Chevrolet
Cruze
Kia
Forte
Chevrolet Cruze vs Kia Forte: 2021 Comparison
The short answer
The Chevrolet Cruze offers fuel economy, while the Kia Forte excels at power instead. Choose the Chevrolet Cruze if you prioritize fuel economy in daily driving, or the Kia Forte if power matters more for your needs. Both are covered by real owner reports on CarWizz.
Specs side by side
What owners say
Cruze
Overall
Overwhelmingly negative sentiment for the first-generation Cruze (model years approximately 2009-2016), with widespread reports of severe and frequent mechanical failures leading to high ownership costs and frustration. This generation is frequently described as one of the worst vehicles owners have experienced. Sentiment for the second generation (approximately 2016-2019) is mixed but notably more positive, with some owners reporting good reliability and satisfaction, particularly with highway comfort and fuel economy.
Best version to buy
Second-generation models (2016-2019) are strongly preferred over the first generation. Within the second generation, the 1.4L turbocharged gasoline engine paired with the conventional 6-speed automatic transmission is recommended over the CVT (found in the Spark) for better reliability.
Known issues
- ⚠**First Generation (2009-2016) Issues:** Coolant system leaks/failures: leading to overheating and potential engine destruction. Very frequent. Turbocharger failures: around 90,000 miles (145,000 km). Very frequent.
- ⚠**Second Generation (2016-2019) Issues:** Coolant system seepage/leaks: noted as a slower issue than Gen 1. Recurrent. Oil leaks: from valve cover and oil filter housing. Recurrent.
Forte
Overall
Sentiment is mixed and heavily dependent on model year and powertrain. The Forte is widely regarded as a solid value proposition, offering good features, technology, and interior space for the money, particularly when purchased new or lightly used with the remaining manufacturer warranty. Long-term owner reports praise its practicality, fuel efficiency, and comfort as a daily driver.
Best version to buy
Insufficient owner data available to declare a single "best" version. Feedback is fragmented by generation and trim.
Known issues
- ⚠Engine failure (oil consumption, piston ring issues, catastrophic failure): particularly noted in pre-2019 GDI engines and some Theta II engines; some reports of replacement under warranty. Frequency: recurrent.
- ⚠CVT/IVT transmission reliability concerns: noted for premature failure, especially in belt-driven units from 2019 to mid-2021; design updated to chain-driven in 2021+ models. Frequency: recurrent.
- ⚠Long-term build quality and durability: older models (e.g., 2010-2014) reported with issues like rusted brake lines, exhaust perforation, and interior rattles developing sooner than competitors like Toyota. Frequency: recurrent.
The verdict
The Chevrolet Cruze is the better choice for most buyers.
It has better fuel economy on its best-equipped version than the Kia Forte, based on the data above. If power matters more to you than running costs, the Kia Forte is worth a closer look instead.
Explore further
Not sure which one fits you?
Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more reliable, the Chevrolet Cruze or the Kia Forte?
Owner reports show similar reliability sentiment for the Chevrolet Cruze and the Kia Forte. Check the known issues listed above for specific differences between the two.
Which is better for families, the Chevrolet Cruze or the Kia Forte?
Data on family-specific factors like cargo space is limited for one or both models, but based on available reports, both are positioned as practical daily drivers. Check the specs table above for seating and body type.
Which has better fuel economy, the Chevrolet Cruze or the Kia Forte?
The Chevrolet Cruze is more fuel-efficient on paper: 5.8 L/100km combined versus 7.8 L/100km for the Kia Forte, based on the best-equipped catalogued version of each.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Chevrolet Cruze or the Kia Forte?
Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but reliability signals above are the closest proxy: fewer reported issues generally means lower repair costs over time.