.
Known issues
Overall
Sentiment is mixed and heavily dependent on the specific powertrain and generation. The Fusion is widely praised for its value proposition, offering a comfortable, quiet, and refined ride with a well-equipped interior at a price point often significantly lower than Japanese competitors like the Toyota Camry or Honda Accord. Long-term owner reports frequently highlight satisfaction with the vehicle's driving dynamics, comfort for long commutes, and overall build quality when purchased used at a good price.
Known issues
The verdict
The Chrysler 200 is the better choice for most buyers.
It has better fuel economy on its best-equipped version than the Ford Fusion, based on the data above. If power matters more to you than running costs, the Ford Fusion is worth a closer look instead.
Common problems by model year
Not sure which one fits you?
Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.
Owner reports show similar reliability sentiment for the Chrysler 200 and the Ford Fusion. Check the known issues listed above for specific differences between the two.
Data on family-specific factors like cargo space is limited for one or both models, but based on available reports, both are positioned as practical daily drivers. Check the specs table above for seating and body type.
The EPA rates the 2017 Chrysler 200 at 22–27 mpg combined and the 2020 Ford Fusion at 23–42 mpg, depending on the version.
Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but owner reports mention cost-related concerns more often for the Chrysler 200 than the Ford Fusion. See the known issues comparison above.