Acura
CL
Nissan
Maxima
Acura CL vs Nissan Maxima: 2019 Comparison
The short answer
Based on available data, the Nissan Maxima comes out ahead of the Acura CL on power. Check the specs table and owner sentiment below for the full comparison before deciding between the two. Both are covered by real owner reports on CarWizz.
Specs side by side
What owners say
CL
Overall
Generally positive sentiment for first-generation model, viewed as reliable, comfortable entry-level luxury coupe with decent performance from 2.3L 4-cylinder engine. Praised for smooth ride quality, practical interior space, and Honda build quality at affordable used prices ($1,500-$3,000 range in 2015-2020 period). Criticism centers on underpowered 2.3L engine lacking sporty character, automatic transmission being sluggish and unengaging, mediocre handling dynamics, and dated 1990s interior design.
Best version to buy
2.3L Manual Transmission Manual transmission strongly preferred over automatic for improved engagement and reliability, though extremely rare in marketplace. The 3.0L V6 automatic considered acceptable compromise for buyers prioritizing power over manual gearbox.
Known issues
- ⚠• Automatic transmission failure, slipping between gears, delayed engagement, complete failure typically 150,000-200,000 miles (241,000-322,000 km), rebuild cost $1,500-$2,500, recurrent * Timing belt service requirement, replacement due ev…
Maxima
Overall
Sentiment is sharply divided by generation, with a clear consensus that reliability and owner satisfaction declined significantly after the early 2000s. Owners of late 1990s and early 2000s models (e.g., 1998, 1999, 2002, 2003) report extremely high satisfaction, describing these vehicles as "amazing," "bulletproof," and capable of reaching very high mileages (260,000-300,000 miles) with only basic maintenance. These generations are frequently praised for their engaging drive, solid build quality, and low cost of ownership.
Best version to buy
Late 1990s to early 2000s models (specifically mentioned: 1998, 1999, 2002, 2003). These are consistently highlighted as the peak for reliability, build quality, and driving enjoyment.
Known issues
- ⚠Catastrophic CVT failure: Premature failure often before 100,000 miles, characterized by slipping, jerking, loss of power, and high operating temperatures. Considered a severe safety risk. Frequency: very frequent (2013+ models).
- ⚠CVT reliability concerns: General anxiety about long-term durability, transmission "whine," and expensive repair costs ($6,000+ for a rebuild). Frequency: very frequent.
- ⚠Jerky acceleration and shifting: Especially noted in 2016 and 2022 models, with stuttering during gear simulation and unresponsive throttle. Frequency: recurrent.
The verdict
The Nissan Maxima is the better choice for most buyers.
It has more power on its best-equipped version than the Acura CL, based on the data above. If efficiency matters more to you than outright power, the Acura CL is worth a closer look instead.
Explore further
Not sure which one fits you?
Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more reliable, the Acura CL or the Nissan Maxima?
Owner reports show similar reliability sentiment for the Acura CL and the Nissan Maxima. Check the known issues listed above for specific differences between the two.
Which is better for families, the Acura CL or the Nissan Maxima?
Both seat a similar number of passengers based on our data. The Acura CL is classed as a Coupe, the Nissan Maxima as a Sedan, which affects cargo space and ride height for family use.
Which has better fuel economy, the Acura CL or the Nissan Maxima?
Fuel consumption data is limited for one or both models. Check the specs table above for the figures available on each catalogued version.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Acura CL or the Nissan Maxima?
Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but owner reports mention cost-related concerns more often for the Nissan Maxima than the Acura CL. See the known issues comparison above.