CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
CarWizz
BrandsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&A
Find my car
Brands/Dodge/Charger
Dodge

Dodge Charger

Liftback · Gas · 44 versions · owner report

Ranked #5 of 5 used full-size cars on owner data, price and fuel economy

CompareFind my car

Every generation

Should I buy one?
Should I buy one?
Should I buy one?
797Hp

Power

3.5s

0–62 mph (0–100 km/h)

203mph

Top speed (327 km/h)

75–86MPGe

Combined, EPA 2027

Typical asking price (US)$15,969–$40,489median $26,998 · 44 live listings

What owners say

Our take, from owner reports

Sentiment is sharply divided by generation and powertrain.

11 problems reported (2 very frequent, 7 recurrent, 2 isolated) · medium confidence

Problems owners report

  • Very frequentSoftware glitches and infotainment system failures
  • Very frequentPoor build quality and panel fit
  • RecurrentElectrical system failures and communication errors between control modules (TCM, PCM)
+ 8 more issuesShow fewer
  • RecurrentTransmission problems
  • RecurrentEngine issues, including spark plug failures and coolant system leaks (thermostat housing)
  • RecurrentInterior build quality and material quality, particularly in base trims
  • RecurrentCharging infrastructure compatibility issues (e.g., with Freewire chargers)
  • Recurrent12V battery failures
  • RecurrentGeneral reliability concerns and lack of dealer support for repairs
  • IsolatedOil leaks (e.g., from oil filter housing)
  • IsolatedFuel pump failures

The version owners recommend

For ICE models, the V8-powered R/T trim (2015 or newer with the ZF 8-speed automatic transmission) is frequently recommended as the minimum for a satisfying ownership experience that matches the car's heritage. The V6 models are acknowledged as adequate for daily driving but described as an "unsatisfactory experience" for enthusiasts. Higher trims (Scat Pack, SRT) are noted for their significant performance but come with higher costs. There is no positive consensus on a "best version" of the EV model from the available owner data.

Competitors to consider

Owners compare it most often with the Tesla Model 3, Ford Mustang, Chevrolet Camaro, Honda Civic and Toyota Camry.

Is the Charger right for you?

Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.

Ask about your car →
Full owner reportHide full owner report

Overall sentiment

Sentiment is sharply divided by generation and powertrain. For the long-running internal combustion (ICE) models (approximately 2011-2023), the sentiment is generally positive among owners, who praise the vehicles for their comfortable highway ride, powerful V8 engine options, iconic styling, spacious interior, and perceived value for a performance sedan. These models are described as reliable daily drivers when properly maintained, with some high-mileage examples reported. However, a recurrent criticism centers on build quality and reliability, with specific complaints about electrical issues, transmission problems, and cheap interior materials in lower trims. For the all-new 2025+ Dodge Charger Daytona EV, the sentiment is overwhelmingly negative based on early reviews and owner discussions. It is heavily criticized for poor build quality ("poorly fit panels"), pervasive software glitches and infotainment issues, disappointing real-world charging performance, and a fundamental identity crisis as an electric vehicle attempting to mimic traditional muscle car characteristics. The consensus indicates that while the legacy ICE Charger is a flawed but beloved muscle sedan, the new EV iteration is viewed as a deeply problematic and uncompelling product in its initial release.

Positioning vs competitors

The ICE Charger is positioned as a large, powerful, and comfortable rear-wheel-drive American muscle sedan, offering more interior space and a more relaxed ride than competitors like the Ford Mustang or Chevrolet Camaro. It is frequently compared unfavorably to Japanese sedans (Camry, Accord, Mazda 6) in terms of long-term reliability and interior fit-and-finish but is favored for its performance and styling. In the police vehicle segment, it is noted for its purpose-built "Pursuit" package with heavy-duty components, ballistic protection, and integrated law enforcement electronics, which mainstream sedans lack. The EV Charger is positioned against other electric sedans but is critically panned for failing to match the refinement, software stability, or charging infrastructure compatibility of established competitors like Tesla.

Recommended configurations

For ICE models: A 2015 or newer V8 R/T with the ZF 8-speed automatic transmission is strongly recommended. The AWD system is noted as a benefit for winter climates. Higher trim levels (Plus, Premium packages) are suggested to improve interior quality. A thorough pre-purchase inspection is emphasized, especially for used examples. For the EV model: No positive configuration recommendations are present; warnings to avoid the vehicle entirely are recurrent.

