Brands/Hyundai/Compare
Hyundai Tucson
Hyundai

Hyundai

Tucson

Owner report
Nissan Rogue
Nissan

Nissan

Rogue

Owner report

Hyundai Tucson vs Nissan Rogue: 2025 Comparison

Updated June 2026

The short answer

Based on available data, the Hyundai Tucson comes out ahead of the Nissan Rogue on fuel economy and power. Check the specs table and owner sentiment below for the full comparison before deciding between the two. Both are covered by real owner reports on CarWizz.

Specs side by side

Specification
Tucson
Rogue
Typical price (used, US)
$24,059–$28,930
$28,639–$34,784
Power
288 Hp
248 Hp
Torque
379 Nm
450 Nm
Acceleration
7.6s
N/A
Top speed
206 km/h
N/A
Fuel consumption
3.2 L/100km
9 L/100km
Drive
All wheel drive
All wheel drive
Transmission
6 gears, automatic
1 gears, automatic
Engine
1.6 L
2.4 L
Seats
5
7
Body type
SUV
SUV

What owners say

Tucson

Overall

Sentiment is mixed and varies significantly by model year and powertrain. For the current generation (2022+), particularly hybrid and plug-in hybrid (PHEV) variants, owner feedback is generally positive, praising the quiet ride, comfortable interior, strong driver assistance features, and good value proposition. However, this is tempered by recurrent reports of significant electrical and powertrain issues, including dashboard/infotainment blackouts, 12-volt battery failures, and transmission problems leading to "limp mode." For the previous generation (approx. 2015-2021), feedback is more negative, citing reliability concerns, engine problems (including a specific mention of fuel injector failure on a 2022 model), and a general perception of lower long-term reliability compared to key Japanese competitors.

Best version to buy

Hybrid or Plug-in Hybrid (PHEV) trims, specifically the higher "Limited" or "Ultimate" trims. These are praised for their efficiency, quiet operation, and comprehensive feature sets.

Known issues

  • **Current Generation (2022-2026):** * **Dashboard/Infotainment Blackouts:** Complete instrument cluster and center screen failures while driving at highway speeds. Dealers often cannot replicate, leaving issue unresolved.
  • **Previous Generation (e.g., 2015-2021):** * **General Engine Reliability Concerns:** Mentions of oil consumption issues and catastrophic engine failure in high-mileage examples (e.g., 2016 model with ~200,000 miles).
  • **Cross-Generation:** * **Dealership Experience:** Negative experiences with sales tactics (bait-and-switch on pricing) and service departments unable to diagnose intermittent issues. Frequency: recurrent.

Rogue

Overall

Sentiment is sharply divided by generation and powertrain. For models from approximately 2011-2020 equipped with the 2.5L four-cylinder and traditional CVT, sentiment is overwhelmingly negative, dominated by widespread and severe concerns over CVT transmission reliability, which is described as a notorious, well-known failure point. Long-term owners of these generations report transmissions failing between 67,000 and 130,000 miles, with associated high repair costs and dealer warranty disputes.

Best version to buy

Insufficient owner data available to declare a consensus "best version." Discussion indicates the current generation (2022+) is preferred for its redesigned interior and updated features over older models. There is no specific trim level repeatedly endorsed; focus remains almost entirely on powertrain generation.

Known issues

  • CVT Transmission Failure (Pre-2022 Generations): Complete transmission failure, whining noises, judder, and high replacement costs. Cited as a widespread, well-known industry issue. Frequency: very frequent.
  • CVT Transmission Reliability Concerns (All Generations): Persistent anxiety about long-term durability, even for newer models. Requires strict, frequent fluid service intervals. Frequency: very frequent.
  • 1.5L Turbo Engine Reliability Apprehension (2022+ Generations): Concerns about the long-term viability of the complex, turbocharged three-cylinder engine with variable compression. Fear of costly engine replacement. Frequency: recurrent.

The verdict

The Hyundai Tucson is the better choice for most buyers.

It has better fuel economy on its best-equipped version than the Nissan Rogue, based on the data above. If power matters more to you than running costs, the Nissan Rogue is worth a closer look instead.

Not sure which one fits you?

Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.

Take the quiz

Frequently asked questions

Which is more reliable, the Hyundai Tucson or the Nissan Rogue?

Owner reports show similar reliability sentiment for the Hyundai Tucson and the Nissan Rogue. Check the known issues listed above for specific differences between the two.

Which is better for families, the Hyundai Tucson or the Nissan Rogue?

The Nissan Rogue seats more passengers than the Hyundai Tucson on its catalogued best-equipped version. Body type also differs: the Hyundai Tucson is classed as a SUV, the Nissan Rogue as a SUV.

Which has better fuel economy, the Hyundai Tucson or the Nissan Rogue?

The Hyundai Tucson is more fuel-efficient on paper: 3.2 L/100km combined versus 9 L/100km for the Nissan Rogue, based on the best-equipped catalogued version of each.

Which is cheaper to maintain, the Hyundai Tucson or the Nissan Rogue?

Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but owner reports mention cost-related concerns more often for the Nissan Rogue than the Hyundai Tucson. See the known issues comparison above.