CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
Brands/Cadillac/SRX
Cadillac SRX

Photo: Tino Rossini from Toronto, Canada / CC BY 2.0 / Wikimedia Commons

Cadillac

Cadillac SRX

Crossover · Gas · 11 versions · owner report

CompareFind my car

Every generation

Should I buy a 2009–2016 SRX?
Should I buy a 2003–2009 SRX?
324Hp

Power

130mph

Top speed (210 km/h)

18–19mpg

Combined, EPA 2016

Typical asking price (US)$6,900–$12,283median $10,061 · 45 live listings · 2007–2016

What owners say

Our take, from owner reports

Sentiment is sharply divided and heavily dependent on model year, powertrain, and maintenance history.

9 problems reported (3 very frequent, 5 recurrent, 1 isolated) · high confidence

Problems owners report

  • Very frequentTransmission failure

    Complete destruction, slipping, shifting problems, torque converter shudder. Described as a $3,800+ repair.

  • Very frequent3.6L Engine timing chain problems

    Expensive repair ($2,000-$4,000), engine failure, driveability issues.

  • Very frequentHeadlight system failures

    Complete burnout, extremely dim output, particularly on 2016 models. Requires replacement with potential need for CANbus regulators for LED upgrades.

+ 6 more issuesShow fewer
  • RecurrentCUE (Cadillac User Experience) infotainment system failures

    Screen glitches, unresponsiveness, complete failure.

  • RecurrentElectrical & accessory failures

    Window regulators/motors, door locks/latches, liftgate actuator, ignition switch problems causing key to stick or vehicle to stall.

  • RecurrentEngine seizing/major failure

    Even on low-mileage or recently replaced engines.

  • RecurrentPower steering failure

    Noted as a chronic issue for 2010 model year.

  • RecurrentSuspension/vibration issues

    Shaking at specific highway speeds (50-78 mph / 80-126 km/h), clunking from front end, often related to CV axles or steering components.

  • IsolatedOil consumption

    Engines burning oil, requiring frequent top-ups.

The version owners recommend

Insufficient owner data available to declare a consensus "best" version. Anecdotal praise exists for well-maintained examples of the 2014 SRX Premium with the 3.6L engine, and for the first-generation V8 AWD models with the MagnaRide suspension. However, the data is dominated by warnings to avoid the 2010-2013 model years of the second generation due to pervasive powertrain issues.

Competitors to consider

Owners compare it most often with the Lexus RX, Acura MDX, Audi Q5, BMW X5 and Infiniti FX.

Is the SRX right for you?

Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.

Ask about your car →
Full owner reportHide full owner report

Overall sentiment

Sentiment is sharply divided and heavily dependent on model year, powertrain, and maintenance history. The second-generation model (2010-2016) is frequently described as a significant reliability and financial liability, with very frequent reports of catastrophic and expensive failures involving the transmission, 3.6L engine (particularly timing chains), and electrical systems. Owners who experience these issues characterize the vehicle as an absolute money pit that falls apart after 5-6 years and plummets in resale value. In stark contrast, a minority of owners report positive long-term experiences with specific examples, citing good reliability with basic maintenance, comfortable rides, and a pleasing, powerful powertrain. The first-generation model (2004-2009) receives mixed feedback, with some praising its sporty, RWD-based driving dynamics and V8 power, while others report it as a problematic vehicle that never ran right. The overwhelming consensus from the community feedback is one of high risk, with severe financial consequences for owners who encounter the well-documented major failures.

Positioning vs competitors

Positioned as a more affordable initial purchase compared to contemporary luxury rivals like Lexus RX, Audi Q5, and BMW X5, but with dramatically higher long-term ownership costs and worse reliability, negating any upfront savings. Frequently compared unfavorably to mainstream brands like Toyota and Honda for long-term durability. The first-generation model is noted for its unique, sportier RWD platform and driving dynamics, which were competitive with contemporary German and Japanese sport-utility vehicles. The second generation is viewed as a less reliable, more expensive version of shared GM platform vehicles (e.g., Chevrolet Equinox, GMC Terrain) without delivering commensurate luxury or durability.

