Brands/Ford/Compare
Ford Expedition
Ford

Ford

Expedition

Owner report
Infiniti QX56
Infiniti

Infiniti

QX56

Owner report

Ford Expedition vs Infiniti QX56: 2024 Comparison

Updated June 2026

The short answer

Based on available data, the Ford Expedition comes out ahead of the Infiniti QX56 on fuel economy and power. Check the specs table and owner sentiment below for the full comparison before deciding between the two. Both are covered by real owner reports on CarWizz.

Specs side by side

Specification
Expedition
QX56
Typical price (used, US)
$29,722–$73,294
$9,199–$11,195
Power
440 Hp
325 Hp
Torque
691 Nm
533 Nm
Acceleration
N/A
7.8s
Top speed
N/A
180 km/h
Fuel consumption
13.8 L/100km
15.3 L/100km
Drive
All wheel drive
All wheel drive
Transmission
10 gears, automatic
5 gears, automatic
Engine
3.5 L
5.6 L
Seats
8
N/A
Body type
SUV
SUV

What owners say

Expedition

Overall

Mixed sentiment with a clear generational divide. Long-term owners of older models, particularly those with the 5.4L Triton V8 (e.g., 2013 model), report very high reliability with only routine maintenance required, describing them as "rock solid" and "so reliable." However, sentiment shifts significantly for newer generations equipped with the 3.5L EcoBoost V6 and the Ford/GM co-developed 10-speed automatic transmission. These models are frequently criticized for severe and recurrent transmission failures ("jerk, clunk, bang"), cam phaser issues requiring engine work, and other premature mechanical failures.

Best version to buy

Insufficient owner data available to declare a consensus "best" model year or trim. Data suggests avoiding specific problematic years is more critical than seeking a particular trim.

Known issues

  • 10-speed automatic transmission failures: very frequent reports of harsh shifting, jerking, clunking, banging, complete loss of acceleration, and total transmission failure requiring replacement, sometimes multiple times under 100,000 mile…
  • Cam phaser failure: requires timing cover gasket replacement and phaser replacement; causes engine rattle on startup and performance loss. Frequency: recurrent.
  • Other EcoBoost engine issues: includes reports of excessive oil consumption (adding a quart monthly), coolant hose failures, and in one severe case, white smoke from exhaust with gasoline smell and loss of power. Frequency: recurrent.

QX56

Overall

Mixed sentiment with a clear generational divide. The first-generation QX56 (2004-2010) is generally viewed as a robust, reliable, and capable full-size SUV with a "bulletproof" V8 powertrain, offering significant value on the used market due to high depreciation. Long-term owner reports praise its durability, with multiple examples cited reaching 200,000 to 350,000 miles with basic maintenance.

Best version to buy

Insufficient owner data available to designate a specific model year or trim as "best." Feedback is primarily divided by generation, with implicit favor towards the 2005-2010 first-generation models for their perceived mechanical robustness and away from the 2011-2013 models due to the timing chain and catalytic converter issues. One owner noted the Infiniti could be had with load-leveling rear air suspension, but no trim level consensus exists.

Known issues

  • Premature catalytic converter failure: Very expensive repair ($1,700-$6,000 for parts), often occurs shortly after warranty expiration, can cause misfires and running rich. Frequency: very frequent.
  • Timing chain system failure: Causes loud whistling/whining noise, loss of power, can lead to catastrophic engine damage with metal in oil; repair costs extremely high ($4,000-$13,500). Frequency: very frequent.
  • Excessive fuel consumption: Real-world mileage reported as low as 11-12 MPG. Frequency: very frequent.

The verdict

The Infiniti QX56 is the better choice for most buyers.

It has stronger reliability sentiment in owner reports than the Ford Expedition, based on the data above. If the specific known issues on the Infiniti QX56 are a dealbreaker, the Ford Expedition is worth a closer look instead.

Not sure which one fits you?

Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.

Take the quiz

Frequently asked questions

Which is more reliable, the Ford Expedition or the Infiniti QX56?

Owner reports lean more positive on reliability for the Infiniti QX56 than the Ford Expedition. See the known issues comparison above for the specific concerns owners report on each.

Which is better for families, the Ford Expedition or the Infiniti QX56?

Data on family-specific factors like cargo space is limited for one or both models, but based on available reports, both are positioned as practical daily drivers. Check the specs table above for seating and body type.

Which has better fuel economy, the Ford Expedition or the Infiniti QX56?

The Ford Expedition is more fuel-efficient on paper: 13.8 L/100km combined versus 15.3 L/100km for the Infiniti QX56, based on the best-equipped catalogued version of each.

Which is cheaper to maintain, the Ford Expedition or the Infiniti QX56?

Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but reliability signals above are the closest proxy: fewer reported issues generally means lower repair costs over time.