General recommendations

ICE models are recommended for buyers seeking a spacious, powerful, and stylish American sedan who are willing to accept potential reliability issues and higher operating costs. A significant down payment and aggressive negotiation are advised due to high depreciation. A pre-purchase inspection by a trusted mechanic is considered essential. For younger or first-time buyers, high insurance costs are a major consideration. The EV model is not recommended based on the available feedback, which cites fundamental quality and software problems. If considering an EV Charger, an extensive test drive focusing on infotainment and build quality is critical, and purchasers should verify the availability of competent dealer service support for EVs.

Remarks

The data covers multiple distinct vehicle generations: the classic ICE platform produced from approximately 2011-2023 and the all-new STLA Large platform used for the 2025+ electric Charger Daytona. Feedback on the ICE models is based on long-term ownership reports, while feedback on the EV is almost exclusively from early reviews and initial owner experiences, indicating significant "teething issues." There is a notable absence of positive long-term data for the EV variant. The ICE Charger's reputation benefits from a long production run where many issues were reportedly addressed over time. Analysis based on approximately 50 substantive owner discussions and review summaries.

Generation by generation

Owner insights per generation and US complaint/recall records (NHTSA).

Charger VIII2024–202667 complaints · 7 recallshigh confidenceRead report

Most-reported areas (NHTSA): electrical system (46) · power train (15) · fuel/propulsion system (14)

Our take, from owner reports

Owner sentiment toward the 2024-2026 Charger is mixed and heavily colored by the loss of the V8, with a vocal share of discussions expressing disappointment that no V8 is offered and that the car is very heavy and expensive.

16 problems reported (1 very frequent, 5 recurrent, 10 isolated) · high confidence

Problems owners report

  • Very frequentConcerns about first-year build quality and reliability expressed as a reason to wait
  • RecurrentPanel gaps and inconsistent panel alignment, including on the trunk lid
  • RecurrentExcessive weight criticized as undermining performance
+ 13 more issuesShow fewer
  • RecurrentHigh pricing criticized relative to the car's positioning
  • RecurrentStyling criticized as not aggressive enough or not muscular
  • RecurrentDepreciation concerns, especially on the EV variant
  • IsolatedElectrical and software failures causing the car to become undrivable or "brick"
  • IsolatedMaintenance and service access described as unusually difficult
  • IsolatedCheck engine light appearing on a nearly new straight-six car
  • IsolatedTransmission problem reported after one day of ownership
  • IsolatedLemon-law-level repeated problems across multiple systems on a new car
  • IsolatedFront and rear fascias appearing a different shade than the rest of the body
  • IsolatedCurb rash and cracked windshield on low-profile tire cars
  • IsolatedSteering wheel design criticized
  • IsolatedDigital speedometer skipping numbers during acceleration
  • IsolatedSpeed limiter set low, reportedly tied to tire speed rating

Is a 2024–2026 Charger right for you?

Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.

Ask about your car →
Full 8th generation page with recall records
Charger VII (LD)2011–20234,610 complaints · 86 recallshigh confidenceRead report

Most-reported areas (NHTSA): electrical system (1728) · engine (628) · power train (503)

Our take, from owner reports

Owners of the 2011-2023 Charger generally describe it as a reliable, practical large sedan whose long production run worked out most of the brand's older reliability complaints.

15 problems reported (4 recurrent, 11 isolated) · high confidence

Problems owners report

  • RecurrentWater pump leak or failure
  • RecurrentThermostat housing and thermostat failure
  • RecurrentLifter failure, particularly on the 5.7 Hemi and Pentastar V6
+ 12 more issuesShow fewer
  • RecurrentHemi lubrication issue at low RPM and idle causing premature hydraulic lifter wear
  • IsolatedCylinder deactivation (MDS) problems
  • IsolatedRear differential seal weeping
  • IsolatedHID headlight fuse burnout
  • IsolatedPlastic parts cracking, including oil cooler and sensor connectors
  • IsolatedCoolant leak from degraded sealant at the coolant reservoir
  • IsolatedTiming chain or timing belt service due around 100k miles
  • IsolatedTransmission issues on high-mileage examples
  • IsolatedPower window motor or obstruction failure
  • IsolatedAWD system warning light
  • IsolatedEngine tick or knock noted during inspection
  • IsolatedAirbag deployment recall

Is a 2011–2023 Charger right for you?

Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.

Ask about your car →
Full 7th generation page with recall records
Charger VI (LX)2006–20102,901 complaints · 27 recallshigh confidenceRead report

Most-reported areas (NHTSA): electrical system (714) · engine (651) · power train (496)

Our take, from owner reports

Owner sentiment on the 2006-2010 Charger is sharply divided and heavily dependent on engine choice, model year, and how the car was treated.

