Brands/Mazda/Compare
Mazda CX-30
Mazda

Mazda

CX-30

Owner report
Toyota C-HR
Toyota

Toyota

C-HR

Owner report

Mazda CX-30 vs Toyota C-HR: 2024 Comparison

Updated June 2026

The short answer

The Mazda CX-30 offers power, while the Toyota C-HR excels at fuel economy instead. Choose the Mazda CX-30 if you prioritize power in daily driving, or the Toyota C-HR if fuel economy matters more for your needs. Both are covered by real owner reports on CarWizz.

Specs side by side

Specification
CX-30
C-HR
Typical price (used, US)
$22,184–$29,287
$16,799–$34,492
Power
250 Hp
223 Hp
Torque
434 Nm
208 Nm
Acceleration
N/A
7.3s
Top speed
203 km/h
180 km/h
Fuel consumption
9.4 L/100km
0.8-0.9 L/100km
Drive
All wheel drive
Front wheel drive
Transmission
6 gears, automatic
automatic transmission e-CVT
Engine
2.5 L
2 L
Seats
5
5
Body type
SUV
SUV

What owners say

CX-30

Overall

Overwhelmingly positive sentiment among owners, characterized by high satisfaction with driving dynamics, interior quality, and overall reliability. The vehicle is consistently praised for its responsive and fun-to-drive nature, with both naturally aspirated and turbocharged engines receiving commendation for good acceleration and power. The interior is frequently described as feeling premium and luxurious for its price point, with high-quality materials and a functional, button-centric layout.

Best version to buy

Insufficient owner data available to declare a single consensus "best" trim. Feedback indicates high satisfaction across trims, from base models to top-tier Turbo versions.

Known issues

  • Limited rear passenger and cargo space: very frequent mention of cramped rear seats, especially with child car seats, and limited trunk space.

C-HR

Overall

Sentiment is mixed and varies significantly by powertrain and generation. For the first-generation gasoline models (approximately 2018-2022), feedback is predominantly negative, centering on widespread and severe concerns about the reliability of the conventional CVT transmission, with reports of premature failure and expensive replacements. These models are also frequently criticized for being underpowered, offering poor rear visibility, and having limited rear-seat and cargo space.

Best version to buy

The hybrid (HEV) version is strongly favored over the gasoline model for its superior fuel economy and, critically, its different and more reliable e-CVT transmission which is not subject to the widespread failures reported in the conventional CVT. For the upcoming electric generation, no specific trim is recommended, but the dual-motor AWD configuration is the only one mentioned.

Known issues

  • Conventional CVT Transmission Failures: Reports of premature failure, strange noises, and complete breakdowns, with replacement costs cited around $10,000. Described as a widespread, known issue for 2017-2022 gasoline models.
  • Poor Rear Visibility: Thick C-pillars and a small rear window create significant blind spots. Frequency: very frequent.
  • Limited Rear Seat and Cargo Space: Cramped rear passenger area and trunk space noted as smaller than segment averages. Frequency: frequent.

The verdict

The Mazda CX-30 is the better choice for most buyers.

It has stronger reliability sentiment in owner reports than the Toyota C-HR, based on the data above. If the specific known issues on the Mazda CX-30 are a dealbreaker, the Toyota C-HR is worth a closer look instead.

Not sure which one fits you?

Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.

Take the quiz

Frequently asked questions

Which is more reliable, the Mazda CX-30 or the Toyota C-HR?

Owner reports lean more positive on reliability for the Mazda CX-30 than the Toyota C-HR. See the known issues comparison above for the specific concerns owners report on each.

Which is better for families, the Mazda CX-30 or the Toyota C-HR?

Data on family-specific factors like cargo space is limited for one or both models, but based on available reports, both are positioned as practical daily drivers. Check the specs table above for seating and body type.

Which has better fuel economy, the Mazda CX-30 or the Toyota C-HR?

The Toyota C-HR is more fuel-efficient on paper: 0.8-0.9 L/100km combined versus 9.4 L/100km for the Mazda CX-30, based on the best-equipped catalogued version of each.

Which is cheaper to maintain, the Mazda CX-30 or the Toyota C-HR?

Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but owner reports mention cost-related concerns more often for the Toyota C-HR than the Mazda CX-30. See the known issues comparison above.