Mazda
CX-50
Nissan
Rogue
Mazda CX-50 vs Nissan Rogue: 2025 Comparison
The short answer
Based on available data, the Nissan Rogue comes out ahead of the Mazda CX-50 on fuel economy and power. Check the specs table and owner sentiment below for the full comparison before deciding between the two. Both are covered by real owner reports on CarWizz.
Specs side by side
What owners say
CX-50
Overall
Mixed sentiment with a clear distinction between powertrain choices. The CX-50 Hybrid is widely praised for its excellent fuel economy (38 MPG combined), strong acceleration (0-60 mph in 7.6 seconds / 0-97 km/h), and the proven reliability of its Toyota-sourced hybrid drivetrain, which is considered "bulletproof." The gas-only models, particularly the Turbo variant, are acknowledged for being quick and fun to drive but are criticized for poor fuel economy and a harsh, uncomfortable ride. Significant and recurrent criticism is directed at the vehicle's build quality, fit-and-finish issues, and general reliability stemming from its Alabama, USA manufacturing plant, with multiple reports of various glitches, faults, and premature wear.
Best version to buy
CX-50 Hybrid (Premium or Premium Plus trims). The hybrid powertrain is overwhelmingly recommended for its combination of fuel efficiency, adequate power, and the exceptional reliability of the Toyota hybrid system.
Known issues
- ⚠Build quality and reliability concerns (Alabama plant): various glitches, fuel door failures, poor stitching on seats, fit-and-finish issues, general drop in quality compared to Japanese-built Mazdas. Frequency: very frequent.
- ⚠Uncomfortable, firm ride quality: described as harsh, bumpy, and jarring over imperfections, especially in Turbo models and/or those with larger wheels. Frequency: very frequent.
- ⚠Firm/uncomfortable seats: side bolsters described as very firm, potentially uncomfortable for wider occupants. Frequency: recurrent.
Rogue
Overall
Sentiment is sharply divided by generation and powertrain. For models from approximately 2011-2020 equipped with the 2.5L four-cylinder and traditional CVT, sentiment is overwhelmingly negative, dominated by widespread and severe concerns over CVT transmission reliability, which is described as a notorious, well-known failure point. Long-term owners of these generations report transmissions failing between 67,000 and 130,000 miles, with associated high repair costs and dealer warranty disputes.
Best version to buy
Insufficient owner data available to declare a consensus "best version." Discussion indicates the current generation (2022+) is preferred for its redesigned interior and updated features over older models. There is no specific trim level repeatedly endorsed; focus remains almost entirely on powertrain generation.
Known issues
- ⚠CVT Transmission Failure (Pre-2022 Generations): Complete transmission failure, whining noises, judder, and high replacement costs. Cited as a widespread, well-known industry issue. Frequency: very frequent.
- ⚠CVT Transmission Reliability Concerns (All Generations): Persistent anxiety about long-term durability, even for newer models. Requires strict, frequent fluid service intervals. Frequency: very frequent.
- ⚠1.5L Turbo Engine Reliability Apprehension (2022+ Generations): Concerns about the long-term viability of the complex, turbocharged three-cylinder engine with variable compression. Fear of costly engine replacement. Frequency: recurrent.
The verdict
The Nissan Rogue is the better choice for most buyers.
It has better fuel economy on its best-equipped version than the Mazda CX-50, based on the data above. If power matters more to you than running costs, the Mazda CX-50 is worth a closer look instead.
Explore further
Not sure which one fits you?
Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more reliable, the Mazda CX-50 or the Nissan Rogue?
Owner reports show similar reliability sentiment for the Mazda CX-50 and the Nissan Rogue. Check the known issues listed above for specific differences between the two.
Which is better for families, the Mazda CX-50 or the Nissan Rogue?
The Nissan Rogue seats more passengers than the Mazda CX-50 on its catalogued best-equipped version. Body type also differs: the Mazda CX-50 is classed as a SUV, the Nissan Rogue as a SUV.
Which has better fuel economy, the Mazda CX-50 or the Nissan Rogue?
The Nissan Rogue is more fuel-efficient on paper: 9 L/100km combined versus 9.4 L/100km for the Mazda CX-50, based on the best-equipped catalogued version of each.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Mazda CX-50 or the Nissan Rogue?
Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but owner reports mention cost-related concerns more often for the Nissan Rogue than the Mazda CX-50. See the known issues comparison above.