14 problems reported (1 very frequent, 9 recurrent, 4 isolated) · high confidence

Problems owners report

  • Very frequentFront suspension wear, including tie rods, sway bar links, bushings, and tension struts
  • RecurrentValve seat failure causing engine destruction on early Hemi cars
  • RecurrentLifter and camshaft wear on 5.7L Hemi cars, sometimes linked to MDS
+ 11 more issuesShow fewer
  • RecurrentTransmission concerns, including lurching, delayed shifting, and sensor failure
  • RecurrentElectrical faults including dash lights, gauges, traction control, and ABS warning lights
  • RecurrentWheel speed sensor failure causing ABS and traction control lights
  • Recurrent2.7L V6 oil sludging and design flaws
  • RecurrentBattery and charging issues causing multiple warning lights and no-start conditions
  • RecurrentCooling system problems, including coolant leaks and water pump and timing chain expense on V6s
  • RecurrentWindow fogging and moisture intrusion, including water under the carpet
  • IsolatedPaint and rust problems, particularly on east-coast cars
  • IsolatedSteering rack and driveshaft failure at very high mileage
  • IsolatedPCM failure causing stalling
  • IsolatedHeaders without a tune causing lean running and backfire codes

Is a 2006–2010 Charger right for you?

Get an answer for your year, mileage and budget.

Ask about your car →
Full 6th generation page with recall records
Complaints and recalls by model yearWorst year: 2011. Years to avoid: 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2006Source: NHTSA (US)Show table

Each year graded against the model's other years: Year Score. See all Dodge Charger years to avoid

YearComplaintsRecallsMost-reported area
202651electrical system
2025383electrical system
2024243electrical system
2023782electrical system
2022483electrical system
20211022air bags
2020573air bags
20193325air bags
20183426electrical system
20172494electrical system
20163546structure
20152728power train
201468911electrical system
20137279electrical system

Complaint counts come from owner reports filed with the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Higher-selling years naturally accumulate more complaints.

Recall notices120 on record · Source: NHTSA (US)Show recalls

2026 · back over prevention: sensing system: cameracampaign 26V531000

Chrysler (FCA US, LLC) is recalling certain 2026 Jeep Wrangler, Jeep Gladiator, Jeep Compass, Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Grand Cherokee L, Jeep Grand Wagoneer, Jeep Grand Wagoneer L, Ram Promaster, Ram Promaster EV, Ram 1500, Ram 2500, Chrysler Pacifica Plug-In Hybrid, Chrysler Voyager, and 2026-2027 Chrysler Pacifica and Dodge Charger vehicles. The rearview camera image may fail to display when the vehicle is placed in reverse. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 111, "Rear Visibility."

2025 · electrical system: instrument cluster/panelcampaign 26V262000

Chrysler (FCA US, LLC) is recalling certain 2024-2025 Jeep Wagoneer S and Dodge Charger electric vehicles. A software error may cause the instrument panel display to fail. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard numbers 108, "Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment," 126, "Electronic Stability Control Systems for Light Vehicles," 135, "Light Vehicle Brake Systems," 138, "Tire Pressure Monitoring System," and/or 208, "Occupant Crash Protection."

2025 · back over prevention:warnings:external/pedestrian alertcampaign 25V389000

Chrysler (FCA US, LLC) is recalling certain 2024-2025 Dodge Charger vehicles. The amplifier may be missing software, which can prevent the amplifier from emitting exterior sound, including pedestrian warnings. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 141, "Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid Electric Vehicles."

2025 · power train:automatic transmission:internal:park pawlcampaign 25V574000

Chrysler (FCA US, LLC) is recalling certain 2024-2025 Dodge Charger and Jeep Wagoneer S electric vehicles. An incorrectly installed spring may cause the loss of the park function when the vehicle’s gear selector is placed in the park (P) position, which can result in a vehicle rollaway. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 114, "Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention."

2024 · electrical system: instrument cluster/panelcampaign 26V262000

Chrysler (FCA US, LLC) is recalling certain 2024-2025 Jeep Wagoneer S and Dodge Charger electric vehicles. A software error may cause the instrument panel display to fail. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard numbers 108, "Lamps, Reflective Devices, and Associated Equipment," 126, "Electronic Stability Control Systems for Light Vehicles," 135, "Light Vehicle Brake Systems," 138, "Tire Pressure Monitoring System," and/or 208, "Occupant Crash Protection."