Recommended configurations

A pre-purchase inspection by a trusted mechanic is considered non-negotiable, with a specific focus on the transmission, engine (for timing chain noise), and power steering system. An extended warranty (GM protection plan or reputable third-party) is strongly recommended if purchasing a second-generation model. For tall drivers, the SRX is noted as a comfortable crossover with good seating position.

General recommendations

Only recommended for buyers who are mechanically adept, have access to affordable repairs, or have secured a comprehensive extended warranty. Not recommended as a primary vehicle for those with tight budgets or low risk tolerance. Buyers are urged to avoid high-mileage examples (especially over 100,000 miles) and to be extremely wary of sellers claiming "nothing is wrong." Aggressive negotiation is advised given the model's poor reputation and high depreciation. For those seeking a reliable luxury SUV, competitors from Lexus or Acura are consistently suggested as superior alternatives. The vehicle may satisfy those who prioritize initial purchase price and comfort but are prepared for potential major repairs.

Remarks

The reliability narrative is heavily generation-dependent. The second-generation SRX (2010-2016) is the primary source of severe criticism, with its GM Lambda platform and high-feature content leading to complex, costly failures. The 2010 model year is singled out as particularly problematic. The first-generation model (2004-2009), while not without issues, receives some nostalgic praise for its driving character but is still reported to have significant reliability problems by some owners. A secret warranty program from GM is mentioned covering headlight failures on some models. The community feedback strongly suggests that a well-maintained, low-mileage example is an exception rather than the rule, and extreme due diligence is required when considering purchase. Analysis based on approximately 45 substantive owner discussions and evaluations.

Generation by generation

Owner insights per generation and US complaint/recall records (NHTSA).

Complaints and recalls by model yearWorst year: 2010. Years to avoid: 2011, 2010Source: NHTSA (US)Show table

Each year graded against the model's other years: Year Score. See all Cadillac SRX years to avoid

YearComplaintsRecallsMost-reported area
20161682exterior lighting
20154424exterior lighting
20143902exterior lighting
20133935exterior lighting
20124163exterior lighting
20114467exterior lighting
20104746exterior lighting
2009270air bags
2008470power train
2007521power train
2006683engine
20051223electrical system
20042187electronic stability control (esc)

Complaint counts come from owner reports filed with the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Higher-selling years naturally accumulate more complaints.

Recall notices43 on record · Source: NHTSA (US)Show recalls

2016 · suspension:rearcampaign 21V473000

General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles. The rear suspension toe link adjuster may not have been tightened properly, which could result in a loose toe link.

2016 · air bags:frontal:driver side:inflator modulecampaign 26V329000

General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2015 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV, XTS, 2015-2016 Cadillac ATS, CTS, and SRX vehicles. The front-driver air bag inflator may rupture during deployment.

2015 · seatscampaign 14V804000

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured November 11, 2014, to December 3, 2014. The front driver's seat may have been built with an incorrect seat track bracket. Drivers' seats with this condition may not be properly attached to the seat track.

2015 · suspension:rearcampaign 14V571000

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured April 14, 2009, to September 1, 2014, and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles manufactured February 1, 2011, to September 13, 2011. On the affected vehicles, the jam nut in the rear suspension toe adjuster link may not be torqued to the proper specification. A loose toe adjuster link can cause the vehicle to sway or wander at highway speeds. A loose toe adjuster link may lead to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the toe adjuster link will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.

2015 · suspension:rearcampaign 21V473000

General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles. The rear suspension toe link adjuster may not have been tightened properly, which could result in a loose toe link.

2015 · air bags:frontal:driver side:inflator modulecampaign 26V329000

General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2015 Cadillac Escalade, Escalade ESV, XTS, 2015-2016 Cadillac ATS, CTS, and SRX vehicles. The front-driver air bag inflator may rupture during deployment.

2014 · suspension:rearcampaign 14V571000

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured April 14, 2009, to September 1, 2014, and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles manufactured February 1, 2011, to September 13, 2011. On the affected vehicles, the jam nut in the rear suspension toe adjuster link may not be torqued to the proper specification. A loose toe adjuster link can cause the vehicle to sway or wander at highway speeds. A loose toe adjuster link may lead to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the toe adjuster link will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.

