Ford
Explorer
Owner report available
Subaru
Ascent
Owner report available
Ford Explorer vs Subaru Ascent
The short answer
Based on available data, the Ford Explorer comes out ahead of the Subaru Ascent on power. Check the specs table and owner sentiment below for the full comparison before deciding between the two. Both are covered by real owner reports on CarWizz.
Specs side by side
What owners say
Explorer
Overall
Mixed sentiment with a clear generational divide. The current-generation Explorer (2020+) is frequently praised for its spacious interior, particularly the generous cargo and third-row space, comfortable ride, and strong performance in ST and Platinum trims. The 3.0L EcoBoost V6 in performance models is highlighted as a standout feature, providing a fun and powerful driving experience.
Best version to buy
Explorer ST (2020+): The ST trim is specifically recommended by owners for its engaging 400-horsepower 3.0L EcoBoost V6 engine, which transforms the driving experience and is described as "a blast to drive." It is noted for retaining practicality while offering performance that makes it enjoyable for the driver. The Platinum trim is also mentioned as a top choice for maximizing luxury features.
Known issues
- Transmission reliability problems: Includes rough shifting, laggy response, complete failure, and concerns about longevity. Noted as a weak point across the model line, with failures occurring at both low and high mileage.
- Engine and cooling system problems: Reports of engines overheating, internal flooding, and repeated catalytic converter failures requiring multiple replacements. Frequency: recurrent.
- General reliability concerns: Broad statements about Ford reliability being "average to below average," with specific mentions of expensive repairs and the need for significant maintenance budgets. Frequency: recurrent.
Ascent
Overall
Mixed sentiment with a clear generational divide. The vehicle is widely praised for its safety, all-weather capability with standard symmetrical all-wheel drive, spacious and usable third row, strong towing capacity for the class, and car-like handling. The turbocharged 2.4L FA24 engine is frequently noted for being robust and providing good power.
Best version to buy
Model year 2021 or newer. Specific feedback on trims is limited, but the Limited trim is mentioned positively for its feature set.
Known issues
- CVT transmission reliability: failures, recalls, whining noise, inability to handle heavy load or towing, concerns about long-term durability. Primarily affects 2019-2020 models. Frequency: very frequent.
- Disappointing fuel economy: real-world combined mileage reported around 22 MPG, which is considered poor for the class. Frequency: very frequent.
- Interior build quality and materials: interior rattles, use of hard plastics, compromises to meet price point. Frequency: recurrent.
The verdict
The Ford Explorer is the better choice for most buyers.
It has more power on its best-equipped version than the Subaru Ascent, based on the data above. If efficiency matters more to you than outright power, the Subaru Ascent is worth a closer look instead.
Explore further
Common problems by model year
Not sure which one fits you?
Answer a few questions and get a personalized recommendation.
Frequently asked questions
Which is more reliable, the Ford Explorer or the Subaru Ascent?
Owner reports show similar reliability sentiment for the Ford Explorer and the Subaru Ascent. Check the known issues listed above for specific differences between the two.
Which is better for families, the Ford Explorer or the Subaru Ascent?
The Subaru Ascent seats more passengers than the Ford Explorer on its catalogued best-equipped version. Body type also differs: the Ford Explorer is classed as a SUV, the Subaru Ascent as a SUV.
Which has better fuel economy, the Ford Explorer or the Subaru Ascent?
The EPA rates the 2027 Ford Explorer at 19–23 mpg combined and the 2027 Subaru Ascent at 21–22 mpg, depending on the version.
Which is cheaper to maintain, the Ford Explorer or the Subaru Ascent?
Exact maintenance costs aren't in our data, but reliability signals above are the closest proxy: fewer reported issues generally means lower repair costs over time.