2024 · back over prevention:warnings:external/pedestrian alertcampaign 25V389000

Chrysler (FCA US, LLC) is recalling certain 2024-2025 Dodge Charger vehicles. The amplifier may be missing software, which can prevent the amplifier from emitting exterior sound, including pedestrian warnings. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 141, "Minimum Sound Requirements for Hybrid Electric Vehicles."

2024 · power train:automatic transmission:internal:park pawlcampaign 25V574000

Chrysler (FCA US, LLC) is recalling certain 2024-2025 Dodge Charger and Jeep Wagoneer S electric vehicles. An incorrectly installed spring may cause the loss of the park function when the vehicle’s gear selector is placed in the park (P) position, which can result in a vehicle rollaway. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) number 114, "Theft Protection and Rollaway Prevention."

2023 · parking brakecampaign 24V112000

Chrysler (FCA US, LLC) is recalling certain 2023 Chrysler 300, Dodge Charger, and Dodge Challenger vehicles. The parking brake may be improperly adjusted, which can result in a vehicle roll away. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 135, "Light Vehicle Brake Systems."

2023 · seats:critical fastenerscampaign 24V574000

Chrysler (FCA US, LLC) is recalling certain 2023 Dodge Charger vehicles. The left rear seat back may not lock in the upright position. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 207, "Seating Systems."

2022 · tires:pressure monitoring and regulating systemscampaign 22V504000

Chrysler (FCA US LLC) is recalling certain 2022 Dodge Challenger, Dodge Charger, and Chrysler 300 vehicles. The Tire Pressure Monitoring System (TPMS) sensor battery may fail prematurely and cause the sensor to become inoperative. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 138, "Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems."

2022 · tires:pressure monitoring and regulating systemscampaign 22V808000

Chrysler (FCA US LLC) is recalling certain 2022 Dodge Challenger, Dodge Charger, and Chrysler 300 vehicles. The Tire Pressure Monitoring System (TPMS) sensor battery may fail prematurely and cause the sensor to become inoperative. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 138, "Tire Pressure Monitoring Systems."

2022 · power train:manual transmission:column shift assemblycampaign 22V866000

Chrysler (FCA US, LLC) is recalling certain 2022 Dodge Charger and Durango vehicles. The shifter assembly was not properly heat-treated, which can prevent the shifter from properly engaging in the "drive" position.

2021 · visibility:windshieldcampaign 21V516000

Chrysler (FCA US, LLC) is recalling certain 2020-2021 Dodge Challenger, Dodge Charger, and Chrysler 300 vehicles. During manufacturing, the windshield may not have been properly bonded to the vehicle, allowing it to detach in a crash. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 212, "Windshield Mounting."

2021 · air bags:side/window:curtain:inflatorcampaign 24V198000

Chrysler (FCA US, LLC) (Stellantis) is recalling certain 2018-2021 Dodge Charger and Chrysler 300 vehicles. The right and left side curtain air bag inflators may rupture due to a manufacturing defect.

2020 · back over prevention: sensing system: cameracampaign 20V512000

Chrysler (FCA US LLC) is recalling certain 2018-2020 Dodge Charger Pursuit vehicles equipped with a "stealth mode." When stealth mode is selected, the backup camera rearview image will not display when the vehicle is in reverse. As such, these vehicles fail to comply with the requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard number 111, "Rearview Mirrors."

105 older recalls not shown. Check nhtsa.gov with your VIN for the full history.

Specifications

SIXPACK 3.0L HO

3.0L 6-cylinder · 550 hp · AWD · automatic

Built 2025–2026

Power550 Hp
Torque531 lb-ft (720 Nm)
0–62 mph (0–100 km/h)3.9 sec
Top speed177 mph (285 km/h)
Fuel (maker's test)19 mpg (12.4 L/100 km)
DriveAll wheel drive (4x4)
Transmission8 gears, automatic transmission
Engine3 L
AspirationTwin Turbo, Intercooler
Cylinders6
Seats5 seats
Fuel typeGas
Body typeLiftback

Explore this car

Analyze this car
  • Find an upgrade
  • Compare with another car
  • Not sure? Answer 5 quick questions

Quick facts

Brand
Dodge
Versions catalogued
44
Body types
Liftback, Sedan
Owner report
Available

Compare with

  • Charger vs Chevrolet Camaro
  • Charger vs Chrysler 300
  • Charger vs Ford Mustang
  • Charger vs Honda Accord
  • Charger vs Tesla Model 3

CarWizz

Car picks from owner reports, US listing prices and EPA data.

BrandsBest carsReliabilityCompareLook up a carQ&AYear ScoreStudiesQuizAbout
PrivacyTermsCookiesLegal notice

© 2026 CarWizz