2014 · suspension:rearcampaign 21V473000

General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles. The rear suspension toe link adjuster may not have been tightened properly, which could result in a loose toe link.

2013 · suspension:rearcampaign 14V571000

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured April 14, 2009, to September 1, 2014, and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles manufactured February 1, 2011, to September 13, 2011. On the affected vehicles, the jam nut in the rear suspension toe adjuster link may not be torqued to the proper specification. A loose toe adjuster link can cause the vehicle to sway or wander at highway speeds. A loose toe adjuster link may lead to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the toe adjuster link will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.

2013 · power train:automatic transmission:control module (tcm/pcm/tecm)campaign 14V212000

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2013 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured May 29, 2012, through June 26, 2013, and equipped with 3.6L engines. In the affected vehicles, in certain driving situations, there may be a three to four second lag in acceleration due to the transmission control module (TCM) programming.

2013 · power train:automatic transmissioncampaign 13V097000

General Motors (GM) is recalling certain model year 2013 Buick LaCrosse vehicles, manufactured between April 25, 2012, through March 6, 2013, and model year 2013 Cadillac SRX vehicles, manufactured between May 29, 2012, through February 18, 2013 for failing to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 102, "Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking Effect." A software problem may cause the transmission to inadvertently shift to Sport mode removing any transmission-related engine braking effect.

2013 · wheels:lugs/nuts/bolts/studscampaign 13V202000

General Motors (GM) is recalling certain model year 2013 Cadillac SRX vehicles, manufactured January 31, 2012, through March 18, 2013, and equipped with 18 inch wheels. On the affected vehicles, the wheel lug nuts may loosen.

2013 · suspension:rearcampaign 21V473000

General Motors, LLC (GM) is recalling certain 2010-2016 Cadillac SRX and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles. The rear suspension toe link adjuster may not have been tightened properly, which could result in a loose toe link.

2012 · seats:front assembly:power adjustcampaign 14V447000

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2011-2012 Buick LaCrosse, Regal and Chevrolet Camaro, as well as certain 2010-2012 Cadillac SRX, Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain vehicles, equipped with power height adjustable driver and passenger seats. In the affected vehicles, the bolt that secures the driver's and passenger's power front seat height adjuster may fall out causing the seat to drop suddenly to the lowest vertical position.

2012 · suspension:rearcampaign 14V571000

General Motors LLC (GM) is recalling certain model year 2010-2015 Cadillac SRX vehicles manufactured April 14, 2009, to September 1, 2014, and 2011-2012 Saab 9-4X vehicles manufactured February 1, 2011, to September 13, 2011. On the affected vehicles, the jam nut in the rear suspension toe adjuster link may not be torqued to the proper specification. A loose toe adjuster link can cause the vehicle to sway or wander at highway speeds. A loose toe adjuster link may lead to thread damage and eventual failure. Failure of the toe adjuster link will cause an abrupt change in the vehicle's alignment.

28 older recalls not shown. Check nhtsa.gov with your VIN for the full history.

Specifications

3.6 V6

6-cylinder · 308 hp · AWD · automatic

Built 2013–2016

Power308 Hp
Torque266 lb-ft (360 Nm)
DriveAll wheel drive (4x4)
Transmission6 gears, automatic transmission
AspirationNaturally aspirated engine
Cylinders6
Seats5 seats
Fuel typeGas
Body typeCrossover

Explore this car

Analyze this car
  • Find an upgrade
  • Compare with another car
  • Not sure? Answer 5 quick questions

Quick facts

Brand
Cadillac
Versions catalogued
11
Body types
Crossover
Owner report
Available

Compare with

  • SRX vs Acura MDX
  • SRX vs Audi Q5
  • SRX vs BMW X5
  • SRX vs Infiniti FX
  • SRX vs Lexus RX

CarWizz

Car picks from owner reports, US listing prices and EPA data.

BrandsBest carsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&AYear ScoreStudiesQuizAbout
PrivacyTermsCookiesLegal notice

© 2026 CarWizz